Not-so-big revolvers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Gonna shoot an SP101 this weekend. No doubt the King Cobra will be smoother but it's also almost $200 more expensive. Is it possible to do DIY basic action work on an SP?
I have a 2.25 inch SP101 at 26 ounces and a S&W m60 pro, 3 inch at 22.9 ounces. I generally don't mind some recoil, but the m60 is very uncomfortable with full magnums, while the Ruger isn't too bad. The additional 3.7 ounces of the Ruger makes a bigger difference than I thought it would.
It's pretty easy to improve the SP101 trigger. I installed a 10# main spring, smoothed the strut, and added hammer shims. It has a really smooth and not heavy at all trigger pull. Springs & shims were under $20
 
I have a 2-1/4" SP101 DAO .357 that I replaced the hammer and trigger springs and installed hammer shims and now it has a soft, buttery smooth trigger. The gun field strips quickly and I performed all of the above in about an hour.

I've put several hundred rounds thru it and can easily maintain 3" groups at 15 yards. Even tighter if I really concentrate. I installed a more upright front sight that I can pick up quicker.

I got involved in some competitive shooting so I could work on my reloading speed and shoot at moving targets. I never placed as it was a speed competition and I was up against all semi-autos, but my SP101 held its own and handled the task well.

A Talo Edition 2-1/4" with a fixed Novak rear sight and a dovetailed front sight is now available on Ruger's website.

All in all..my 2-1/4 is a great little shooter.

IMG_20170202_124801797.jpg
 
I have an S&W Model 30 and Model 31, both chambered in 32 S&WL. Both are built on the J-frame platform.

They shoot crazy small groups with fixed sights and 32 wadcutter ammunition.

It is too bad that 32 S&WL is not very popular because they could be the centerfire version of the 22 rimfire ammunition ersions.
 
My bad! That Ruger SP101 Talo Edition has dovetailed sights front and rear...so it can be dialed right in.
 
No need to worry about QC issues on the King Cobra. They were related to the new Python and the issue was that the side plate screws would loosen. No biggie.
 
IMG_20200121_180216607.jpg I'm curious... have you considered the Ruger 3" LCRx357 ? It offers a stainless steel frame, a fantasticly smooth and crisp action, adjustable rear sights, a nice balance and weighs in at 21 ounces. I picked up one and keep it in my EDC rotation with my LCR357. I've put a few hundred rounds thru it and love that I can dial the sights in to accommodate the various weight rounds I experiment with.

Great shooting and great handling little gun.
 
I own several fixed sight guns and as long as I stick to the standard weights they seem to be very close to the intended POI. My S&W model 65 fixed sight 357 is right on target with 158gr bullets. Smith & Wesson seems to have their fixed sight guns very well regulated. Ruger seems to ship fixed sight guns with the front sight a little tall so it can be filed by the owner. But you are correct about adjustable just turning a screw. Thats easy.

I've owned a bunch of single action revolvers, (Ruger, AWA, Pietta, Uberti,) and they ran about 75% on, or as you describe, with a file- to- fit front sight. The rest needed the barrel turned, or the rear sight widened asymmetrically, (or both,) to get on target, except for one .44 Mag stainless Vaquero, which was so far off, I suspect the barrel must have been bent. It hit over a foot left with specials, and closer to 2 feet left and a foot high with magnums.

My double action sample size is much smaller, as I've only owned one fixed sight double action, an old police trade model 10, but it needs some work in that regard. (That's a 100% trouble rate! )

I've had a number of similar issues with autopistols, but it's usually easier to fix, when you can drift or replace a sight.

Like I said, if they hit where they look, a fixed sight gun is as accurate as anything. Getting there just sometimes takes some work.
 
or the rear sight widened asymmetrically,

I have had 3 guns that needed the rear sight widened just a bit on the right side to move the group to the right. One benefit of doing this gave me a little more light on each side of the front sight and worked out to be an improvement. At least for me it did.

The guns were two Taurus model 80 fixed sight 38s and an H&R in 32 mag. But just a few strokes with a file fixed them. Then a little touch up blue.
 
I shoot full house loads in my SP101 and it's no problem to control for even prolonged sessions. I have the Wiley Clapp edition with the driftable front sight and fixed rear sight (Novak). I like it.
 
I have owned two SP101's and both had/have (I still own the 327) horrid triggers.

But my friend has one and the trigger is halfway decent.

I guess they aren't all identical.

I think that the Charter Arms 38's are smaller than a K frame, and all four of my CA revolvers have pretty good triggers.

My 2" K frame 38 special, an old Model 10 from 1961 or so, is not actually that large and has an amazingly good trigger. I would not have believed that a 2" 38 revolver with fixed sights could be that accurate if I didn't own it.
 
I have owned two SP101's and both had/have (I still own the 327) horrid triggers.

This is worth noting on the SP101. I've poured 1,000 rounds through mine and the trigger still stinks. Long and heavy (fine SA though for the range). It's smoothed considerably since I got it but it still stinks.
 
I'm a shooter and not a collector or someone that takes pleasure in the simple ownership of a gun. I've owned over 200 handguns at one time or another and in order for me to keep a handgun, it has to fulfill two requirements. I have to have a need for it and I have to shoot it. If I haven't shot it in 6 months, then I must not need it. Although that may sound foolish to some, it's just the way I am.

I'm owned many revolvers and pistols and I've owned my SP101 longer than any other handgun that I own. When I was looking for a practical sized revolver for me, I ran through all that made sense to me.

The GP100, too big and heavy, but was impressed by how robust it was.
The Security Six, not quite as robust and a bit smaller, but still too big.
Smith 586/686, the L frame was nice. Sweet trigger, but again, too big.
Smith 19/66, the K frame was almost there. Sweet trigger but not robust enough for a steady .357 diet. Just my opinion, not looking for a debate.

The SP101...a sweet spot. It's like a scaled down GP100. Very robust, but you give up one round. Easy to shoot due to size and grip and very concealable, especially with a bobbed hammer. I don't know what the current offerings are, but I think if you look, there's a 3" model around. I can't speak highly enough of this little revolver. If you can live with the weight, this is the way to go. It's no J frame, but it packs a punch and you can actually practice with rounds that pack a punch.

With regard to the posts about the SP101s trigger, they're pretty much accurate, but I wouldn't say it stinks. The trigger just isn't as nice as that of a Smith. Still, it's nothing that keeps me from hitting steel plates at 25 yards.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top