Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

my next bolt action: 30-06?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by jason41987, Apr 14, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jason41987

    jason41987 member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,293
    well, ive been wanting to get a new bolt action for a while now, been focusing on other types of firearms, and really only have a mosin nagant at this point, but i want a good bolt action, i mean, one capable of long range target practice.. as most mosins were made cheap and for a war effort, their accuracy isnt all that great, limited options for .311 bullets, etc

    so i think i decided i want a .30-06, ive considered .308, 6.5 creedmor, .300 winchester magnum, and a couple other 30 caliber magnums.. decided to skip the magnums because of ammo and reloading component availability, the cost is just too high for regular practice and target shooting

    ive come to really like the 208 grain hornady a-max bullet in .308... i could be wrong, but this should work well in a 30-06, i dont think theyd work well in a .308, and the -06 has a bit more powder to push it along, and the .30-06 is common enough to find less expensive ammo and an abundance of reloading supplies

    so does any of this logic seem flawed? would you recommend something besides the .30-06 for a roughly 1000 yard rifle (target shooting, not hunting of course) and which rifles would you recommend? ive been looking at ruger M77s which seem very mauser-like, as well as the savage rifles, but i hear sako and tika are pretty nice too

    i was going to use the money i had save on a new semi automatic.. something more modern, but decided id rather take this money to improve my AK-74, get a new long range bolt action, and then focus my efforts on collecting old military rifles
     
  2. firesky101

    firesky101 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,433
    Location:
    California
    I know you are concerned about component availability, but once you have the brass any of the .30 cals are in the same boat (seeing as you are not concerned about '06). The .300wsm will push that 208gr along much better than the '06. Sure the ol' springfield can do it, but 200gr really starts to stretch the limits of what that cartridge can effectively put downrange w/velocity (much like 180's in a .308).
     
  3. Art Eatman

    Art Eatman Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    43,479
    Location:
    Terlingua, TX; Thomasville,GA
    There was a thread here a few years back with some posts by a couple of guys who were using '06s with 30" barrels and Berger VLD bullets (230-grain, IIRC) and getting MOA or better at 1,200 to 1,300 yards.

    I've never shot beyond 500 yards, but my Weatherby Mark V in '06 with a 26" barrel easily shot into one MOA or a tad better. I used Sierra bullets of 150, 165 and 180 grain weight.
     
  4. chaser_2332

    chaser_2332 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2009
    Messages:
    516
    imho the 06' doesnt offer enough advantage over a 308 for targets at 1000yds to justify a long action and more powder vs the short you would run on a 308. A 308 shooting 175's has no problems at 1000yds
     
  5. j2crows

    j2crows Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    177
    Location:
    New Mexico
    I always wanted a 30.06...Until I got one! Sorry , I found no mystic in the '06.
     
  6. jason41987

    jason41987 member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,293
    another reason for me to go .30-06 is that i do intend on getting a garand, maybe even before this, and at some point a 1903 springfield, and i just cant imagine collecting either of these in any other caliber... but firesky is right, you can make a huge number of other cartridges based on 30-06 brass
     
  7. adelbridge

    adelbridge Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,107
    Location:
    Texas
    If you are reloading looking at .260 Remington
     
  8. Inebriated

    Inebriated Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,683
    Location:
    NC
    I'm biased towards .30-06, so naturally I'll say do it.

    But also, if you're not taking game, don't overlook .243, .260, 6.5, etc. The 6mm-6.5mm cartridges give you high BC bullet options, less recoil, flatter trajectory than the .30-06, and if you're reloading, they're not much to reload. Especially .243. For rifles, Savage and Remington dominate the aftermarket, so if you're going to be building a target rifle, you'll probably have the greatest ease with either of them. Savages tend to be sub-MOA out-of-box, and are generally going to cost less to get to the same level as accuracy in a Remington. Also, be ready to spend quite a bit on a scope. 1000 yards is going to be awfully frustrating looking through a lower-end scope at 50x.
     
  9. jason41987

    jason41987 member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,293
    what attracts me to the .30-06 though is the availability, if there was a magnum cartridge just as available, i may go for it, but .30-06 is everywhere, i can still be convinced otherwise if anyone knows of any widely available magnum cartridges? 300 winchester magnum is all i can think of being relatively common

    if i was convinced to go with a cartridge that was less available, and stock ammo on it, then id be wanting something incredibly long-range, like a 338 lapua.. but inedbriated is right.. i still need a good scope
     
  10. Kachok

    Kachok Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    4,429
    Location:
    Palestine TX
    Since you want to shoot considerable range I would opt for the 6.5 Creedmore, it is the only one on your list designed specifically for that task. Ammo is less expensive then I would have though by a considerable margin, and you can shoot it quite a bit if you want, the mid ranged 6.5mms have next to nothing recoil.
    308 lacks the case volume for my heavier bullets it would not make my A-list for long range shooting, 30-06 has that little extra case volume allowing me to use 200+gr bullets, but load data is slim for match bullets, Hornady does not even publish 06 data for their 208gr A-Max, I wrote them a nasty letter over that. While I love my 06 it will do nothing to paper at long range that my 6.5mm does not do better and with less recoil.
     
  11. mtrmn

    mtrmn Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2011
    Messages:
    877
    Location:
    Louisiana
    Townsend Whelen: "The 30-06 is never a mistake."
     
  12. Haxby

    Haxby Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2011
    Messages:
    994
    Nothing wrong with the '06. For the 208 gr amax, you might want to pick one with a 1/10 twist.
    If you want a factory 30-06 with a long, heavy barrel, for shooting targets at long range, I don't know if there is one.
     
  13. jason41987

    jason41987 member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,293
    well, i have been getting into my own gunsmithing, currently building my second AK for example, have done some work on some of the other bolt actions i had.. maybe buying an action and customizing the rifle myself would suit me best for those longer bullets?

    should i go this route, could anyone suggest an action i should consider building upon?... i can get a 1903 springfield barreled action for about $200 i could rebarrel and rebuild, maybe hand-carve a new military style stock for it so itll look WWII.. i used to build guitars, so carving stocks requires the tools and skills i already have.. old mauser actions dont cost much either

    any new actions i should look at? if i went with a new action id be interested in one of the solid-top actions with a rail for scope rings
     
  14. chaser_2332

    chaser_2332 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2009
    Messages:
    516
    defiance
     
  15. Gtscotty

    Gtscotty Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,292
    Location:
    Wyoming
    Well if you went with a savage action, you could easily pick up an '06 barrel built to pretty much any spec you want and thread it on yourself. You would also have many different stock options. Have you looked at 30-06AI? I think a normal '06 will probably do what you want, but Nosler's reloading guide sure does show some impressive loads for the AI. If push came to shove you could still fire normal 30-06 from the AI.

    I'd also second Kachok on the 6.5 Creedmoor as an excellent option for you, very precise factory loads are available if you don't reload.
     
  16. jason41987

    jason41987 member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,293
    ive never heard of .30-06AI, ill have to look that up
     
  17. mnhntr

    mnhntr Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,135
    Location:
    MN
    This is my response also
     
  18. publiuss

    publiuss Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Messages:
    361
    You can NEVER go wrong with an '06.
     
  19. jason41987

    jason41987 member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2012
    Messages:
    1,293
    is a 1903 springfield action strong enough for full powered modern loads or does it have to be down-loaded?.. i think building one on a 1903 action, and replicating a military stock for it could be kinda cool, but if the action cant handle it then ill probably go for a savage, or a ruger M77
     
  20. Art Eatman

    Art Eatman Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    43,479
    Location:
    Terlingua, TX; Thomasville,GA
    The 03 action is the "weakest" among most modern bolt action designs. It's not "bad weak", of course, but I wouldn't load to the max pressures of most other actions.

    My limited understanding is that the firing pin is the weak link. Rare, for sure, but they can blow out to the rear.
     
  21. Reloadron
    • Contributing Member

    Reloadron Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2012
    Messages:
    6,949
    Location:
    Cleveland, Ohio USA
    The 30-06 AI (Ackley Improved) is one of these.

    Read a little about P.O. Ackley here.

    I also agree with Art in that the 03 Springfield, while a good rifle would not be a very good candidate. There are a large number of Mauser type actions that were sporterized and converted to 30-06 which may be a better choice if you take that route.

    Ron
     
  22. dirtykid

    dirtykid Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2010
    Messages:
    538
    Location:
    Minne-soda
    Like Jason, I think along the same lines, Although I lack the gunsmithing ability to build my own tricked out 06' , so I ordered one built like this one shown on this sites page,

    http://www.redhawkrifles.com/

    Its just like their "Alaskan fluted" , only with same stock, 1:9 twist 26" barrel with a BDL-style mag (I hate carrying clips) with a Nightforce 5.5x20-56 , 20MOA base

    I figure I should be hitting 1000-yds easy
     
  23. PedalBiker

    PedalBiker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    Messages:
    536
    Location:
    Colorado
    I have a Ruger in 30-06. It's not what I'd get for long range target shooting. It's an awesome hunting rifle, it's very rugged, but it's not my most accurate rifle.

    I have a Savage that's a long action 110, but milled out for short action and chambered 243. It's super accurate and fun to shoot because it's pretty heavy. I even bought a 260 barrel for it and cut it down to 19" for deer hunting. The aftermarket 260barrel was a cheap one, so it's not a tack driver. But it's fine for deer.

    If I was getting a rifle for long range targets I'd get one in 260 Rem or Creedmore, otherwise look at a fast twist 243 Win. If you shoot 105g A max 6mm bullets you're good for at least 1000 yards.
     
  24. Welding Rod

    Welding Rod Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    1,774
    Location:
    PacNW
    You may want to look at a new Model 70.

    I have one in 30-06, a Sporter, and shot it in a hi-power type match today for bolt guns. It did real well. The trigger break is totally crisp and clean even though it takes a fair pull force.

    The barrel is perfectly floated and the POI didn't change during rapid fire strings. The action is quite smooth, and The magazine is easy to load quickly during rapid fire.

    I was just shooting my standard Garand loads in it (Hornady 150 FMJ & H4895, canelured & crimped), and the gun would easily hold the 10 ring, and I am almost sure it will hold the X ring - I have not bagged the gun so I can't say for sure.

    To top it off, it is in a beautiful piece of walnut.
     
  25. Jcinnb

    Jcinnb Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2013
    Messages:
    296
    Location:
    New Bern, NC
    Curious why no one mentioned 25-06. Too much range for it to handle?

    I just got one, but not for 1,000 yds. Just curious.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page