*NEW* RMR 158gr RNFP match bullets

Status
Not open for further replies.

sellersm

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
618
Location
CO Rockies
I recently ordered some of the RMR 158gr RNFP plated bullets. These are their own plated bullets, similar to their Match bullets in .45acp and 9mm.

At first I thought I got the wrong ones, as they didn't have a cannelure as the previous ones I had ordered did.

These new bullets are slightly longer (by about .013") than the previous ones that did have a cannelure.

RMR suggested that I give these a try, as they are their brand new 'match' 38/357 bullets, so I gave them a test...

These bullets are very accurate!

Attached is a pic from yesterday's testing. The total overall grouping is under 1.5"... (I know, I didn't put a scale in the pic but I did measure)

I had the target at 10 yards, firing through my S&W 686+ 4" barrel, using approx. 6.7gr W231 powder in new Starline brass (don't recall the primer).

I'll be keeping these bullets, and probably get some more soon!!

eBai3en.png
 
:cool:
Nice to know that they work well for you
I really like the 124gr 9mm FN hard core, and have had excellent results with the 230 .45 RN so it makes sense that the .357 are excellent bullets as well.

Next time I need .357 bullets I will have to give those a try.
RMR is great to do business with.


PS:
3 touching and 3 touching nice shooting.
 
I know what a round nose bullet is. And I thought I knew what a flat point bullet is. But what is a round nose flat point bullet? Is that different from just a flat point?? I'm confused.
 
EGD, I am Ryan from Rocky Mountain Reloading. One of my responsibilities is to list bullets on our web site. We see many bullet profiles, many of which have a flat point (FP) or a flat nose (FN). For our simplicifation of nomenclature, I try to stick with flat point.

38Super.net has some great images showing these prfiles, but they are copyrighted. I will put a link at the end of this post so you can visit them. Here are the profiles they list and their descriptions:

Nose Shape

The principal distinction in bullet geometry is the shape of their nose. Pistol bullet nose shapes fall into two categories, round nose and flat nose. Round nose bullets are distinguished by the shape of the ogive (the rounded curvature of the nose). They vary from being somewhat pointy to downright blunt. Flat nose bullets for semi-automatic pistols can be broken down into shape subcategories. The common shapes are shown in Figure 4A. The shape of the shoulder and sides of the nose vary in design. (The terms flat nose and flat point are used interchangeably.)

Round Nose (RN) bullets have a slight change of angle at the shoulder and curved sides of the nose leading to a round point. This is a common design for semi-automatic pistol bullets, with the exception being .40/10mm caliber bullets that are designed principally with a flat nose.

Round Nose Flat Point (RNFP) designs have a gradual change of angle at the shoulder and curved nose sides leading to a flat point. Many hollow point bullets follow this design.

Truncated Cone (TC) bullets have an abrupt change of angle that forms the shoulder and straight, tapered sides leading to a flat point. This design is common for .40/10mm caliber bullets.

Semi-Wadcutter (SWC) bullets are easily identified because they have a sharp, often 90 degree, abrupt edge at the shoulder and (usually) straight, tapered sides leading to a flat point. Round nose versions can also be found. SWC bullets have a wide shoulder “ledge” that makes a clean, caliber-wide hole in paper targets.

Rebated (or Recessed) Nose (ReN) bullets have a short, abrupt shoulder, similar to the semi-wadcutter design, but not nearly as wide. The nose side is sometimes parallel with the driving band for some distance. The nose point can be round or flat. This design usually does not produce a clean, caliber wide hole in paper targets like semi-wadcutter bullets.

Here's the promised link: http://38super.net/Pages/Bullet%20Design%20and%20Feeding%20Reliability.html
 
They weren't on the website until now. The ones that sellersm got were a mistake. Our packagers had prepackaged a bunch of them and forgot to differentiate them from the others that we have. The ones Sellersm is talking about are the hardcore match. Here is the link to them. http://shop.rmrbullets.com/357-38-1...3F25F5F5C9E8D510C60EEA64984930.m1plqscsfapp06
And what a mistake it was!!! I was a bit hesitant at first, especially with no cannelure and slightly longer length, but the results speak for themselves...

Consider me a still-happy customer of RMR Bullets.

ETA: I did not chrony them, pretty sure I'm not driving them too fast as that wasn't my goal. I was looking for accuracy and easy-to-shoot. From all my test loads, this was the most accurate. Lighter weight charges were terrible groups, a bit heavier loads added nothing to accuracy.
 
Thanks Jake and Ryan, I know I look at the web site this morning when I read Sellersm's post and it wasn't there.

When the 9mm and 45acp match bullets came out I ask why no .357mags. I am really glad to see them and will be ordering very soon.

Thanks guys.
 
Thanks Jake and Ryan, I know I look at the web site this morning when I read Sellersm's post and it wasn't there.

When the 9mm and 45acp match bullets came out I ask why no .357mags. I am really glad to see them and will be ordering very soon.

Thanks guys.
I'm looking forward to your comments after you try them!
 
I ordered them yesterday morning, now I need to find some time to get them loaded and test them.

I'm looking forward to trying these, with a speed limit of 1400fps they fit right into my style of shooting. I feel some AA9 loads coming up.
 
1400 fps and no crimping cannelure. How are you going to keep them from backing out under recoil? And what makes them "match" bullets?
 
Here is a description of our hardcore line of bullets.

"These bullets are as close to match quality as any plated bullet can get. Though plated bullets are difficult to get a perfect weight every time, we have added several extra features to this bullet to make up for any variances in weight and still provide match accuracy. The first thing to mention is that they are plated very thick compared to other companies. Our plating is measured between .012-.014" thick. This is almost twice as thick as other plated companies. They also have a harder lead core (11-12 BHN) than any plated bullet company that we know of. The hard core and thicker plating resists resizing during the seating process and can actually eliminate bullet setback in many cases. These features alone separate us from all other plated bullets on the market. We also put the bullet through two different types of plating process to get the correct thickness. The first plating process is a liquid electolysis similar to all other plated bullets. The second process is much more involved and results in excess copper on the edges of the base of the bullet which can then be "folded" over onto the base to give it a strong and uniform base. You will notice that the base of the bullet has a ring on it similar to a FMJ bullet. That ring is actually the excess copper after it has been triple sized and folded over. That "ring" helps trap expanding gases and provides a better seal as the bullet obturates. All of these qualities help make our RMR Hardcore bullet the best plated bullet on the market. All that said, it is still a plated bullet so try to keep it within 1500 fps."
 
i recently orfered a batch of 124g RN hardcore match bullets and i can honestly say they are the most consistent bullet (to .001 OAL) i have ever used.
Good stuff!
 
Jake, I read on your website that these bullets were designed to withstand a crimp.
From your link you posted.

Our RMR Hardcore Match bullet lineup has now extended to .357/.38 caliber bullets!

These bullets are designed to withstand a crimp, even though they do not have a cannelure. With our signature Hardcore Match quality, thicker plating, and unmatched plated bullet accuracy, we are sure that you'll quickly fall in love with them!

Is this a roll crimp or taper crimp? Guess I'll find out.


I'll try crimping into these with a roll crimp to see how that goes. I take a pic of the bullet and post it after I knock it back out.
I have the weekend off for a change(I think) so I will also load 6 with 14.9 gr of 2400 with these 158gr bullets to see if the sixth one grows any in length.

I better hold off on the AA9 until I do some testing. I don't know AA9 as well as I know 2400.

I'll mark the shells 1-6 and mic them. I'll... I have a deer to deal with, I'll finish this post later.
 
Feel free to roll crimp it as hard as you want. Granted there is a limit to how far you can crimp it before the casing bulges and won't chamber. Either way, it can handle it.
 
I'll mic #6 after shooting the first 5.

I'll load 6 with and without a crimp to check for slippage.

I don't have a taper crimp in .357 mag so I will be using a roll crimp.

Time to go play.
 
I loaded my .357s with RMR .358gr plated match bullets today. I mic'd several of them and found them to be right on .358" consistently. They were all dead on. As far as outward appearance they look like any other plated bullet.

I'm hand loading on a Rockchucker Supreme single stage press with RCBS carbide dies.

I'm using maximum loads from Lyman's 49th edition.

Brass is my old winchester brass from 20years ago. I decided to use it to simulate standard, normal reloads.

I'm shooting a Ruger GP100 at 7yds. I don't have targets to show because I forgot my smart phone and didn't bring the targets home. You didn't miss anything.

I pressed a bullet in one empty case to set up the crimp as I wanted to see how hard it was to crimp these. Felt pretty normal even though I was crimping into the bullet with no cannular.

attachment.php


attachment.php


Then I knock the bullet back out to see if the plating was cut. It wasn't

It actually looked pretty good. I had visions of smashing the mouth of the from these being to hard. No problem.

attachment.php


Then I started loading them, my first load was 14.9 gr of 2400 seated to 1.608. I loaded 6 and checked them all and they were all within .002" of each other for OAL. The harder core doesn't deform like the softer plated bullets I've used.

#1= 1.609
#2= 1.608
#3= 1.607
#4= 1.607
#5= 1.6075
#6= 1.609 very good!

These had a pretty decent roll crimp.

Biting into the bullet didn't seem to cause any problems with bulging at the case mouth, they all fell in and out of my case gauge. I marked them with a sharpy pen 1-6 c

attachment.php


Then I loaded 6 with 14.9 gr of 2400 with no crimp, just straightened out what little flare there was. I changed the OAL by just raising the entire die up a half a turn or so.

#1= 1.614
#2= 1.614
#3= 1.614
#4= 1.612
#5= 1.6135
#6= 1.612

attachment.php


Then I did the same thing with the max load of Bluedot of 10gr and no crimp.
#1= 1.6125
#2= 1.6125
#3= 1.613
#4= 1.613
#5= 1.614
#6= 1.613

attachment.php


Off to the range.

The first 6 I shot were the crimped rounds of 2400. They shot as normal as my XTP loads shoot as far as recoil, horrendous muzzle flash and so on.
When I got to #6 I pulled it from the cylinder and mic'd it again.

#6= 1.617, after 5 of these it only moved .008". This looks pretty promising, I need to crimp a little harder.

Accuracy was pretty good but I wasn't shooting for accuracy. Around a 2"group at 7yd.

I then shot the uncrimped 2400 loads and the first thing I notice with the first five shots was that my group opened up to about 6" and I had unburnt powder all over the bench. Not enough tension on the bullet without crimping. Around a 6"group at 7yds.

The #6 bullet slipped forward to 1.635" slipping .023" certainly not enough to cause any problems cycling the revolver but it did slip without a crimp. The unburnt powder and 6"group though is a sign of inconsistent pressure with 2400.

Then I shot the maximum Bluedot loads with no crimp and they shot like the crimped 2400 loads, (with less recoil of course) they shot very accurately and my group size was about 2"again.

#6 bullet move out to 1.634 for a set forward of .022".

Even with this very brief amount of testing they definitely need crimped with the slower pressure building powder from what I saw.

#6 2400 14.9gr uncrimped = .023 slip forward
#6 bluedot, 10gr uncrimped = .022 slip forward
#6 2400, 14.9 gr crimped = .008 slip forward

I do like the idea of being able to just crimp into these with 2400 and not having hardly any more set forward than my XTP loads do.


I'll be doing some accuracy testing with these later at 25yds next time around, I want to load more with a little heavier crimp.
 
Last edited:
EGD, I am Ryan from Rocky Mountain Reloading. One of my responsibilities is to list bullets on our web site. We see many bullet profiles, many of which have a flat point (FP) or a flat nose (FN). For our simplicifation of nomenclature, I try to stick with flat point.

38Super.net has some great images showing these prfiles, but they are copyrighted. I will put a link at the end of this post so you can visit them. Here are the profiles they list and their descriptions:

Nose Shape

The principal distinction in bullet geometry is the shape of their nose. Pistol bullet nose shapes fall into two categories, round nose and flat nose. Round nose bullets are distinguished by the shape of the ogive (the rounded curvature of the nose). They vary from being somewhat pointy to downright blunt. Flat nose bullets for semi-automatic pistols can be broken down into shape subcategories. The common shapes are shown in Figure 4A. The shape of the shoulder and sides of the nose vary in design. (The terms flat nose and flat point are used interchangeably.)

Round Nose (RN) bullets have a slight change of angle at the shoulder and curved sides of the nose leading to a round point. This is a common design for semi-automatic pistol bullets, with the exception being .40/10mm caliber bullets that are designed principally with a flat nose.

Round Nose Flat Point (RNFP) designs have a gradual change of angle at the shoulder and curved nose sides leading to a flat point. Many hollow point bullets follow this design.

Truncated Cone (TC) bullets have an abrupt change of angle that forms the shoulder and straight, tapered sides leading to a flat point. This design is common for .40/10mm caliber bullets.

Semi-Wadcutter (SWC) bullets are easily identified because they have a sharp, often 90 degree, abrupt edge at the shoulder and (usually) straight, tapered sides leading to a flat point. Round nose versions can also be found. SWC bullets have a wide shoulder “ledge” that makes a clean, caliber-wide hole in paper targets.

Rebated (or Recessed) Nose (ReN) bullets have a short, abrupt shoulder, similar to the semi-wadcutter design, but not nearly as wide. The nose side is sometimes parallel with the driving band for some distance. The nose point can be round or flat. This design usually does not produce a clean, caliber wide hole in paper targets like semi-wadcutter bullets.

Here's the promised link: http://38super.net/Pages/Bullet%20Design%20and%20Feeding%20Reliability.html

Thanks for the LINK!

A bit off topic but why are most, if not all 40 SW/10MM bullets FN or RNFP?? (not asking about HP bullets??
 
Am I the only one that can't see tightgroup tiger's pictures?

I've been seeing posts where I can't see other posters pictures. I'll put them in as attachments to see if that works.

These are the dummy round setting up my crimp die.
I bullet after I knocked it back out
the first group of six that are numbered.
 

Attachments

  • roll crimp with no cannular.jpg
    roll crimp with no cannular.jpg
    60 KB · Views: 22
  • roll crimp with no cannular2.jpg
    roll crimp with no cannular2.jpg
    144.5 KB · Views: 22
  • RMR Match after roll crimping with no can..jpg
    RMR Match after roll crimping with no can..jpg
    124.5 KB · Views: 23
  • 1010151111.jpg
    1010151111.jpg
    148.1 KB · Views: 24
I don't know if it's the way I put the pictures in or if it's my laptop.
Here are the other two.

I am really looking forward to the next batch of these when i get to try them for accuracy.


Can anyone see them in my post now?

I should have checked in on this sooner but I was smoking a venison backstrap.
 

Attachments

  • 1010151112.jpg
    1010151112.jpg
    140 KB · Views: 23
  • 1010151112a.jpg
    1010151112a.jpg
    139.8 KB · Views: 19
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top