Pizza Guy follow up with autopsy report.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Night Guy

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2003
Messages
197
Location
Indianapolis, IN
Reference the discussion here...http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?s=&threadid=82654

Here's the latest story on how things are deveoping. It doesn't sound great for a self defense case.:rolleyes:

http://www.indystar.com/articles/6/148662-1276-103.html

Autopsy: Shots hit man on ground
Most of 15 bullets fired hit the alleged would-be robber after he fell, official says.


By Terry Horne and John Tuohy
[email protected]
May 22, 2004


Preliminary autopsy results indicate that a pizza deliveryman, who claimed he killed a would-be robber in self-defense, may have fired many of the shots after his alleged assailant fell to the ground.

"It's believed the majority of those (bullets) may have gone into him while he was on the ground," Acting Chief Deputy Marion County Coroner John Linehan said Friday.

Linehan said Dr. Stephen Radentz has completed his autopsy but is reviewing his notes before submitting his findings to investigators and Marion County prosecutors.

Roger Rayl, a spokesman for Marion County Prosecutor Carl Brizzi, said prosecutors are waiting on additional information, which he declined to discuss, before deciding whether to file any charges.

The deliveryman, Ronald Honeycutt, 38, Carmel, told The Indianapolis Star he fired all 15 rounds of his 9 mm gun at close range when Jerome Brown-Dancler came toward him Monday night and raised a gun at him.

Honeycutt said he continued to fire his gun because Brown-Dancler just stood there. Honeycutt said he couldn't tell whether the bullets were even striking him.

Linehan said that would have been impossible.

"There's no way someone could be standing up after being shot so many times," he said.

Linehan said Radentz's examination has been unusually long because of the number of wounds Radentz had to examine. Linehan said the angles of entry led examiners to conclude that Honeycutt fired some of his shots after Brown-Dancler had fallen.

Brown-Dancler, of the 6200 block of East 11th Street, died a short time later at Methodist Hospital, according to authorities.

Honeycutt said he had just finished making a delivery about 11 p.m. Monday in the 3600 block of Long Wharf Drive on the Far Eastside when Brown-Dancler came at him briskly.

He said he was just getting into his van when Brown-Dancler appeared to go for a gun.

Friday, Honeycutt said the bullets entered Brown-Dancler's body at a downward angle because he was standing on the floorboard of the van when he fired.

"I'm 6-foot- 2, and I was elevated because I was halfway in the van," Honeycutt said. "I was maybe 7 {1frac2} feet up in the air, with my arm over the top of the door, shooting downward."

Honeycutt reiterated that all his bullets were spent before he even approached Brown-Dancler to grab the victim's gun. He said Brown-Dancler remained standing until the last bullet was fired.

"He fell down on his left side, and his arm was the last to hit the ground because his gun was pointed upward at me the whole time," Honeycutt said.

He said he was disappointed that the coroner had reached another conclusion.

"I thought that in this world in this day and age they would be able to figure this out," he said. "That is their opinion, but they are wrong."

Shaunika Jackson, Brown-Dancler's sister, concluded after hearing the corner's report: "He (Honeycutt) deliberately set out to murder my little brother."

"It isn't fair that he is at home with his family and my brother is in a coffin," Jackson said.

RaShaad Germany, Brown-Dancler's brother, said he thought it was "heinous" if Honeycutt shot his brother after he was down. "I'd call that flat-out murder."

Brown-Dancler's mother, Esther Birden-Jones, said she was hopeful that the new information leads to an arrest and conviction.

"Then at least my son would not have died in vain, and it wouldn't be like no one cares," she said.

Birden-Jones said Honeycutt, at the very least, should face charges for moving what he said was her son's gun from the scene of the crime. "You go to jail for leaving the scene of an accident."

Brown-Dancler, who dropped out of high school, was working on his general educational development certificate, she said. His favorite pastimes were basketball and home video games. "He was a big 20-year-old kid."

This spring, he and his brother, Germany, had started a lawn care business. They had about six to 10 customers, Germany said.

Birden-Jones said the hardest thing to understand is Honeycutt's apparent lack of sorrow about killing her son.

"My prayers go out to that family. Whether he's got any remorse or not, he's got to deal with God one day."

Call Star reporter Terry Horne at (317) 444-6082.
 
Not a single word about the fact that their beloved relative (who apparently was nothing short of a treasure to his community and family :) ) died trying to rob someone at gunpoint...

Well, I didn't really expect it. I guess a civil suit is already on its way...


Trooper


[Edited for grammar errors]
 
Last edited:
Honeycutt said he continued to fire his gun because Brown-Dancler just stood there. Honeycutt said he couldn't tell whether the bullets were even striking him....
---------------------------------------quote-------------------------------------------------

Officers in my dept are trained to "Shoot until they fall from your sight picture". The coroner said it would be "impossible" to stand there with that many rounds in you. He bases that on to many movies. I dont know if pizza boy was right or wrong, i wasn't there. he can shoot to win though....:)
 
RaShaad Germany, Brown-Dancler's brother, said he thought it was "heinous" if Honeycutt shot his brother after he was down. "I'd call that flat-out murder."

I'd call that good defense tactics.

"Then at least my son would not have died in vain, and it wouldn't be like no one cares," she said.

He didn't die in vain, he died while committing a felony.

It isn't fair that he is at home with his family and my brother is in a coffin," Jackson said.

Brown-Dancler tried to play a rough game and met a rough end. SOunds fair to me.


And another thing....
The fact that he was not dead at the scene may be a good indicator all shots were warranted. Shoot until the threat has been eliminatd.

Smoke
 
GAHHHHH!!!!!!!! )&^)*&^%&*^$*%#$&^#%$#^%$#^%@$^#&^%)!!!!!!!!!!!

Her son tried to rob someone at gunpoint and now she's praying for HIM 'cause "he's got to deal with God one day" ... I'm not religious but I'd hope to heck that God would say something along the lines of "thanks for taking care of what I gave you by keeping the holes outta it".

Cheese and crackers this guy may have slide locked and acted the fool afterwards but he was in immediate danger.

I hope I never haver to shoot ANYONE but I would keep shooting if I thought he could still harm me, even if he WAS on the ground doesn't mean he can't kill me if he's armed.
 
If he did shoot the guy after he fell, it still might have been considered justifiable because even a wounded man can still pull a trigger.

What's going to hurt him is if he lied to the investigators about it.

Looks to me like it'll all depend upon if the reconstruction of the incident shows his story is plausible with the angle of the entry wounds.

If not, lying to the cops is going to prove costly.
 
I have attended a conference where the FBI's guy in charge of their "use of force" policy briefed us. The FBI developed a policy of "shoot to stop."

Not "Shoot to kill"
Not "Shoot to wound"
Not "Shoot to disarm"

Shoot to stop.

He said that means that if an FBI agent (who, according to him, is highly trained on what constitutes a threat to his life) feels like his life is threatened, he is authorized to draw and shoot until the bad guy stops coming at him. Whether it takes 1 round or 15. And if the shooting is justified, the FBI will back their man, even if it took 15 rounds.

Now, that sounds like common sense over-riding political correctness. And I like it.

[edited for typo]
 
This pizza deliveryman he was on the job making a delivery when the shootout took place. Therefore there will be no shortage of lawyers willing to try out the legal theory on the behalf of the deceased that the deep-pocketed Pizza Hut Corp. shares responsiblility for the shooting.
 
Shaunika Jackson, Brown-Dancler's sister, concluded after hearing the corner's report: "He (Honeycutt) deliberately set out to murder my little brother."

Yep. He called in the order himself, then went out looking for your little bro, just so he could shoot him, lose his job, and wind up in this mess. Shaunika, you just outwitted a criminal mastermind..... :rolleyes:
 
Shaunika Jackson, Brown-Dancler's sister, concluded after hearing the corner's report: "He (Honeycutt) deliberately set out to murder my little brother."
Sigh :eek:

I am SOOOOO sick and tired on low-lifes and prosectors alike characterizing any action that results in loss of life as "murder."

"Murder" by definition requires intention to kill, and usually some degree of premeditation. This guy was accosted when he returned to his vehicle. He had no way of knowing the "victim" was even on the planet. To me this looks (based on information available) like a good shoot, but if they decide to charge him, the very worst that might be a justifiable charge would be something based on using too many shots to neutraize the threat -- maybe something like manslaughter.

I would hope if he gets charged his lawyer is smart/good enough to be sure he doesn't get tried in front of a racially biased jury, and that he gets acquitted.

And I REALLY wish the pizza guy would talk to a lawyer and stop talking to the press.
 
Smoke!

"The fact that he was not dead at the scene may be a good indicator all shots were warranted. Shoot until the threat has been eliminated."

I can't possibly agree more! And the fact that he still had to remove the gun from the guy after slidelock.... I'd say the old boy was still a threat.

What the article meant to say...:rolleyes:

such a tradgedy that youngsters can't rob a guy these days without this sort of thing happening.

or

I hope that this young man's loss of life will not be in vain but instead, breath new life into anti gun legislation. after all our little darling would never do this sort of thing... it was that #@$#% gun that made him do it.
 
As far as Pizza Hut being held responable, there are good points and bad.

As he was violating Pizza Hut's policy and was fired for it, I'd say that most people couldn't hold PH responsable. On the other hand, this could result in having more companies having a no gun policy to cover their butts.

If they sue, we should have a strong decision stating that it was the employee's decision to draw and fire, regardless of PH's policy. As PH is not a defense/guard/firearm company, they shouldn't be expected to train employees in any sort of self-defense policy.

Then we need a company sued because of their no-gun policy resulted in a person being defenseless against an assault (which the company didn't do anything realistic to prevent). This would result in companies having to examine their risk reduction policies with the view that 'If we ban guns, and a sicko comes in and shoots people, we'll be held responsable for not having armed guards', while if they allow people the means for self-defense, their risk is reduced.
 
Last edited:
Then we need a company sued because of their no-gun policy resulted in a person being defenseless against an assault (which the company didn't do anything realistic to prevent). This would result in companies having to examine their risk reduction policies with the view that 'If we ban guns, and a sicko comes in and shoots people, we'll be held responsable for not having armed guards', while if they allow people the means for self-defense, their risk is reduced.
PRECISELY
 
The coroner said:
"There's no way someone could be standing up after being shot so many times," he said.

I understand that a coroner has to offer his opinion occassionally, but shouldn't it be based on fact? Sometime, somewhere there has been a person who has taken multiple hits yet kept on running.

As for the pizza man, he needs to STF up!!
 
anyone else remember that

"legendary" IHP shooting that wiped out a doped-up biker after about the same count of 9mm hits? He was big and on PCP, I think--simply kept coming.

It was the first serious "questioning" of 9mm adequacy, I think--maybe twenty years old.
 
The ISP shooting was something on the order of 31 to 33 hits with 9x19mm JSP, followed by two 12ga. slugs. The last slug snapped the spine and hit the heart.
 
Another dastardly case of pizza delivery man brutality.

Man, this is ugly.

Family loyalty is a beautiful thing but do they really believe that the Pizza Guy set out to intentionally murder the deceased? That he had no reason to fire?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top