Rifle build for NRA AR Tactical class

Status
Not open for further replies.
I see that the Rise Armament trigger is single stage. Many double stage triggers can be/are set up to take up most of the weight in the first stage with a second stage on the order of 1 1/2 #. If you're used to ounces it might take some practice but it's better than 4 1/2 all at once. Geissele is probably the most popular now.

I should have gone with a 2 stage trigger
 
Stopped at the range to get in a little practice with this rig. The only changes I’ve made so far was the addition of a Ergo grip and an old cheek pad I had laying around

DAD30058-7391-42BC-9AEB-90212E572D31.jpeg

I basically threw a dart at the Sierra reloading manual and picked 25.1g of VV N140 with the 69g SMKs

I settled in at 100 yards and after some foulers shot 10 rounds. During the string I was making adjustments to my interface with the rifle, noting what yielded the most consistent results.

6CC3E2DB-55DB-44AC-8E9A-2C710B684DB1.jpeg

I continued for the 2nd 10 rounds. Kept my position behind the rifle consistent and worked on cheek weld and trigger squeeze

9C1BBDC7-3891-4428-A541-BE2F4AD4D820.jpeg

By the 3rd string I felt like I had figured out a few things and focused on shot to shot repeatability

944A9277-C29C-4501-901B-0BD083410A1C.jpeg

Bottom line: the rifle has the accuracy potential to do well at 600 yards if I can drive it. The 4 1/2lb trigger is the biggest impediment. I ordered this 2 stage trigger from LaRue, which I hope will fix the issue

https://www.larue.com/products/larue-tactical-mbt-2s-straight-bow-trigger/
 
+1 on the LaRue MBT-2, 4.5lbs. Especially if your budget doesn't agree with a Geissele.
To the OP, I just got a box of those Berger 85 LRHTs to try out.

Great stock for prone. You need to use the included spacer for a carbine buffer with the Gen3 if its not obvious.
The older gen had a simple flat head retaining screw at the back of the buffer tube. It's now a spanner wrench type. I think the Gen3s are also lighter weight.
 
Getting a sub MOA 10 shot group with an undeveloped load and 4 1/2lb trigger has me excited to see how much more I can squeeze out of it.

Yes as the # shots go up the chances for error do to. When I saw that group I was impressed. I’ve not had many developed loads do any better. If that were me I’d probably call it good :)

Proof that a lot of rifles are capable if the shooter is.

Nice shooting !

Jeff
 
I went to the range today hoping to finish my load test for the 85.5 Berger’s and encountered another problem.

Either my scope isn’t holding zero or these bullets aren’t stable in this barrel.

POA was the dot on the right. First shot hit at 10 o’clock, next 2 impacted on the next dot over.

4966EBE8-1C26-4362-BBF5-0C6674E9CF1E.jpeg

Next group, POA was right dot, all 3 shots impacted on the left dot.

24405521-1729-4DB5-AB6A-DEC7B9EFB5C6.jpeg

My plan is to swap scopes and see if that’s the issue. If the problem persists then maybe it’s the barrel. I would think a 1:7 20” barrel would stabilize these bullets. Maybe it’s not 1:7 as advertised? Won’t know until I start eliminating variables.

I am leaning toward the scope. It doesn’t seem to be answering the helm when I make adjustments. The reticle is moving but impacts don’t seem to be correlating as they should. The mount is solid, or seems to be.

Any other ideas?
 
Got to thinking about this some more. I’m still going to swap scopes in order to rule out a scope malfunction but as I’m sitting at the reloading bench trying to decide what to load the question of bullet stability came back into my mind.

I verified that I do indeed have a 1:7 twist using a tight patch on a cleaning rod and counting the revolutions. 1 revolution over 7 inches traveled. All good there.

The barrel length should only matter relative to how much speed you can generate with it so I took the chrono data from my first load test:

VV N140

23.4g = 2,527fps, ES 14, SD 6
23.7g = 2,612fps, ES 25, SD 12
24.0g = 2,662fps, ES 22, SD 9
24.3g = 2,680fps, ES 16, SD 7
24.6g = 2,720fps, ES 16, SD 8
24.9g = 2,733fps, ES 22, SD 9 (pressure signs here, there’s my limit)

Using the middle of the range charge weight of 24.3g, 2,680fps, 80 deg F, I plugged the 85.5 bullet into the Berger calculator and got this result:

D71AA876-652A-4F0E-A4E2-8AAF8D753B7F.jpeg

Stability shouldn’t be the problem, so I’m back to thinking either my Leupold Mk4 LTR has taken a dump or the rifle doesn’t like the 85.5 / N 140 combo or something is amiss with the rifle itself.
 
N 140 should be a good powder for this bullet. From Vihtavuori’s website:

3B389567-5A95-4095-88EC-741A043297AE.jpeg

I also have N 150 but I don’t think I could get enough of it in the case to reach the velocity I need.
 
Update:

Finally got to my first 600 yard AR tactical match today.

B6569108-DFAE-4758-A339-62F2926E9B17.jpeg

The load I settled on was 77 SMKs and 24.4gn of N140. It performed pretty well.

Since I haven’t had much time to practice I took my time on the first match getting settled and messing with my shooting position. My score reflected it. Time expired with 3 rounds left and I had to take zeros on those.

That sorting out helped my second match score, which was much better with a 198 and 9 X’s

Conditions got tricky by the third match and I missed a couple of wind calls. Still, I netted a 196 with 5 X’s

Bottom line: I think this could be a great entree for those that would like to try competitive shooting but might be a bit intimidated by the unknown.
 
Update:

I shot my second match a couple of weeks ago and noticed accuracy issues that I couldn’t attribute to missed wind calls.

Went to the range yesterday with the goal of ruling out loads and anything else obvious. Whatever was effecting accuracy at the match became abysmal at the range.

As it turns out the hand guard was installed incorrectly and was putting pressure on the gas tube. It was also slightly loose. After re-installing it the right way I ran into another problem where the gas key no longer aligned with the gas tube and the bolt wouldn’t go into battery.

After some more fiddling I finally got it in working order. Here’s the before (L) and after (R)

D7369756-9F37-46C8-8223-542F41713DA6.jpeg

Hard to believe but the proof is on the paper.

I also took @MCMXI ’s advice and installed a Magpul PRS gen 3 stock. Big difference. This configuration is rock solid

560A858A-4FE6-47A4-AF74-81B02AAC34AC.jpeg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top