Recommended Bolt Action Rifle and Caliber

Status
Not open for further replies.
Anyone owning a Remington 700 which doesn’t function safely really doesn’t have any excuses. .

I saw an interesting video made by a gray-beard gunsmith who -- somewhat convincingly -- made the case that the widespread problem with the Remington trigger / safety was simply a problem with maintenance. That still doesn't change the fact that the company has lost / settled multiple lawsuits regarding the alleged faulty design, and there's the multiple bankruptcy / change in ownership issue. Other companies have had problems as well, of course, but none seems to have had as much misfortune as Remington and their Model 700, which from my perspective operates as a massive negative PR campaign in respect to that product particularly in light of the superb and relatively problem-free alternatives that exist.
 
Last edited:
To the OP’s question, and well considered criteria:

Short version:

Find a Ruger American Ranch, Howa 1500 or CZ 527 in 6.5 Grendel or 6mm ARC and live happy. Tolerating more expense and recoil, almost any rifle in 6 or 6.5 creed, 243win, 7-08, would be a small step which adds a LOT of options to your list, however.

Personally, I’d be getting a Ruger American Ranch in 6 ARC when available, or 6.5 Grendel, with a very close second to a Savage 10/110 or Ruger American in 6.5 Creed - preferring an AICS mag compatible model, AND conceding I would probably swap it into a Boyd’s laminate wood stock, giving me options for a bottom metal change if so desired.

Long version:

Items 2, 3, and 5 are about the chosen cartridge. 6 arc, 6.5 Grendel, 6 and 6.5 creed, 243win, 7-08 are largely the only cartridges which I’d be considering in your shoes.

Items 1, 3 (somewhat), 4, 6, and 7 are about the chosen rifle. Lots and lots of options - the price is the criteria which culls the list the most, and will be the biggest limiter in your search. $500 gets you close, but it’s pretty hard today to satisfy.

Line by line:

7) Conceding immediately that removing #7 from consideration: 1) opens your options significantly -as in only about 5% of the market would have fit #7, whereas 95# of the market could be considered if you drop #7 as a requirement - and 2) shooting with irons at 300yrds is highly dependent upon your target - past generations thought shooting at 300yrds was very difficult largely because they were shooting irons (or poor scopes) and didn’t realize their self imposed limitations...

1) Remarkably easy to satisfy. Most models on the market for the last 20yrs are capable of delivering MOA or sub-MOA accuracy. Pretty hard to screw that one up. Ruger, Tikka, CZ, Savage, Winchester, Browning, Howa, Weatherby... pick your poison... personally, the only brands/rifles I would not buy would be Remington and any mil-surp rifle.

2) Other than rimfire ammo, almost all cartridges can be reloaded. SOME cartridges have more or less market support than others, or have nuances which frustrate reloaders, but virtually everything can be reloaded. 7.62x39mm is one which has some headaches; the .311” bullet is frustrating, with very limited market support. Many guys do shoot .308” bullets in x39’s, but there are prettier girls to dance with anyway, so I wouldn’t bother.

3) Hunting requires more momentum on impact than target shooting, but for 100yrds, even 300yrds, this really only knocks off the 22cal centerfires. 223rem will do the job, but it comes with some concessions which don’t apply to larger bore diameter cartridges. Hunting deer at 100yrds and less is an easy task, even 300yrds and less, so there’s not much sense in burning more powder, losing more lead/copper, or tolerating more recoil than needed. No 300win mags or 7 rem mags need apply here.

4) Many, many more models are available today than even 10-15yrs ago with detachable magazines. Some detachable magazines are better than others, especially in the context of casual plinking and hunting, opposed to high volume, high intensity shooting. I personally prefer rifles to be AICS magazine compatible, but I doubt that’s critical for your use.

5) To me, this is a non-criteria. The Non-compatible set is null. A 22LR can easily be shot out to 300yrds, so to use any centerfire rifle just makes life easier. 300yrds, when not shooting 22LR, is 223rem territory for me. But conceding to #3 above, a 6 ARC or 6.5 Grendel as a minimum standard for “no limitations” hunting is where I would look, and where I would buy.

6) Most major brands will offer a model in the $500 and under ballpark, if not, many more options are available in the used market. You might not get a detachable magazine with a sub-$500 base model these days, but if you can 1) buy used or 2) scrounge up another $200, you’ll find several options.
 
Anyone owning a Remington 700 which doesn’t function safely really doesn’t have any excuses. It’s the most well and widely known rifle action on the market with the most aftermarket and industry service support, and some of the heaviest factory safety recall scrutiny of any model on the market. Despite varying QA/QC issues in multiple eras of their history, AND of course, acknowledging any company will produce lemons, especially those which produce a significant proportion of the market volume, Remington has typically done a very good job at customer service and support, AND they’ve been backed into corners any time they have a design safety issue. Low confidence in a trigger? Let Remington replace it for free - OR buy any of a hundred aftermarket options.

I certainly wouldn’t buy a new one today and don’t plan to in the future with their current ownership, but there’s really no excuse to leave a Remington without proper function.
I’ve had it a long time. I’ve had Remington (when it was the same ownership that made the rifle) fix the trigger, and a gunsmith fix the other issue, and a few I’ve fixed myself. My point: if there are that many, there are probably more that I haven’t found yet. I agree, if I were just making a random complaint, it would be my lack of research that necessitated it. That’s why I pointed out that the comment was a warning, not company bashing.
 
A CZ 527 carbine in 7.62x39 would fit the bill it seems, and it has iron sights. 300 yards will be a stretch, but you could probably do it if you are reloading and just doing it for the challenge (not shooting game). It is a good 100 yard deer cartridge with the proper bullets - i.e. not steel case surplus stuff. Despite the reputation for not being terribly accurate due to its use in semi auto rifles that weren't designed for accuracy, and cheap steel case ammo that similarly can be inconsistent, my 7.62x39 is amazingly accurate at 100 yards.

Edit to add - the CZ might be over your budget, but not by a whole lot if you look for a deal. They are worth the money IMO.
Don't they make the CZ-527 in 6.5x55? Better choice for the 7 requirements.
 
When I was in OP's situation I bought a Remington SPC in 223. 223/556 with old fashion 12:1 twist is just fine out to 300 yards. A Burris 3x9 or 4.5x14 budget scope will work well. 223/556 is much cheaper than the boutique rounds some here are pushing.
 
Don't they make the CZ-527 in 6.5x55? Better choice for the 7 requirements.

I don't think so, that would be too long for the mini Mauser action. You can get a 527 American in 6.5 Grendel, but it doesn't have iron sights. The carbine (with iron sights) is only available in .223 and 7.62x39. My personal preference as between those two for deer would be the 7.62 hence my suggestion, but the .223 could work too.
 
If you already have a 308 and want something different, you can't go wrong with 243. I have a 6mm Rem that I really like, but just can't get the 18" thin barrel to do too good of accuracy after 2 - 3 shots. My next rifle may be a longer thicker barrel in 6mm Rem, as I have a lot of components to reload for it and it would be great for bench shooting. The 6mm Rem is just a tad hotter than the 243. I would think the 243 would be great for deer out to 300 yards and it would be awesome to shot 20 - 40 shots on the bench without any fatigue. Plus 243 is pretty common and somewhat cheap to shoot.
 
I don't think so, that would be too long for the mini Mauser action. You can get a 527 American in 6.5 Grendel, but it doesn't have iron sights. The carbine (with iron sights) is only available in .223 and 7.62x39. My personal preference as between those two for deer would be the 7.62 hence my suggestion, but the .223 could work too.

Thanks - I have the .223. I picked it over the 7.62 because I also have a good supply of ammo. Your assessment is quite correct.
 
Hokkmike, my 527 American is in .223 as well, fantastic rifle. I have a Howa Mini Action in 7.62x39, also a fantastic rifle. I would be hard pressed to pick a favorite between the two. Fortunately, I don't need to, and hope to add another soon. Maybe a Grendel, but I am intrigued by 6mm ARC too. Bolt action rifles in "intermediate" cartridges are definitely high in terms of shooting enjoyment, at least in my book. I always recommend one to someone looking to fill an empty space in thier safe.
 
A Tikka T-3 would fit the bill quite nicely. Used, around $400. you pick the scope and the caliber. Usually target shooting and hunting are at opposite corners of the ring, so I would say .308 would be a nice compromise. T-3s come from the factory shooting MOA or better and they are extremely well built guns.
 
I have an older Remington 700 in 30-06 that had a bad finish on the stock I bought for $200 OTD. I stripped the stock and refinished. I wanted an iron sighted gun and the older Remingtons came with good factory sights. But I removerd the rear sight and added a Williams Guide Sight to the rifle. I love the set up. I like being able to wrap my hand around the rifle without a scope interfering with the grip.

My gun was made in 1968 IIRC. There are still lots of older Remingtons for sale on GB and they turn up in pawn shops and gun shops all the time. Caliber isn't that important. Anything from a 243 on up will be fine. The 308 is a good round but one of the first to disappear during a panic. I like the 30-06 because the case is so well suited to shooting lead bullets and the 308 isn't.

The only thing a gun like I recommended wont do is have a hi cap detachable magazine. But shooting from a bench its not needed or really wanted. They can get in the way. The Remington 700 is easily scoped if you decide to use a scope.
 
I have several Remington 700s, an older BDL in 25-06, an SPS in 270WSM, and a Classic in .270. Never any issues with any of them. All do a great job on game. In fact my 25-06 has taken more Elk than my Ruger 77MKII in .300WM which is my designated elk gun. I also have other 77s as I like them too, a red pad in .243 Heavy barrel, and a Stainless Sporter in 30-06.
As for the OPs requirements, my Ruger American in 7.62x39 will do all he is asking for minus #7..
 
If I were to only want it for target shooting or remove deer from the hunting list this would be the obvious choice. I’m looking into a Ruger American either Ranch (5.56) or Predator (223). The only reason for the longer barrel would be the velocity increase. However for targets put to 300 and game smaller than deer (coyotes or varmints) that doesn’t really matter much.
 
I’ve heard a lot of good things about the CZ rifles. I’ve not used a rifle in 7.62x39. I hear the CZs are chambered in such a way as to make the most of the common steel cased ammo available.

Yes, that is correct about the x39 CZ chamber. It's tight, not so sloppy as the average AK or SKS. The chamber conforms to European C.I.P. standards of course, so even relatively inexpensive Russian made x39 performs remarkably well. More expensive brass case x39 like Lapua from Finland does as well. So do my handloads.

No ammo is cheap at the moment, but it's temporary. The crisis will pass and things will be more affordable again.

The CZ 527 in 7.62x39 satisfies your list of desirables in your original post. I bought mine new for just over $600.00, but I got lucky with an auction that ended in the middle of the night. You may see they're a little pricier for now, but those prices will come down eventually.

Though I've handled many rifles/carbines chambered in 7.62x39, this is only the second rifle chambered in that caliber I've owned. I spent about 2 years looking before I made the choice. I also looked at the Ruger 77, Savage 110, Howa 1500 mini action, and Ruger American Ranch. After the smoke cleared the 527 was calling my name... and here we are.

One thing I see over and over on different gun forums is a real lack of knowledge when it comes to 7.62x39. It's underrated and mischaracterized in so many ways. I get tempted to join every forum where I see the myths being perpetuated to clue people in, but I don't have the time.

The semi-auto Ruger Mini-30 is a capable 225-yard deer rifle with the right loads. A CZ bolt gun chambered in x39 is even more capable. If you want to reach out to 500 yards for paper and steel targets you can do that too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top