S&W 99 vs Glock 22

[Apocalypse-Now]

^^that's not proof of a 1911, or any other gun that's had 328,000 rounds through it.


another thing you failed to mention, all of tod greene's gen4 issues were resolved with a simple extractor change, which i had to do on my gen4 & gen3 as well. it's been well documented that glock's been putting out bad extractors for a while now, but it's only a $10 part, and an easy fix.


fail.

 

[jon_in_wv]

Neither have you proven a Glock had that either, FAIL. Nor have you proven a P99 or other pistol in that exact same test couldn't do the exact same thing. Double fail.

I'll give you one more chance.

 

[Apocalypse-Now]

Neither have you proven a Glock had that either, FAIL.

orly?


here ya go! (as documented by hirtenberger and on display at the glock factory) :




you all done now with your baseless argument? LMAO

 

[Apocalypse-Now]

 

[jon_in_wv]

No, my original argument was and still is, though you choose to ignore it, whether a Glock did whatever the hype of the day claims does NOTHING to prove whether or not any other weapon is capable of the same thing. Glock torture tests are not done head to head for a reason. Glock says, "our gun was frozen and still fired" or "it fired underwater" or "it fired after being in the snow" and the people who don't know better ASSUME no other gun can do the same. I provided links where a Glock was subjected to the same test its competitors were subjected to and fared NO BETTER. To you it makes my claims baseless because I don't ASSUME the results you do. So be it.

 

[jon_in_wv]

:banghead::banghead::banghead:

See, emoticons didn't make me any more or less correct either.