larryh1108
Member
Many times logic and physics don't match up very well.
Talking in general terms for powder burn rates, it seems to make sense to use a fast powder for the short barrel (under 3" barrels) semis to get as much powder as possible burning in the shortest time.
Today there are a lot of snubbies and pocket pistols with short barrels. I know there are other things to consider due to pressure spikes, etc. However, is the theory that the shorter barrels need the fastest burning powders to do the best job or does physics say otherwise?
I like and use Bullseye for many reasons. Is this the best for the pocket pistols like the LCP, Solo, PM9 and snubbies?
Talking in general terms for powder burn rates, it seems to make sense to use a fast powder for the short barrel (under 3" barrels) semis to get as much powder as possible burning in the shortest time.
Today there are a lot of snubbies and pocket pistols with short barrels. I know there are other things to consider due to pressure spikes, etc. However, is the theory that the shorter barrels need the fastest burning powders to do the best job or does physics say otherwise?
I like and use Bullseye for many reasons. Is this the best for the pocket pistols like the LCP, Solo, PM9 and snubbies?