Rubber grips and revolvers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nearly a year ago, I bought my dealer's new 696 & 296 - my first .44 Specials. The former for fun and as a house gun; the latter, for a CCW. The boot grips on the 296 left the backstrap - and hammer hump - uncovered. The rapid recoil with the 200gr Blazer GDjHP (~800fps from the 296.) in that 296 really whacks your hand's web, so I swapped the grips. What a difference! The 296 was then comfortable to shoot - and hit repeatedly better. Of course, the grip is longer, too, making CC of that big lite weight a bigger problem. I ordered the squared bottom version of the same UM's Combat grips for the 696 - it is happy now.

Interestingly, the 6" 66-6 I bought new in September came with those squared UM's grips while the 2" 10-11 I bought then as well came with the curved ones, a la the 696. They are great feeling grips.... make shooting 'fun'. But... I like the look of wood - so off those new UM's came. The 66 now sports smooth/finger grooved gonzalo alves Hogue monogrips while the 10 wears some service-style S&W Accessories wood boot-sized. They are both super with .38 Specials - my 158gr LSWC over 3.5gr T-teGroup works great. The 66 was equipped smooth so my wife would shoot .38's from it rather than grab my favorite plate gun, a 4" 625, also sporting smooth Hogue wood. The 10 makes a great house/truck/CCW with those 'proper' grips.

I also changed the stock Hogue rubber grips on my new 625 & 629 Mountain Guns out for the S&W Accessories #21991 square-conversion wood grips, feeling similar to my 20 yr old 24's grips. I don't shoot anything but normal .45 Colt or .44 Specials from those MG's... or I'd have to put rubber back on! For 'emphasis', I have a Ruger SRH in .454 with those excellent stock rubber/wood insert grips - superior ergonomics make it a joy to shoot hot .45 Colts or most .454's in - certainly much nicer even with the most stout .454's I have shot than a friend's 29 over 26 yr ago with the then stock wood grips - ouch... I still remember the blister & split web after three rounds.

I was diagnosed with 'repetitive motion syndrome', a k a 'carpal tunnel syndrome', some years ago after making thousands of pens, vases, and bowls by hand on a wood lathe... my chosen avocation upon retiring from college teaching. That ended that... I refused the surgical 'patch' and opted on diet modification, simple anti-inflammatories (aspirin & naproxin-sodium work for me), braces, and periodically changing what I used my hands for. Shooting, reloading ammo, cleaning - are all different enough to do that I have few RMS/CTS episodes now - even though I did not add them to my hobbies until after I developed the problem. The big problem is that the nerve damage is permenant... resulting in lowered hand strength and loss of feeling (... and, that throbbing!). Proper grips on those 'kickers' - like my SRH - are a requirement now. A lifetime of building models, model trains, working on electronics, woodworking, computer entry, etc - abraded the nerve bundle's sheath as it rubbed on the Carpal Tunnel's inside; a proper diet would have aided that sheath's toughness, but that is another story.

In summation... get backstrap-enclosing rubber grips - like those UM's Combats... or switch to .38's!

Merry Christmas to all!

Stainz
 
I put rubber grips on every gun that I shoot. Wood on the collectables. I can shoot a lot better with a rubber grip, but like the looks of a nice wood grip.
 
I like rubber for it's non-slip properties. Rubber might grab your shirt but it grabs your hand too. Wood might slip in your hand as well as it slips on your shirt. Gotta have your priorities, getting a grip is mine.

Besides that dontcha know BLACK GUNS are supposed to be scarey? :D
 
Eagle Grips' new Heritage line...

Not to get off on a rant here or anything... but such awesomely beautiful grips being removed from the product as a cost cutting measure is a retarded move. I think most anyone who given the choice would be willing to drop the extra 20 bucks for them from the factory rather than drop the better part of a hundred on aftermarket look alikes.
Well, thankfully we even have the aftermarket for them. They look good. The even feel good as I have handled a couple guns with those styled grips. They are wonderful.
I just can't justify 80 bucks for wood grips to replace my wood grips if you know what I mean.

But considering the worn Pachy grips I have on my 66 and the need to change them off for something less narrow... these are looking like the best option.
 
I have found that the rubber stocks tear at my hand on the heavy recoilers. I'm much more comfortable with well fitting smooth wood stocks. Now finding the right ones can be a chore sometimes, but well worth it to me. One day I will have a set custom made, but first I have to decide which revolver will get the deluxe treatment. Decisions decisions!!!
 
Yeah,I'm a ruuber guy too....although not as old as some out there I have arthritis,so the rubber grips are needed......although the stock grips on my SP101(rubber and plastic) have been ok.....I'm thinking about getting Houge's tho,I'm starting to shoot mostly 357's out of the little guy...:cool:
 
I guess I need to add this to clarify my stance re grips. I like the look and feel of wood - within bounds. My wood-bearing revolvers are all fed mild loads... my 629MG sees .44M cases @ .44 Special levels; my 66 sees .357's @ .38 Special levels; my 625 MG .45 ACP's; and my 625 MG has .45 Colt 'Cowboy Loads', as do my SA Ruger .45's. My real kicker, my .454 SRH, has it's shock-absorber mainly rubber OEM grips. My 296, a lite-weight bouncer, wears backstrap-enclosing rubber U.M.'s Combat grips, etc.

Wood just looks so much better...

Stainz
 
I like nice wood grips on my autos and revolvers-the revolvers especially,but a few hundred rounds thru the 3" 629 with the pretty- but- ineffective rosewood fingergrooves would leave the web of my hand bleeding.When I get my 5" 625,it will get the rosewoods off the 629 and now the 629 has Houge rubber mono grips...I don't like the looks and they add length,but they work for taming the recoil.
 
I put a Hogue rubber grip on my S&W model 1917. It was the best thing I could have done for that gun. It made a world of difference in the way it handled.
 
Yesterday, I went to the range to shoot the S&W66PC with 3" brl I got for Christmas. I fired PMC 158gr and a box of .38 reloads. The PMC loads were pretty stout, even with rubber grips and porting! Are lighter grain bullet loads easier on the hands? How about the 125 or 130 gr? I thought I saw a box of 110grain .357... what about those? The joints on my right hand are still sore.
 
The PMC loads were pretty stout, even with rubber grips and porting!

You might do better with Win. SilverTips. It's a milder .357mag load. Have you shot .357s before? A K-framed revolver with rubber stocks and porting should easily tame all but the heaviest hunting loads. Try the lighter bullets or switch to the +P .38sp.
 
admittedly, I'm more of a 1911 guy, but I'm interested in revolvers, too. It's funny, I've been shooting a Kimber Ultra Carry for years, with your basic 230 gr load, and it isn't near as punishing as that S&W66.

Thanks, I'll try the lighter loads.
 
There's a world of difference in a 230 grainer moving at 800fps vs 158 grainer moving at 1100 to 1200fps. The .45acp will shove or push while the .357mag will be more of a snap.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top