jimbo555
Member
I'm happy with my ruger lc9,it can fit in most pockets but I prefer a simple slide holster owb. I carry a walther tph always in a pocket.
If reliabilty is the main concern then What tihs guy said ^^^^ ...Sure I carry a 1911 but I don't leave home without the 442 in the pocket.S&W J-frame (revolver)...
Hated the heavy pull on the PM9 & traded it. I'd highly recommend the KelTec PF-9 for a pocket carry. Thin, light weight, and only 5lb trigger pull. Plus, the recoil is very doable.Guys, I'm a little overwhelmed by the positive remarks in regards to the, pm/cm line of kahrs. I owned a CW and it was the biggest hunk of junk IMO. No metal tabs for the slide to ride on, and the take down is crap too.
Anyone have these problems with the other kahrs.
I owned both and after I got a PM9 I couldn't wait to get rid of the PF9.Hated the heavy pull on the PM9 & traded it. I'd highly recommend the KelTec PF-9 for a pocket carry. Thin, light weight, and only 5lb trigger pull. Plus, the recoil is very doable.
Do you happen to have a side by side or comparision photo of the Ruger and Walther THP?I'm happy with my ruger lc9,it can fit in most pockets but I prefer a simple slide holster owb. I carry a walther tph always in a pocket.
Yeah blame that on me. I have shot the LC9 so I know what it feels like in my hand. Just wanted to see what they looked like side by side to get a feel for the true size of the TPH since I have never seen one in person. I am really interested in them thoughIt is unfair to compare the size of the Walther TPH vs. the Ruger LC9. One is a tiny .22 that belongs in the pocket and the other is a 9mm large enough for holster wear.