Bill2e
Member
More kids drown in pools each year than are killed by guns, but hey this article was not looking for fact or intellegent comment.
Sexually insecure Dirty Harrys...
- Thread starter TT
- Start date
- Status
JERRY
Member
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2003
- Messages
- 3,847
liberals are like anyone else who wears a skirt.....when something goes bump in the night they like the fact that you have a gun and can use it if need be, but when you break up with them they try to hurt your ego by attacking your manhood....you'd expect that from a woman, but i guess on the liberal side its hard to tell the different between the two without seeing how they pee first.
That's funny , less than 25 % of hunters here bag a deer every year . If there is no "skill" involved , wouldn't everyone get their deer?This guy is probably a PETA member to .
I always find this idea interesting . Rather than look at the reason for suicides for prevention , these people look at the implement used . isn't the REAL issue , why are so many people suicidal ?
I challenge this writer to head out to NYC , Cali, Chicago etc and "get a license "
Well , the SC didn't make up something new . They simply recognized what was already there . They are not "now" saying it's an individual right since they never said it wasn't . They also don't say you have the right to kill , but instead , a right to defense . Big difference . A perp wants to "kill" , you want to "defend" against that act .
Maybe practice what you preach ?
This is what I find funny . He admits people will kill people with all manner of "weapons" but keeps vilifying the gun rather than the wielder of any of the weapons . He almost has a "so what' attitude that people get killed by other means .
Sistema1927
Member
I must be nuttier than the nuttiest.
I will go on the record, here and now, stating that more guns causes less death and destruction.
Standing Wolf
Member in memoriam
Satire. I'm sure it's satire.
I remember reading this same old crapola back in the 90's and before. It was all over the place including the internet boards and chats from the late 1990's and on.
I always laugh when they come up with the 'sexual' comments. It seems to me, since I am a female, an older lady - soon to be 58 years old, that the idiots who make those comments about an extension of a man's anatomy obviously never MET, KNEW or SHOT with many female 'shooters', plinkers, hunters or ladies who were INTO self defense big time!
Since I am who I say I am, I have never hidden the fact that I am an older woman or hidden my age as some young 'chick' when I went on 'boards/chats', come up with some name that may call confusion, use my real name and/or my nick name, I do KNOW several people on this board from way, way back when and newer people... they know that I am a woman. I have met some here and elsewhere in person, shot with several of you, socialized with several of you, spoke on the telephone with several of you, emailed some, campaigned with some in gun and political issues, etc.
So what do 'THEY' say to a real lady, young or old, single, married, widowed, remarried, etc. who does like to shoot ALL kinds of firearms INCLUDING Dirty Harry guns using 44Special and 44Magnum, 45Colts aka long colt, 22LR, 9mm, 357Magnum, 38Specials, etc.?
Been there - done that talking and writing to some of these 'winners' and whiners aka clueLESS people.
I am not confused about my 'identity'. I am not insecure in my married life nor was I in my widowhood, my views, my previous work, I am retired now, my politics, my faith, my ups, my downs, my achievements, my failures, my shooting ability in self defense and/or in my own firearms that I have previously owned and/or shot up to my present firearms.
Catherine - Real Name
Montana - Real Place
Armed and Female
I always laugh when they come up with the 'sexual' comments. It seems to me, since I am a female, an older lady - soon to be 58 years old, that the idiots who make those comments about an extension of a man's anatomy obviously never MET, KNEW or SHOT with many female 'shooters', plinkers, hunters or ladies who were INTO self defense big time!
Since I am who I say I am, I have never hidden the fact that I am an older woman or hidden my age as some young 'chick' when I went on 'boards/chats', come up with some name that may call confusion, use my real name and/or my nick name, I do KNOW several people on this board from way, way back when and newer people... they know that I am a woman. I have met some here and elsewhere in person, shot with several of you, socialized with several of you, spoke on the telephone with several of you, emailed some, campaigned with some in gun and political issues, etc.
So what do 'THEY' say to a real lady, young or old, single, married, widowed, remarried, etc. who does like to shoot ALL kinds of firearms INCLUDING Dirty Harry guns using 44Special and 44Magnum, 45Colts aka long colt, 22LR, 9mm, 357Magnum, 38Specials, etc.?
Been there - done that talking and writing to some of these 'winners' and whiners aka clueLESS people.
I am not confused about my 'identity'. I am not insecure in my married life nor was I in my widowhood, my views, my previous work, I am retired now, my politics, my faith, my ups, my downs, my achievements, my failures, my shooting ability in self defense and/or in my own firearms that I have previously owned and/or shot up to my present firearms.
Catherine - Real Name
Montana - Real Place
Armed and Female
MD_Willington
Member
Hey you guys own grenades and machine guns !!
Hot dog, whens the fun start!
Sexually insecure... hmm, well I don't know about that, I'm not the one running around with my "gun" hanging out, I also don't have to recruit people for my .gov affiliation to get laid or perform strange rituals...
"Satanic Ritual Sex Crime Leads to Arrest of North Carolina Democratic Activist (Video)"
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2039322/posts
"Another Democrat chief arrested in satanic torture
Victims allegedly shackled to beds, raped, locked in cages without food"
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/?pageId=68601
Hey maybe that's why we are armed, to protect ourselves and our families from the same people that are into to all kinds of weird crazy stuff.
Hot dog, whens the fun start!
Sexually insecure... hmm, well I don't know about that, I'm not the one running around with my "gun" hanging out, I also don't have to recruit people for my .gov affiliation to get laid or perform strange rituals...
"Satanic Ritual Sex Crime Leads to Arrest of North Carolina Democratic Activist (Video)"
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2039322/posts
"Another Democrat chief arrested in satanic torture
Victims allegedly shackled to beds, raped, locked in cages without food"
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/?pageId=68601
Hey maybe that's why we are armed, to protect ourselves and our families from the same people that are into to all kinds of weird crazy stuff.
Ah, but as I noted in another thread - value, meaning, and purpose are entirely arbitrary and thus specific to the individual making those assessments (including the inventor/maker/etc.) and irrelevant to all others.
In strictly objective terms, a gun's actual function is to propel a projectile in a particular direction at high velocity. Whether this function is used for killing or otherwise is left to the discretion of the user.
RobMoore
Member
I can't believe someone actual gives this sorry excuse for a writer a paycheck. That was a poorly written article, and I say so with as much objectivity as I can muster (which is a dump truck more than this writer obviously has).
Quote by Jerry:
liberals are like anyone else who wears a skirt.....when something goes bump in the night they like the fact that you have a gun and can use it if need be, but when you break up with them they try to hurt your ego by attacking your manhood....you'd expect that from a woman, but i guess on the liberal side its hard to tell the different between the two without seeing how they pee first.
~~~~~
NO offense but I disagree with you on this in some matters.
Liberals, conservatives, neo con artists, anti gunners, fill in the blank political party are NOT always like anything who wears a 'skirt'. They are ALL different. ANTI GUNNERS come in all political parties and that is a fact including RINOS and fill in the blanks. ANTI GUNNERS and PRO GUNNERS come in males, females and ones who might be some other 'orientation' for lack of a better word.
This lady, Catherine = real name, who does wear skirts among other clothes is one lady that does NOT always need a man when something goes 'bump in the night' or in other self defense cases. Some of us have had things happen when our late husband was overseas, alone - single, married or widowhood, no Daddy, no brother or "Man with a Gun" around. We were very prepared/capable with our skills even if they were only the basic ones at the time on how to use and operate a gun in a self defense situation or issue. That included doing the other steps when it came to a potential home invasion or anything else. That included having the German Shepherd, the house layout, security items working and calling the operator because there was NO 911 at the time.
NOT all females or males live in areas where they can defend themselves OUTSIDE of the home with a 'gun' or they lived in states where previously there was NO CCW or open carry or even allowed to have a loaded gun in your vehicle!
Don't lump liberals and for that matter neo con artists in with those who wear 'skirts' aka females.
I would not know about the other comments on break ups (Girl friend-boy friend.) since I have not had to deal with that. NO offense.
Bump in the night? I can handle it WITH and without a 'man' by my side. I admit that I would Prefer a well trained man and/or woman to deal with that or by my side in a self defense issue along with the nice German Shepherd.
Take care and thanks for understanding.
Catherine - I am not a liberal and I am not a neo con artist. I am a conservative/libertarian in MOST issues and foremost a Constitution First - America First Lady! I loathed Bill as much as I loathe Bush and his ILK - the NWO Dems and the NWO Reps - UGH. I am VERY pro gun and into self defense! I knew what the SECOND meant and I did not have to have it explained to ME by the black robed judges. I know that IT defends the others especially the ones that have been ignored and shredded!
liberals are like anyone else who wears a skirt.....when something goes bump in the night they like the fact that you have a gun and can use it if need be, but when you break up with them they try to hurt your ego by attacking your manhood....you'd expect that from a woman, but i guess on the liberal side its hard to tell the different between the two without seeing how they pee first.
~~~~~
NO offense but I disagree with you on this in some matters.
Liberals, conservatives, neo con artists, anti gunners, fill in the blank political party are NOT always like anything who wears a 'skirt'. They are ALL different. ANTI GUNNERS come in all political parties and that is a fact including RINOS and fill in the blanks. ANTI GUNNERS and PRO GUNNERS come in males, females and ones who might be some other 'orientation' for lack of a better word.
This lady, Catherine = real name, who does wear skirts among other clothes is one lady that does NOT always need a man when something goes 'bump in the night' or in other self defense cases. Some of us have had things happen when our late husband was overseas, alone - single, married or widowhood, no Daddy, no brother or "Man with a Gun" around. We were very prepared/capable with our skills even if they were only the basic ones at the time on how to use and operate a gun in a self defense situation or issue. That included doing the other steps when it came to a potential home invasion or anything else. That included having the German Shepherd, the house layout, security items working and calling the operator because there was NO 911 at the time.
NOT all females or males live in areas where they can defend themselves OUTSIDE of the home with a 'gun' or they lived in states where previously there was NO CCW or open carry or even allowed to have a loaded gun in your vehicle!
Don't lump liberals and for that matter neo con artists in with those who wear 'skirts' aka females.
I would not know about the other comments on break ups (Girl friend-boy friend.) since I have not had to deal with that. NO offense.
Bump in the night? I can handle it WITH and without a 'man' by my side. I admit that I would Prefer a well trained man and/or woman to deal with that or by my side in a self defense issue along with the nice German Shepherd.
Take care and thanks for understanding.
Catherine - I am not a liberal and I am not a neo con artist. I am a conservative/libertarian in MOST issues and foremost a Constitution First - America First Lady! I loathed Bill as much as I loathe Bush and his ILK - the NWO Dems and the NWO Reps - UGH. I am VERY pro gun and into self defense! I knew what the SECOND meant and I did not have to have it explained to ME by the black robed judges. I know that IT defends the others especially the ones that have been ignored and shredded!
Last edited:
xjchief
Member
LMAO that guy is a complete moron.
Deanimator
Member
The intellectual equivalent of "Hustler Letters"...
cracked butt
Member
I googled Philip Slater and read some of his blogs. Methinks he consumed too many pharmacological substances earlier in his life.
The guy is a croissant eating, belly button gazer
Philip Slater has an A.B. and Ph. D. from Harvard and taught sociology at Harvard, Brandeis, and UCSC. He was Professor and Chairperson of the Brandeis Sociology Department in 1971 when he resigned to found--with Jacqueline Doyle and Morrie Schwartz-- Greenhouse, a non-profit growth center, where he led encounter groups and personal growth workshops. He has been a merchant seaman, actor, business consultant, cookie salesman, marriage officiant, and president of a theatre. He co-wrote and narrated PARADOX ON 72nd STREET, a one-hour TV documentary aired nationally by PBS, and has acted in over 30 plays and films
Philip Slater has an A.B. and Ph. D. from Harvard and taught sociology at Harvard, Brandeis, and UCSC. He was Professor and Chairperson of the Brandeis Sociology Department in 1971 when he resigned to found--with Jacqueline Doyle and Morrie Schwartz-- Greenhouse, a non-profit growth center, where he led encounter groups and personal growth workshops. He has been a merchant seaman, actor, business consultant, cookie salesman, marriage officiant, and president of a theatre. He co-wrote and narrated PARADOX ON 72nd STREET, a one-hour TV documentary aired nationally by PBS, and has acted in over 30 plays and films
mnw42
Member
I do. I could. I don't. I won't
I'm offended by ignorance - the unwillingness to learn.
I'm offended by ignorance - the unwillingness to learn.
Millions of guns in the US and less than .01% are used any given year. Yep, they sure are made for killin.
DEDON45
Member
All I want to know is, is where are my grenades and full auto weapons... been a member of the NRA for a long time... and haven't received mine yet! I do have the goofy blue hat though!
That article, what a joke!
That article, what a joke!
I love it when they go on about 'hunting' and guns. NOT!
I would give a list but you know the 'drill'.
They would rather eat a piece of meat wrapped in plastic and stuck/grown in some cage in many cases than eat OPEN range meat - that is IF they even eat meat or fish or whatever!
I know some vegans who are NOT nasty like others (PETA types!) that go on about eating/killing animals for FOOD.
MOST hunters are one shot - one kill people as my husband is. (My late husband did not hunt but was into self defense and the RKBA issue.) Anyway... you should have heard the conversation when it came to meat eating people who ripped up my Montana husband about his 'hunting'. They were absolutely clueless! UGH. They make me sick! Literally sick and angry so most of the time - I do NOT waste my breath on them since they can't even understand THINGS about buffalo, mountain sheep, goats, moose, elk, deer, grouse, fish, open range cattle, etc.!!!
My husband and the hunters that I KNOW WELL do not hunt for 'sport'. They hunt for good meat and food for their dinner table! For their loved ones and for some other people too.
My husband is an outstanding hunter and I am NOT bs-ing you. He is usually a one shot - one kill man. A ethical hunter and a true conservationist in ALL WAYS. I know I am bragging but I am VERY proud of him, his hunted food, his generous attitude and him being an old fashioned CONSERVATIONIST when it comes to the the preservation of animals and the great outdoors!
MOST hunters and fishermen along with good/ethical 'cattlemen' know more in one hand about conservation than hundreds of Peta types! The Peta types would rather have dying by starvation, diseased, stressed out, etc. elk, deer, moose, etc. herds!
Catherine
I would give a list but you know the 'drill'.
They would rather eat a piece of meat wrapped in plastic and stuck/grown in some cage in many cases than eat OPEN range meat - that is IF they even eat meat or fish or whatever!
I know some vegans who are NOT nasty like others (PETA types!) that go on about eating/killing animals for FOOD.
MOST hunters are one shot - one kill people as my husband is. (My late husband did not hunt but was into self defense and the RKBA issue.) Anyway... you should have heard the conversation when it came to meat eating people who ripped up my Montana husband about his 'hunting'. They were absolutely clueless! UGH. They make me sick! Literally sick and angry so most of the time - I do NOT waste my breath on them since they can't even understand THINGS about buffalo, mountain sheep, goats, moose, elk, deer, grouse, fish, open range cattle, etc.!!!
My husband and the hunters that I KNOW WELL do not hunt for 'sport'. They hunt for good meat and food for their dinner table! For their loved ones and for some other people too.
My husband is an outstanding hunter and I am NOT bs-ing you. He is usually a one shot - one kill man. A ethical hunter and a true conservationist in ALL WAYS. I know I am bragging but I am VERY proud of him, his hunted food, his generous attitude and him being an old fashioned CONSERVATIONIST when it comes to the the preservation of animals and the great outdoors!
MOST hunters and fishermen along with good/ethical 'cattlemen' know more in one hand about conservation than hundreds of Peta types! The Peta types would rather have dying by starvation, diseased, stressed out, etc. elk, deer, moose, etc. herds!
Catherine
Last edited:
Wow, guns are the most efficient way to kill people?
I guess word hasn't gotten around to the Department of Defense yet. Guess all those bombs and missiles are second-string now.
[sarcasm]Someone should have told the 19terrorists that a handgun would be much more effective than hijacking airplanes, loaded up with jet fuel, and flying them into buildings. They'd only each have had to kill ~3000/20 (there were originally supposed to be 20 hijackers on 9/11) = 150 people. That's nothing, considering how easy a handgun makes it to kill. They should have at least tried to use handguns, instead of boxcutters, to hijack the planes, if they were REAL MEN. They must have had large schwanstuckers if they could get by without guns and use measely box cutters instead. They must not have been worried about their own manliness. They put Dirty Harry to shame. [/sarcasm]
I guess word hasn't gotten around to the Department of Defense yet. Guess all those bombs and missiles are second-string now.
[sarcasm]Someone should have told the 19terrorists that a handgun would be much more effective than hijacking airplanes, loaded up with jet fuel, and flying them into buildings. They'd only each have had to kill ~3000/20 (there were originally supposed to be 20 hijackers on 9/11) = 150 people. That's nothing, considering how easy a handgun makes it to kill. They should have at least tried to use handguns, instead of boxcutters, to hijack the planes, if they were REAL MEN. They must have had large schwanstuckers if they could get by without guns and use measely box cutters instead. They must not have been worried about their own manliness. They put Dirty Harry to shame. [/sarcasm]
Doggy Daddy
Member
Ya know if I was going to "compensate", I don't think it would be with a 2 inch snubby.
tuckerdog1
Member
Yep, as I said in my earlier post-TOOL
Tuckerdog1
You know, I think in general, people who cast aspersions about people's sexual insecurity, and how men "compensate" for a small unit with guns, cars etc., are the ones who are the most insecure about their gender role, and masculinity/femininity as the case may be.
- Status