Since beginning this search, I have spent a fair amount of time at several gun stores handling various subcompact 9mm automatics. They were:
-Beretta Px4 Storm
-CZ 2075 RAMI BD
-Glock 26 Gen 4
-H&K P2000SK LEM
-SIG P224
-SIG P250
-Springfield XD.
Some thoughts on each:
Beretta Px4 Storm: I almost didn't look at this one because it looks like a hair dryer. I know, I know, looks aren't everything, and there are some truly ugly guns in that list, but the appearance of the Beretta is really off-putting. Nevertheless, at 13+1 capacity it merited a look. The manual of arms is virtually the same as the Beretta 92 series and the trigger was reminiscent of it as well. I'm a big fan of my M9 so this is a good thing. The safety/decocker on the Storm is shorter and harder to manipulate than on the M9 though. Overall, I feel as though I should like this gun more than I do...but I just couldn't get past the looks. Paint it pink and slap a Revlon sticker on it and you'd never even know it was a gun.
CZ 2075 RAMI BD: I have been trying to like this gun for years. I like almost everything about it. It's got what I consider to be the best trigger in its class, in both DA and SA modes. The grip is OK, although I wish it felt more like my CZ 75B. But I've never seen a carry pistol in more desperate need of a melt job than the RAMI. Sharp edges everywhere. And because of that, I've never been able to bring myself to buy one.
Glock 26 Gen 4: I am a long-time Glock skeptic. I've never owned a striker-fired pistol, never liked the idea of a trigger that light without a manual safety. I still don't, and that's the only thing keeping me from buying this gun. With the Gen 4, Glock has made the ergonomics work for me. The finger grooves don't pinch me any more and my hands fall naturally to the controls. The grip angle is much better than it ever was before. I like this gun, I really do, and I almost brought one home today. I may yet. But that light trigger...any gun can bite you. Glocks will bite you faster than most. If the design doesn't quite live up to the Perfection motto, it certainly demands it in gun handling.
H&K P2000SK LEM: This is the gun I wanted to like and in the end regretted that I didn't. I have a couple of USPs that have really grown on me, so I had the idea that I could standardize on the H&K manual of arms for carry guns - P2000SK in summer, USP in winter. Unfortunately the little gun didn't hold up its end of the bargain. The grip was a little awkward and the magazine release is far too small. The price tag is a little high too but you have to pay to play with an H&K. The LEM trigger, about which I've read so many good things, didn't impress - long and indefinite. I'd rather have the standard H&K DA/SA trigger, which isn't exactly an award-winner but at least I'm used to it. Roll on the VP9 and VP9SK - if I can get my head around carrying a striker-fired gun.
SIG P224: A shrunken version of the classic P-series SIGs, the P224 was easy to reject, mostly because of a spotty reliability record to date and those truly awful E2 grips. I've felt sandpaper that was more pleasant. Throw in an astronomical price tag and it never had a chance.
SIG P250: This gun has a DAO trigger that just won't break and a frame that feels like it will. The joke about GM in the bad old days ran, "Body by Fisher, interior by Fisher-Price" - and that could just as easily apply to SIG's polymer frames.
Springfield XD: I like the XD family conceptually. Combining a striker-fired trigger with a grip safety is genius - you get all the advantages of that trigger system with a layer of safety that no other striker-fired pistol offers. However, I've never liked the way they feel in my hand, top-heavy with unpleasant recoil characteristics.
At the end of all this, there's no clear choice, I still don't have a new carry gun, and I don't quite know what to do next. If I'm going to buy one of these guns, I'm going to have to compromise...and I don't know what compromise to make.