Nu Finish wax tumbling?

Status
Not open for further replies.
mc223
The problem is that you have made several statements of fact, they are not expressions of opinion
Waxes can contaminate powder---extra ingredients of turtle wax could cause a problem---Imperial is loaded with extra super non-powder fouling ingredients
I asked you to substantiate your calims, and you cannot.

Then you say
I may just have Privy info, but now you will never know. Have a good life and make some lemonaid.
This resemmbles a temper tantrum a little boy has. Are you going to hold your breath till you turn blue also?

The facts are that you fill your posts with false infromation and cannot man up to say you are wrong when you are called out.
 
Now boys, let's all step back and take a breath. On the internet, we can't see facial expressions, hear the tone of voice, or tell when someone is joking or having a bad day, so it doesn't pay to get upset with something posted by someone else. Nothing posted here, or any other forum, is gospel, and we all have our opinions, good and bad, true or false, etc. It's up to each individual to decide which advice they choose to follow and which they choose to ignore.

Since you can't shake hands over the internet, please at least agree to not get ugly with your words.

Now I'll turn my collar back around and go back to reloading ammunition.

Fred
 
OK, I can face reality. I was wrong.

I have requested msds from Turtle wax. I will post it here when received.
In the mean time make some lemonade.
 
Last edited:
Shoney said:
If Imperial Sizing Die WAX is preferred to be used, why no Turtle Wax?

Because Turtle wax in with the tumbler media gets inside the case where it can contaminate the powder. The Imperial sizing die wax goes on the outside of the case, before sizing and after the case has been tumbled. It's much less likely to contaminate the powder when it is on the outside of the case.

mc223's cautioned against Turtle Wax in the tumbler, and then recommended Imperial for use on the outside of the case in response to this:
goon said:
I had trouble before with my powder getting contaminated by case lube so I am kind of nervous about this.

I can't speak for mc223 but Imperial wax is not as "runny" as other case lubes, and therefore less likely to get inside Goon's cases during sizing. I think it's a good recommendation.

In short:
Wax inside the case = BAD
Wax outside the case = NOT BAD

Many organic solvents (such as those added to car wax) will act upon the nitrocellulose and nitroglycerin in double base powders. In addition, any alcohol in the wax will enhance the action of these solvents. When mc223 gets the data sheets, I'd be surprised if there wasn't something in the wax that can muck with the powder.
 
Below is a kink to the Msds, it addresses the main ingredients which are petroleum distillates ie. kerosene and Stoddard Solvent. Either of Which could contaminate powder or primers. The waxes are carnuba and polyethelene. There is water and koalin clay. There is no mention of other, very likely emulsifying ingredients.
The real issue here has now become if Turtle wax should be a no-go then NU-Finish is also a no go. Although Nu-Finish does not contain wax. It does contain Stoddard solvent and Solvent 140(could not find a trade name for the solvent 140)

http://www.wd-wpp.com/msds2/00000e3e.pdf

So now its up to you to decide. In my opinion the NU- Finish is the lesser of two evils, and reason enough to reconsider my own use and perhaps just stick with the commercially availabe media refreshers, which may be the same stuff in a different wrapper.
As a thought, perhaps time between cleaning and loading could influence whether there is enough of a given contaminate to degrade a given powder.
Evaporative time would reduce the possibility of a failure. Powder in the case with residual wax and its by products, stored for a longer period of time could lend itself to the effects of contamination as a latent failure. As the petroleum distillates would have time to leach to the powder.
I have never had a fail to fire or other indication of a contamination problem. Perhaps because I tumble my brass as soon as i get home from the range. when it is done it is seperated from the media and stored in open top containers(sometimes for months) on covered, yet open shelves where there would be some circulation, and evaporation of the residual petroleum distillates.
Imperial Sizing die wax is just wax. perhaps it does not contaminate partially because it is applied to the outside of the case but moreover because it does not contain any emulsants or petroleum distillates.

Thanks for your support EddieCoyle
 
mc223...That's how it's done...Facts work everytime. Now the others can make a better choice as to what they are going to do...Me? Untreated media as it comes from my supplier...
 
mc223 thanks for posting Nu finish contains no wax, I've been hesitant to try it as I thought it contained auto wax. I use Lee wax resize lube as it is readily removed from the casing, ever try to remove car wax? My concern here is that nano second between firing and case spring back that the casing needs to grip the chamber.Any thoughts?
 
i have been trying brasso.

For the most part the cases do come out really good. however they all have to be wiped down.

So i got a little curious so i took a bottle brush and went through the insides of some of the cases.

what i did find was residue from the brasso.

So no more brasso. im going back to using mineral spirits. or actually paint thinner is what im going to be using
 
Scrat,

Brasso contains ammonia, and ammonia makes cartridge brass brittle. A number of years ago, a friend brought me some 7mm Remington Magnum cases that had failed on the first reloading, wanting me to help find out why they had failed. The first thing I noticed about them was the color and I asked him what they had been cleaned in. He had gotten the brass from his uncle, who had cleaned them with Brasso.

The cases cracked when crushed with pliers and were extremely brittle. I know some people put Brasso in their tumblers, believing that the small amount used won't contaminate the brass, but considering the pressures inside the cases when fired, my feeling is this is pushing things, when it's not necessary.

The bottom line is, don't use any metal polish that contains ammonia for polishing cartridge brass. The reason it works on brass buckles, etc. is the mass of the metal. A buckle is thick and isn't subject to extreme pressures, whereas cartridge brass is thin and is subjected to extreme pressures.

Hope this helps.

Fred
 
mc223,

As you've been able to get an MSDS for the aforementioned polishes, perhaps you would be willing to go a step further and research the behaviors of the chemicals you mentioned Nu Finish contain.

You say Imperial Sizing die wax contains nothing but wax, but I don't see an MSDS sheet confirming this information.

Before any foolishness starts, let me say I am genuinely interested in your results, as I own and use both products and am in no way interested in yanking any chains here. I simply perceive that you've already been able to locate some MSDS via the internet and are familiar with finding such online.

I suspect, but can't prove, you'll find the solvents in the Nu Finish to have a strong evaporative effect when exposed to open air, thereby extremely minimizing their effect when used as a brass polish and allowing some period of time for the evaporative effect to take hold. I'm basing this theory on the observed behavior of Nu Finish car polish when applied to automobile finishes.

The problem and safety objective would be to determine "how long" it takes for the Nu Finish to have absolutely no effect on reloads and if, in fact, it actually has the potential to do so if the brass is moved from the tumbler to the reloading press immediately.

I also suspect, based on handling, that Imperial Sizing Die Wax also has some sort of solvent in it to cause the wax to soften and become semi-fluidic at a very low temperature (body heat) and allow it to be spread on cases.

I also think, because I use Imperial Sizing Die Wax (and doubt I'm the only one who does so) on case necks in resizing rifle brass, it's a wrong assumption to conclude case lube is only used on the outside of cases when sizing.

I'm interested to hear your further findings and urge you to continue with the research you've started,

Regards,

Dave
 
Some secondary thoughts on the use of waxes on cartridge brass.
I have never had any issues with the phenomenen of case head thrust as relates to the grip of the case to the chamber. Although there has been some specific research on the subject. The findings of that research is posted below in the form of a link to Varmintals website. This deals specifically with case head thrust as it relates to a rifle chamber polished to increasingly finer finish. To cut to the chase, scroll down about halfway on the page to a green chart. Then you must make a decision if waxing the brass might relate to polishing the chamber. My thought is that as rounds are fired, residual wax that is left on the cases is deposited in the chamber. After several firings in a given range session the wax might build up enough to modify the chamber finish to increase case head thrust. I do not know this as fact.

http://www.varmintal.com/a243z.htm

DaveInFloweryBranchGA, Here is the Nu-Finish MSDS

http://www.wd-wpp.com/msds2/000004a1.pdf

Sorry I have not found time to research the Solvent 140. My thoughs are as yours with regard to the evaporative qualities of Nu-Finish, however this quality would be modified in the case as movement of air would be reduced.
Note: MSDS only list ingredients in thier raw form. If a mfg. has a proprietary formulation that may include other ingredients that may be a mutation of the base ingredients through a heating, cooling, dropping or whatever processing, these will not be on an MSDS. I have not researched Imperial as of today.
 
The Rest Of The Story
I am a chemist by training, and when I see questionable information, I call attention to it or ask for the reason to use/not-use a certain product/procedure. One such harmful claim is to use Brasso to clean cartridge brass. The scientific reason WHY NOT TO USE any compounds with ammonia is:

Cartridge brass is 70% copper and 30% zinc. Ammonia leeches the zinc from the brass at a rapid rate, the longer the contact, the more that is leeched. A small reduction in the % zinc will cause the brass to be brittle and can cause catastrophic rupture of the case.---Try this experiment: put a dab of Brasso on a case that is trashed. let it sit for an hour, then remove. You will see the brass is now redish. This is the copper showing on the brass that has lost zinc.

The Bad, The Good, and The Ugly
Yes BAD, the solvents/carriers used in Turtle Wax, NU-Finish, and yes even Hornady One Shot are detrimental to powder and primers.

The GOOD, these solvent/carriers evaporate rapidly, and unless you use a grotesque amount in your tumbling media, they are gone long before powder is introduced into the case. Since One Shot is aerosolized, it is gone almost immediately.

The GOOD, NU-Finish and One Shot are silicone based products, while Turtle Wax contains Carnauba Wax and Polypropylene Wax, and there is absolutely no evidence that Silicone, Carnauba Wax, or Polypropylene Wax are reactive with gunpowder or primers.

The UGLY, pulling information out of some orifice and presenting it as Gospel.
EddieCoyle said ”Because Turtle wax in with the tumbler media gets inside the case where it can contaminate the powder.”
Carnauba Wax, Polypropylene Wax, and Silicone are classified as inert and non-reactive. If the harmful solvent and carriers are gone, show me the evidence that plain Carnauba Wax and Polypropylene Wax are harmful to powder/primer; and conversely that Silicone NU-Finish or one Shot are not.
mc223 said, “Imperial is loaded with extra super non-powder fouling ingredients”
You seem to have ignored the challenge to justify this statement of fact. Please do so.
 
Gentlemen:

I have been monitoring this tread and it has peaked my interest since I have become a believer of Nu Finish and been using it for the past five months with excellent results. I am throughly convince that there is no short term effect of using Nu Finish since I have reloaded and shot over 3,000 casings polished with Nu Finish, some numerous times, without any ill effect. However, if there is an issue it is going to be long term after a round has been reloaded and sit for years. I think it is one of those things that only time will tell. I have come across a few folks that have been using Nu Finish for years without any issues, but I have no idea how fast they turn over their inventory. It would be interesting to hear from some one that has used Nu Finish for years and has inventory that sit in a case tumbled with Nu Finish for years and see if the velocity changed over time. I suspect this will be one of those ongoing debates like polishing loaded ammunition (does the tumbling action breakdown the power). So far I have seen no compelling reason to not use Nu Finish and for that matter none of us know what is the commercial reloading polish; we just all assume is safe and buy it on blind faith.

Keep up the research and I'll keep monitoring this thread.
 
Last edited:
This has been an interesting thread, lots of opinions and feedback. As for my .02 worth I'll toss this in, I have an extensive Haz Mat background to the Level of having been a Haz Mat Tech. Simply put when adding solutions such as Nu Finish or a non ammonia based wax or polishing compound remember, you are diluting it when you pour it into your polishing media, the fluid/liquid portion aerosolizes and dissipates. Whatever is left behind is highly unlikely to be at any level of capable of contaminating your powder. Now insofar as the ammonia from brasso etc, that’s a completely different problem. Ammonia and brass as has already been mentioned is a bad mix. I've used polishing rouge in the past and now use Nu Finish. I am also more than willing to experiment with other types and brands of car wax, depending on their list of contents.

Best

Creekwalker
 
mc223 don't give up, lot of food for thought here.Thanks for the link I bookmarked that one.I had issues with case head thrust in a delayed blowback fluted chamber .308 many years ago.
Long story short RCBS resize goo left on max load cases blew primers completly out, 3 smashed flat between bolt and bolt carrier.HK 91 still functioned.
 
Now that the weekend has finally arrived, and work is not interfering with my personal interests, i'll get back on task. Imperial Sizing Die Wax. More to come. Tally Ho!
 
I had to double check the forum title. Yep. The High Road. That's where I thought I was.

FWIW, I quit using Nu Finish. It did leave a very small amount of greasy residue on the case. Not a big deal but I didn't like getting it on my fingers and in my sizing die. The cases looked nice, though. The bowl of my orange Lyman tumbler got very dirty, black & grimy and was a pain to clean. Now, I just tumble with "Lizard Litter" and it has stayed clean, the bowl is clean and the brass is clean, just not shiney. I do use dryer sheets. And, Nu Finish is great for use on your car.

Cloudpeak
 
Richard Lee tells a story of a shooting friend who had elevated lead levels in his blood. They tested all his reloading equipment and the "hot" spot was the tumbler.

I'm more interested in the lead aspect. I have often wondered about a safe location to use my tumbler. All my reloading is done in the only free space I have, my bedroom. This means that for several hour a week the tumbler is tumbleing away where I spend 7-8 hours every 24. Should this be a concern to me? Should tumbling be done outside? Is this a concern if I only use jacketed bullets, and since the only component in the tubler is the cases how does this become a lead hotspot?:confused:
 
Okay, that's quite enough.

Once again, a topic opened with a good question - - A quest for knowledge. Some good answers and opinions rendered. But then . . . .

How is it that SOME PEOPLE can't simply swap Q&A, or opinions, without being accusatory or argumentative?

So, another decent thread veered wildly, spun out of control, and ran right off the high road. :mad:

CLOSED
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top