nemesis
Member
A fella I know is a ROTC instructor, CHL instructor and a purveyor of holsters and such in his spare time. He was at the Austin show last weekend and reports the following.
A coupla guys spent some time at his tables looking at holsters and then moved on. Shortly after, he heard one round fired about two rows over.
Apparently, this one guy tried on a shoulder holster; reached suddenly into his fanny pack and pulled a gun. The Springfield XD was concealed, loaded and untied. As he inserted the pistol into the holster, muzzle to the rear, he had his finger on the trigger of his XD-40 and it fired rearward.
A man behind him was struck in the leg but the bullet exited and came to rest against a table or some other object.
It may not have happened should the pistol have had an actual selectable manual safety and it definitely wouldn't happen if that scarecrow had a brain.
Shouldn't the Second Amendment be changed to read "The right of the people with brains to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"?
A coupla guys spent some time at his tables looking at holsters and then moved on. Shortly after, he heard one round fired about two rows over.
Apparently, this one guy tried on a shoulder holster; reached suddenly into his fanny pack and pulled a gun. The Springfield XD was concealed, loaded and untied. As he inserted the pistol into the holster, muzzle to the rear, he had his finger on the trigger of his XD-40 and it fired rearward.
A man behind him was struck in the leg but the bullet exited and came to rest against a table or some other object.
It may not have happened should the pistol have had an actual selectable manual safety and it definitely wouldn't happen if that scarecrow had a brain.
Shouldn't the Second Amendment be changed to read "The right of the people with brains to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"?