Your state likely has its own constitutional protections that are far more specific in their intent. I live in NV.
The NV constitution says this:
Sec. 11. Right to keep and bear arms; civil power supreme.
1. Every citizen has the right to keep and bear arms for security and defense, for lawful hunting and recreational use and for other lawful purposes.
2. The military shall be subordinate to the civil power; No standing army shall be maintained by this State in time of peace, and in time of War, no appropriation for a standing army shall be for a longer time than two years.
I would argue this is a considerably more specific and modern protection for the RKBA. Also, there is a totally separate section regarding the state militia and the governor's power to call out said militia. There is zero confusion about who the militia is and what their function is and how it ties into gun ownership and carry. The legislature wisely kept the two separate.
When one considers the original intent of the 2nd Amendment, I like Nevada's approach far more and the state protections are very clear. The downside to this is that other states will have different ideas on this topic and you might not be able to conceal your firearm across state lines. But this is also the biggest strength of such a system; while your rights might not be as clearly protected in a neighboring state, that state does not force its laws upon you. And its far easier to rewrite bad legislation at the state level, than at the federal level. If I could impress upon the gun rights folks anything, it would be to stop challenging laws on the basis of the 2A. Challenge them at the state level.