henschman
Member
I'm sure she will get a nice lenient plea recommendation from the DA. She will probably wind up with a 1 or 2 year deferred sentence, or something like that.
I'm sure she will get a nice lenient plea recommendation from the DA. She will probably wind up with a 1 or 2 year deferred sentence, or something like that.
I was referring to New York State (NYS), sorry for the confusion.Not really. I believe there are only a few thousand people (out of 12 million people in NYC) who have carry permits that are not current or former law enforcement. Most who do are VIPs. And include several prominent anti-gunners -- it's quite infuriating.
gunowner63, I'm not sure I understand the question, I don't recall saying anything about anti-gunners and CWPs.BikeMutt - IS the list public? I am curious how you know which anti-gunners have CWP's?
NOT trying t ocall you out and check your facts I am just curious to see if its posted somewhere that I can look at.
BikeMutt - IS the list public? I am curious how you know which anti-gunners have CWP's?
NOT trying t ocall you out and check your facts I am just curious to see if its posted somewhere that I can look at.
The real issue is that the NY firearm laws are obviously unconstitutional since they violate the SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED clause of the 2nd Amendment.It's not how she got caught illegally carrying... It's that she was... Illegally carrying.
Still I wish her the best.
So does the prohibition on felons owning guns and 5-year-olds owning handguns. Right? Shall not be infringed.
NYC Has the Sullivan law. even if you have a carry permit from another county in the state you can not carry in NYC.
People need to sue ...
Correct... When the Founding Fathers said "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED", they provided NO EXCEPTIONS... Sometimes you have to stand up for the principle of things... Maybe I would prefer that violent felons not have firearms, but I support their right to do so since the RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS is a natural born right of free men EVERYWHERE. To believe otherwise is just one step down that slippery slope...So does the prohibition on felons owning guns and 5-year-olds owning handguns. Right? Shall not be infringed.
I've never been comfortable with someone carrying the burden of their crime around their neck for their entire life.Correct... When the Founding Fathers said "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED", they provided NO EXCEPTIONS... Sometimes you have to stand up for the principle of things... Maybe I would prefer that violent felons not have firearms, but I support their right to do so since the RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS is a natural born right of free men EVERYWHERE. To believe otherwise is just one step down that slippery slope...
Plus, there's the issue of a lot of things have been made felonies these days that were not even illegal when many of us had a bit more spring in our step...I've never been comfortable with someone carrying the burden of their crime around their neck for their entire life.
In my view, it is WRONG to deny someone the right to vote or the protections of the Bill of Rights after they have done their time.
Sure they did; you can't just stop reading at the Second Amendment. The Fifth Amendment provides:When the Founding Fathers said "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED", they provided NO EXCEPTIONS.
Felons have received due process, and have forfeited various civil rights as a result of their conviction. This is not, and should not, be unconstitutional.No person shall be [...] deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law