P95Carry
Moderator Emeritus
Thank Pax for your mod comments - unfortunately as I mentioned on this post of mine we always seem to finish up with ''them and us'' on any LE posts - eventually!
Have anything besides rhetoric to back this claim up, "quotations" or no? Comments like that are incendiary and hardly an example of taking the High Road.Anyone surprised?
I'm not.
SOP for "police" in the United States.
Yes, it's working this time. However, I'm forced to wonder: would it have worked sans audiocasette? rdbrowning, in a previous post, said he heard a similar story, and dismissed it out-of-hand. We are naturally inclined to do so, because we are naturally inclined to believe that police are good people (and the vast majority of them, in fact, are); what, then, of the people who actually are victimized by police, but don't have this sort of evidence?I'm as horrified as anyone else by this, but its a good example of the system working.
Ok. That's not true. Don't squander a good argument with obvious hyperbole. It makes it so much easier to dismiss you completely.NEWS FLASH: YOUR KIDS CAN GET POT AND COCAINE EASIER THAN THEY CAN GET CIGARETTES AND BOOZE.
What about meth? Do you just suggest we quit trying to bust methlabs?
If you want to debate the rate of drug addiction caused by legalization, or the social cost, etc, that's a different debate entirely.