Desertdog
Member
Turn your face the other way, quit, or I am sure other solutions can be found.
Rove Won't Be Charged in CIA Leak Case
- Thread starter Desertdog
- Start date
- Status
No you gave a laundry list without explaination. That is not examples.
Tell us what about those stories show bias by Fox.
I gave a detailed list of liberal employees that work for Fox. I gave examples of bias by other networks. I am hoping you will show us something viable to make your point.....you have yet to do it.
Camp David
member
Doug b said:
Perhaps you mistakenly believe Fox is propaganda simply because you have been suckled at the tit of liberal media so long that you can't spot the difference between the news and biased reporting. Liberals are fond of calling Fox propaganda yet they seemingly ignore MSNBC and ABC recklessly exhibiting left-wing bias on a decade basis... For the record, every news network is biased to some degree; most left, a few right, and damn fewer down the center. Objectivity in media is becomeing scarce. However, I won't stand and let you hurl false allegations aginst Fox news without concrete evidence.... There is a reason Fox News is #1 in cable right now... decades of liberal bias in the major media have offered Fox free reign to offer alternatives to such liberal bias....such as fair & balanced reporting: A strange thing for the other media to compete against!!!
22-rimfire
Member
I believe Fox News is the most unbiased of all of the news organizations. The regulars that are conservative do not hide that fact in the least. Alan Colmes could never be labeled as a conservative. He works with Sean Hannity and they present opposing views of events; to me that is fair and balanced.
Carl Rove... no charges as it should be. Just think of all the expense and hassle that this witch hunt caused.
Scooter Libby... I hope the same happens as the whole thing is a crock. You can't have one politican lying and getting away with it and another being prosecuted. Not condoning lying under oath, you just have to be rational about things.
Carl Rove... no charges as it should be. Just think of all the expense and hassle that this witch hunt caused.
Scooter Libby... I hope the same happens as the whole thing is a crock. You can't have one politican lying and getting away with it and another being prosecuted. Not condoning lying under oath, you just have to be rational about things.
You have not fooled anyone here.......or impressed us. You made a baseless charge and won't back it up when asked to....I noticed you were were doing the same thing on the Ann Coulter thread. What you don't know about the Clinton's and their anti gun agenda is frightening.
Like what?!
You are hard to take serious. If you want to be taken serious then back up what you say. Thus far all you have done is bluster and whine. You are not going to win anyone over doing that....
Rimfire you talk about rationality, expense, and hassle, of Plamegate.How about the $73 million, 10 yr. "investigation" to find out Bill lied about having sex in the oval office that was really rational huh? Especially when he was "wagging the dog"about Bin laden.
DigitalWarrior
Member
he just fudged the truth under oath
HAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHA
HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAH'
AHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHHA
aaa
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA
ummmm yeah. Like that wouldn't get one of us plebes tossed in the clink.
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHA
HAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHA
HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAH'
AHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHHA
aaa
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA
ummmm yeah. Like that wouldn't get one of us plebes tossed in the clink.
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHA
Do you even know what you're talking about? The long term investigation was into Whitewater, and there have been multiple convictions out of that. The investigation into Clinton's perjury was a spin off, lasted for far less time, and resulted in a censure and loss of his license when it was determined that he had in fact perjured himself.
As for wagging the dog, you're not exactly making sense. If you're talking about Clinton passing up the opportunity to arrest Bin Laden (which he has admitted to doing), then that doesn't exactly support your case. Or perhaps you're discussing Clinton's launching of military strikes the day Lewinksy's testimony was revealed, or initiating an air war with Iraq to delay impeachment proceedings. If you are referencing that, then reminding us of how Clinton put US soldiers in harms' way and killed people to distract the public from his perjury and dishonoring of the office again is counterproductive.
As usual you have it wrong again......big surprise.
Actually it was about the President of the United States committing perjury in a Sexual harassment lawsuit brought by Paula Jones. You might remember all the sexual harrasment laws given us by liberals.
...Anyway the accusation was that a man in a superior position , Gov of Arkansas threatened a woman's job, who was a state employee if she did not give him what he wanted. In the trial they tried to establish that Clinton had a proclivity to do this. In the process he was asked about Lewinsky and lied........So yeah, justice was served just as the law envisioned. He committed a felony and he can not practice law....Pity he was not removed from office. He was a unqualified failure as President.
Your witty comebacks just dazzle me..... Still waiting for those examples of bias though. Not expecting any......though.
- Status
