beerslurpy
member
Keep the pressure on. Call, write, email. We need to make sure this comes for a vote. There is an election coming up and they need to remember that we are watching them and we will rememeber when voting time comes around.
Again state's rights lose over the federal Govt.
jobu07 said:I'm glad my Congressman is on the list, NY-29. We've had pretty strong and un-obstructed ccw in NY for many many years now. The only catch is that NY won't let anyone outside of her carry a handgun period. This law should change that
California needs it. The state still hasn't come to grips with accommodating H.R. 218.If this passes, California is going to panic. Just a hop skip and a jump to NV to get a CCW permit. CA would have to honor it. HE HE HE!!!!!!
That would be the best part, jamming in down the anti's throat in NY and CA.Pilgrim said:California needs it. The state still hasn't come to grips with accommodating H.R. 218.
Pilgrim
Sheldon J said:That would be the best part, jamming in down the anti's throat in NY and CA.
TwoGun said:If I understand the bill correctly, it doesn't give the federal goverment power over CCW but simply forces states to recognize other states license. Just like they do marriage license and death certificates. There is no power for the feds here.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Ah, I remember when I was young and naive and still thought we had a chance here in the PRK. I would think Taco would know by now we are a liberal hell hole. Sadly the only chance we have to turn this state around is a green glow and mushroom cloud coming up over the Grapevine. I don't think any of us would consider that worth it.It's not just CA and NY. CA will probably get shall-issue CCW sooner or later. It may take a while but I think it will happen. CA is a lot more conservative than it might seem.
UGH! No no no no no!
I do NOT want the BATFE presiding over CCW permits!
This bill must get shot down, and quickly.
That would be the best part, jamming in down the anti's throat in NY and CA.
may carry in any State a concealed firearm in accordance with the terms of the license or with the laws of the State of the person's residence, subject to the laws of the State in which the firearm is carried concerning specific types of locations in which firearms may not be carried
That's how I read it. All this bill does is take your existing CCW and requires all states to recognize it.TwoGun said:If I understand the bill correctly, it doesn't give the federal goverment power over CCW but simply forces states to recognize other states license. Just like they do marriage license and death certificates. There is no power for the feds here.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
When States violate the Constitution.Sistema1927 said:Why do we think that the Federal Government forcing the states to do ANYTHING is a good idea?
Sistema1927 said:According to the US Constitution, the powers not specifically granted to the Federal Government are reserved to the states.
States rights, folks, states rights.
Not even that far, Classes are given in-state for out-of state permits.MrTuffPaws said:If this passes, California is going to panic. Just a hop skip and a jump to NV to get a CCW permit. CA would have to honor it. HE HE HE!!!!!!
Not even that far, Classes are given in-state for out-of state permits.MrTuffPaws said:If this passes, California is going to panic. Just a hop skip and a jump to NV to get a CCW permit. CA would have to honor it. HE HE HE!!!!!!
Moparmike said:I may have missed a few posts, so forgive me...
How does this apply to full-cap mags in CA and MA? If I conceal a pistol without the proper gizmos or registraton (CA, MA, NY), whats next?
OH. You mean full reciprocity under the law? Just like provided for in the constitution? What a novel thought
As I recall, the AWB renewal bill had well over 300 co-sponsors.Nationwide Concealed Carry Bill has 72 Consponsors