If you can shoot a Glock accurately, then by all means buy one.
My experience was a little different. I've owned 2 Glock 19s, a 27, and a 26. I tried forcing myself to like them because I liked the firepower they pack in such a small/light/durable package. The problem was that I sucked at shooting them! Maybe it was the grip angle, I don't know for sure.
After I bought my first H&K (a USP .40 Compact) I sold all my Glocks immediately. The H&K was so much more accurate in my hands right from the start. I also appreciate the quality of H&Ks. From my experience, they are better built and more reliable than a Glock. However, they also cost $300 more, which to some people is very significant.
The point is, Glock makes a great polymer gun for the money..IF you can shoot them. However, I do believe there are better options.
My experience was a little different. I've owned 2 Glock 19s, a 27, and a 26. I tried forcing myself to like them because I liked the firepower they pack in such a small/light/durable package. The problem was that I sucked at shooting them! Maybe it was the grip angle, I don't know for sure.
After I bought my first H&K (a USP .40 Compact) I sold all my Glocks immediately. The H&K was so much more accurate in my hands right from the start. I also appreciate the quality of H&Ks. From my experience, they are better built and more reliable than a Glock. However, they also cost $300 more, which to some people is very significant.
The point is, Glock makes a great polymer gun for the money..IF you can shoot them. However, I do believe there are better options.