Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Ruger LC9 vs. S&W M&P9c

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Doug Add, Apr 9, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Doug Add

    Doug Add Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2003
    Messages:
    347
    Location:
    North Carolina
    My wife is in the process of deciding on her first carry gun, and these are the two that most interest her. Anyone have both who can offer some comparisons?

    Or, if you have one or the other, let me know your impressions of them. She is not a new shooter, has shot several handguns and calibers. Interestingly, her favorites when we were choosing a home defense handgun were my SIG P228 and a 5" 1911. Those are obviously too large for the purpose for which she wants this gun.
     
  2. 19-3Ben

    19-3Ben Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2006
    Messages:
    5,146
    Location:
    CT
    I had an M&P9c for a while. Very low recoil, and very accurate. Especially for a small gun.
     
  3. cyclopsshooter

    cyclopsshooter Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    2,241
    Location:
    The Shadow Knows...
    Vote M&P for comfort- only benefit of SR9 is the smaller size but the slide seems bulky in comparison to the frame- I went with the M&P40c :)
     
  4. Stover954rr

    Stover954rr Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2007
    Messages:
    209
    Location:
    NY
    depending on her frame the lc9 might be easier to hide for ccw. The M&P9c is a little too large for my wife to sport in the summer, however it is her daily winter carry. Her and I both love the M&P. What a great gun.
     
  5. wow6599

    wow6599 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,417
    Location:
    Wildwood, MO
    M&Pc is double stack, LC9 is single.......
     
  6. soonerboomer

    soonerboomer Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    103
    Location:
    USA
    There is a considerable difference in size and weight between these two. Kinda comparing apples and oranges. The S&W is a fine gun, but most people tend to prefer carrying smaller/lighter.
     
  7. Skylerbone

    Skylerbone Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    3,524
    Location:
    Hawkeye East
    Her proposed carry method might help in determining what will or won't work. That and her size or the size of her purse. You should be able to estimate from there.

    Here's a pic of the M&P 9c next to a Kahr CW9 (similar in size to the Ruger). Note that overall height and length are very close but width (and weight and capacity) are the most obvious differences.

    [​IMG]

    Hope this helps.
     
  8. danez71

    danez71 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    3,793
    Location:
    CAAZ
    I like my MP9c and carry it (IWB) anytime I can carry. Shoots well. Its been flawless.

    However, the LC9 still peaks my interest if I stand the trigger.
     
  9. Doug Add

    Doug Add Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2003
    Messages:
    347
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Thanks for all the helpful replies. Local range has the M&P9c in the rental case, so she will be firing that one soon. Wish they had an LC9 so she could do some side-by-side shooting comparisons.
     
  10. shootingthebreeze

    shootingthebreeze Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    Messages:
    397
    Location:
    East Lansing MI
    Check out the Kahr P380; pricey but nice.
     
  11. snooperman

    snooperman Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    2,143
    Gun Test magazine , latest issue gave LC9 a "C" rating..

    but gave the Kel-Tec PF9 an "A" rating. Their comments were not too good for the Ruger. My advice , do your homework about the issues for these guns. The Kel-Tec PF9 is one fine gun based on my research. I do not have it but those who do seem to be very much contented with it. My wife carries the Taurus 738 TCP 380 and is quite happy with it and the reliability is first rate with Gold Dot ammo.
     
  12. crracer_712

    crracer_712 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2011
    Messages:
    439
    Location:
    Kansas
    Really needs to do her own comparison. the LC9 and M&P9c are totally different in size. I wouldn't put too much stock in to any magazine rating, the article is going to be based off of someone's personal preference, and it isn't going to be yours. A lot of people don't like all the 'safety' gadgets of the LC9. My LC9 is flawless. If a gun has safties, I deal with them, if it doesn't, I deal with it. The LC9 is IMO going to be an easier CC gun. The trigger pull is going to be totally different between the two as well, the M&P breaking much sooner.
     
  13. txhoghunter

    txhoghunter Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2010
    Messages:
    663
    I like the M&P, but you NEED to take her to a range so she can shoot both before you make a final decision
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page