WardenWolf
member
The rail I've got centers the scope on the gun. Well mostly centers. It's actually off to the right by a couple millimeters. Not enough to bother right-handed shooters, but making it even more convenient for lefties. It's a top quality mount.
It is not inherently illegal to use a high-capacity magazine in a foreign gun, but you are required to have reduced the foreign parts count to 10 or fewer to comply with 922(r). The wording, however, says "Particularly suited or readily adaptable for sporting purposes." The ATF has also stated that it is NOT illegal to merely possess parts that, if mounted, could make your firearm non-922(r)-compliant. This is directly opposite to what they say about everything else, such as parts that, if installed, could make a firearm fully automatic, where mere possession is a felony. With the 10-round mag in your immediate possession, it would be hard to say it is not "adaptable". People who have had discussions with ATF agents have also confirmed that it is largely a tack-on charge that is added once they already have possession of your firearm for another reason, which makes sense given that they would require a warrant to seize and search your weapon. Long story short: they are not out trying to take away guns from people who are using a particular mag for target shooting purposes, and unless the high-cap mag is installed on the firearm when it is seized, it doesn't count.
That is NOT to say this will not change under the new administration, and in fact I would not be surprised if it does. In that case, I will not be using that magazine until I have replaced the 2 parts needed to bring my gun into permanent compliance. Not like I even used it at all last time I took it out. It doesn't work with my benchrest.
It is not inherently illegal to use a high-capacity magazine in a foreign gun, but you are required to have reduced the foreign parts count to 10 or fewer to comply with 922(r). The wording, however, says "Particularly suited or readily adaptable for sporting purposes." The ATF has also stated that it is NOT illegal to merely possess parts that, if mounted, could make your firearm non-922(r)-compliant. This is directly opposite to what they say about everything else, such as parts that, if installed, could make a firearm fully automatic, where mere possession is a felony. With the 10-round mag in your immediate possession, it would be hard to say it is not "adaptable". People who have had discussions with ATF agents have also confirmed that it is largely a tack-on charge that is added once they already have possession of your firearm for another reason, which makes sense given that they would require a warrant to seize and search your weapon. Long story short: they are not out trying to take away guns from people who are using a particular mag for target shooting purposes, and unless the high-cap mag is installed on the firearm when it is seized, it doesn't count.
That is NOT to say this will not change under the new administration, and in fact I would not be surprised if it does. In that case, I will not be using that magazine until I have replaced the 2 parts needed to bring my gun into permanent compliance. Not like I even used it at all last time I took it out. It doesn't work with my benchrest.
Last edited: