Remington R1 1911?

Status
Not open for further replies.

marine 97-03

Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
884
Location
Tuscaloosa, Alabama
So I've been looking at 1911's again and the R1 looks like its for me...why you ask...well it looks to be a quality build and will be a good base to turn it into a nice custom gun sights are dove tailed so changing them out will be a snap what's y'alls thoughts on the R1??
 
Big fan of mine. No issues in 500 or so rounds. It shoots as accurate as my FIL's Colt and Kimber

Here is mine with some Buffalo horn grips

7360669214_d215d8c7d8_z.png

7360669508_798fd3b82c_z.jpg
 
I recently bought an R1 Enhanced as my "nice" 1911 and 200'ish rounds into it I could not be happier.

It was primarily due to handling and inspecting, but not shooting, a GI style R1 that I went with the enhanced model. For the money Remington put together a rather nicely done gun.
 
Unless they've stopped over cutting the VIS and started leaving the correct gap between barrel and feed ramp I'd say pass. You'll likely have feed issues and you'll assuredly have shortened barrel life. Ditto any replacement barrel short of a ramped one.

If you want a GI style 1911 buy a 1991 Colt and be done with it.
 
Aside from the rather large rollstamp, I do like the vertical rear serratings on the slide...they look 'right'. I have never been a fan of the canted serrations seen on other 1911's.
 
My son has between 500 and 1000 rounds through his so far and loves it. The only issue is with the factory mags not engaging the slide stop when empty. That happens over half the time. Wilson mags do not have that problem.
 
My dad and I have over 5,000 rounds through his without a single malfunction. It shoots just as good as the sigs, kimbers, and paras I've had.
 
Ah, just revisited that one. So, to reply to the stocking Remington Dealer???: if you get a new one it should be corrected but I'd certainly ask to see first. I really didn't and still don't understand the defense of an obvious flaw, even Remington took steps to amend it. Saying the new one is not much worse than a Ruger means relatively little.

Still no word on the barrel to feed ramp issue...
 
Skylerbone said:
So, to reply to the stocking Remington Dealer???

Is that supposed to be me? I have access to more firearms than most, but I certainly don't sell them for a living. For the record, I wouldn't buy an R1 for various reasons, but I'm not going to dissuade others from buying one with inaccurate information. I'll leave that to you and all that you've read since you seem to be so good at it.
 
Then kindly pronounce the VIS and barrel length as both good to go, call me an uninformed Internet troll who can't read the print and we'll be done discussing things here.

Now to quote my original reply with emphasis on the first word:
Unless they've stopped over cutting the VIS and started leaving the correct gap between barrel and feed ramp I'd say pass.

To the OP: I'd love to tell you the R1 is a great pistol and a great bargain to base a custom build on but I simply cannot pronounce it so. More smiths use Caspians, Colts and Springfields than any other and many will not accept any other. As my local pistolsmith worked for both the Springfield Armory Custom Shop and Les Baer I can say Colt's small parts quality is decidedly better than SA's and comparing the price differences between a forged Colt made in the USA to the other two gives me no pause in recommending a Colt for your purposes. Truth be told I could care less about the name, what I care about is a decently priced, correctly machined (frame holes, trigger track length and yes VIS) that can be modified. If you had $1,100 to spare I'd recommend a DW Herritage as a well built 1911 that looks better and is fit better than any we have discussed to now.
 
I picked up an R1 standard last month. I wanted a US-made GI-style 1911 with decent sights. Basically, the two contenders in this arena are the Colt and the R1. Well, I already have a Colt (MK IV stainless), the R1 has better sights, and I didn't see anything that makes the Government model worth an extra $300 over the R1.

I'm very happy with mine. I took it out of the box, wiped it down inside and out, put some clp on the contact surfaces and went shooting. It has run flawlessly thus far.
 
Dont do it

You might want to know something......The R1 is a 1911 style , but alot of parts are not interchangeable with a regular 1911 but are proprietary only to Remington R1's. Thats why I didnt buy one. Get a Ruger SR 1911 instead...Its built AS a 1911 , not some factorys version OF a 1911. RUGER got it right ! Remington got it wrong ! Just my 2 cents.
 
Last edited:
You might want to know something......The R1 is a 1911 style , but alot of parts are not interchangeable with a regular 1911 but are proprietary only to Remington R1's. Thats why I didnt buy one. Get a Ruger SR 1911 instead...Its built AS a 1911 , not some factorys version OF a 1911. RUGER got it right ! Remington got it wrong ! Just my 2 cents.

What parts are those?
 
The barrel for one , check it out yourself

I did some searching and can't find anything. Everything I read tends to say parts are interchangeable. I am not trying to be argumentative I am honestly curious. What parts are different? What is the difference between the R1 barrel and a standard 1911 barrel?
 
someone said not interchangeable parts? not sure how they figured that since all parts between my r1 and springfield gi seem pretty interchangeable. The extractor from the factory worked, but would not extract live rounds unless they were very very short. A hardcore extractor fixed that, no fitting, just dropped in. Thats my only complaint. The new extractor is slightly below flush, but not too bad. The Grips are very well made, and from a good pattern or wood on mine. Finish is very good. Fit could be better, but is still decent. The sights will work themselves loose after a few hundred rounds, so youll need to locktite them down when there sighted in. My barrels are interchangeable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top