All this Ruger bashing with no firm evidence. Someone posts a few pictures of unclean target holes, calls it "tumbling"? You've got to be kidding me.
Some people play checkers, some people play chess.
Some people sent their firearms to places like clark customs, they do cylinder work on revolver and chamber work on semi-auto's
http://clarkcustomguns.com/
The people that send the revolvers in to have chamber work done on their revolvers typically have 5 chambers worked on for accuracy testing. It doesn't matter if it's a 5-shot/6-shot/7-shot/8-shot/10-shot revolver. Only 5 chambers need to be worked on so they can do 5-shot accuracy tests. It's sorta like the people that take their v-8's in and have 6 cylinders pressure tested. They not only save money because it's quicker to test 6 cylinders than it is to test 8 cylinders. Testing 6 cylinders told them everything they needed to know.
Some people look at pictures and see holes. For some odd reason I looked at a picture to op posted and saw egged shaped holes. Others saw holes made from rn/fn jacketed bullets.
Posters thought it was unfair of me to post pics of holes left in the paper from wc's. Myself I like using wc's because the holes they leave are easier to read when it pertains to bullet stability.
I got an idear, I'll post some holes in paper of bullets that are either rn of fn bullets that have no shoulders. From what I'm reading factory rn/fn's should leave ugly bullet holes that are out of round, smear marks in the same position in the hole and tear the paper instead of cutting it.
Some people play checkers, some people play chess.
Some people buy jacketed bullets, some people make their own jacketed bullets.
Some people test what the factory gives them for jacketed bullets, some people make their own jacketed bullets testing bullet diameter/core alloy/bonded vs pressed cores, hp shapes, hp depths, hp pleats, length of the hp notches, etc.
Typically the people that buy their bullets tend to see holes in the paper. The only time they get concerned is when the bullets hit sideways.
Typically the people that make their own bullets tend to take a look at the shapes of the holes the bullets left in the paper.
People that buy their bullets look at these
People that make their own bullets take to take a closer look. A 6r rn bullet and the bullet holes they make.
Odd, a rn bullet, actually a very long rn (6r) that cuts a clean hole???
People that buy their bullets tend to look at the groups on a target. People that make their own bullets not only look at the groups, they look at the holes the bullets left in the paper.
More holes in paper.
Those were holes left from these bullets.
Odd, no wc/swc they are nothing more than a fn bullet that is home made using nothing more than a 380acp case for a jacket and a 32cal hbwc for a core.
Or how about these bullets, they are not a wc or a swc by any means.
Those bullets cut these holes
How about some pointy jacketed bullets that were home made for the 45acp
Odd, more round holes in the paper.
Some people play checkers some people play chess.
Some people buy bullets some people have made enough of there own to see what the different affects from the bullets diameter/core/construction look like on paper
The people that don't know tend to say there's nothing wrong and only see holes and groups.
The people that do know tend to point out they see something they shouldn't be seeing.
Who's write/wrong??
The guy that says nothings wrong or the guy that says you might want to look at this.
Well, the firearm isn't getting sent back because of " no firm evidence".
Some people play checkers some people play chess.
Some people can't read a target, other can.
Some can not see a problem others can not.
Which do you think stands a better chance of seeing something wrong on a target.?
A guy that buys his own bullets for 30 years.
A guy that had made his own bullets for 30 years.
