Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Sighting in a rifle

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Phaethon, Nov 12, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Phaethon

    Phaethon Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008
    Messages:
    284
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    I've heard around of people not wanting to use sandbags to sight in their rifles, because it zonks up the barrel harmonics or something of that nature. To me sandbags seem like the most stable shooting platform on a bench, so how exactly should one sight in their newly bought or scope'd rifles?

    Besides, are barrel harmonics still affected when a full length stock is involved, or when the barrel isn't free floating to begin with?
     
  2. USSR

    USSR Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    8,452
    Location:
    Finger Lakes Region of NY
    The only way a sandbag is going to mess with barrel harmonics, is if you rest the barrel on it, which is a no-no to begin with.

    Don
     
  3. Furious_George

    Furious_George Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    12
    I'd say as long as you're not resting the barrel of your rifle on the sand bag (which I've seen many people do), it shouldn't have any affect on your barrel harmonics...especially if your barrel is free floating.
     
  4. Furious_George

    Furious_George Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    12
    ^ i was beat to it...
     
  5. daorhgih

    daorhgih member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2008
    Messages:
    608
    Zero-ing in with a scope.

    What I've heard, and seen, is to sight for a perfect bulls-eye, squeeze, note the actual spot hit, adjust the cross-hairs for that point, and squeeze again. Should be exactly on, for your distance. Is this wrong? Thanks.
     
  6. Furncliff

    Furncliff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2005
    Messages:
    2,216
    Location:
    Western Slope of Colorado
  7. Bill_Rights

    Bill_Rights Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    679
    Location:
    Annandale, Virginia USA
    Not rest on sand bag? You gotta be kiddding...!?

    REF "Furious George" and "USSR": FG said
    and USSR said "
    ".

    Whoa! What the hell is going on here? The whole point of a sand-bag rest is to damp out and remove our natural human jitter and variability, so we can see what the gun itself is doing.

    Are you saying that, if we use sand-bag rest, it should contact the fore-stock, not the barrel? That I can accept.

    Why not clearly state what you mean, hmmm?
     
  8. flank

    flank Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2010
    Messages:
    17
    yes I think they were saying DON'T rest your barrel on the sandbags. so yes you put the front portion of your stock on the sandbags.
     
  9. LoonWulf

    LoonWulf Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2010
    Messages:
    3,250
    Location:
    Hawaii
    LOL, I use sandbags to sight in. I also usually shoot a group with the rifle slung up and in my hand sitting atop the front bag and my arms resting on the table to make sure it dosent shoot somewhere else entirely afterwards.
     
  10. justgoto

    justgoto member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2009
    Messages:
    86
    The only way the sandbag could "zonks up the barrel harmonics" is if they are "resting the barrel of your rifle on the sand bag".

    They are answering the question directly and correctly.
     
  11. 22-rimfire

    22-rimfire Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    11,380
    Location:
    TN
    I use sand bags. Just don't rest the barrel on the bag. That goes for any rest and any firearm.
     
  12. teetertotter

    teetertotter Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    204
    Location:
    Janesville, WI
    Sandbags if you want to have real accuracy, from the one's in the know, I know.
     
  13. Art Eatman

    Art Eatman Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    43,267
    Location:
    Terlingua, TX; Thomasville,GA
    As far as group size, ensure uniformity in having the front sandbag under the same point of the forearm for each shot. I put it at the same place as I hold my hand when in the field.

    For sighting in with a bolt action, I first good-eye boresight. Then, one shot at a time at 25 yards until I'm adjusted as close to dead-on as makes no nevermind. That's usually three or four shots. Then, I go to 100 yards for three-shot groups. I move the group-center as necessary to (usually) be around two inches high. Set it and forget it, for every hunting rifle I've ever used, these last sixty years. I always recheck sight-in from time to time, on general principles, but I've never had any significant change over maybe 1/4 to 1/2 inch at a hundred yards.
     
  14. oldfool

    oldfool Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2009
    Messages:
    2,026
    Location:
    Thomasville, Georgia
    yep, what the man (Art) said
    eyeball boresight 1st, fire one round, then zero in at short range, always aim at the target X, that's why they put an X on the target

    if you know (or can pretty good guess) your sight adjustments, can get close enough for tweaking within next 3 rounds, dead on in five or six, then move target on out there

    forget that business about re-zero to 1st shot POI for 2nd round fired.. unless your have your gun clamped in a custom vise rest, you just wasted a round
    (worse yet if you start chasing yet more holes in paper)

    (dunno why folks seem confused about the difference between a barrel and a forestock, but if you can group sub MOA offhand at 100 yards unrested, shucks, just do it your way.. and color me envious)
     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2010
  15. Uncle Mike

    Uncle Mike Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Messages:
    3,129
    Location:
    never never land...never land here!
    If you cover the entire rifle with the sand while shooting it...you'll get pretty good groups!

    The barrel should not touch....anything, nothing, nadda, zip. Just the forearm Only.
     
  16. HKGuns

    HKGuns Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2004
    Messages:
    2,396
    Location:
    Bora Bora
    Art and I use the exact same process, works every time.
     
  17. teetertotter

    teetertotter Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    204
    Location:
    Janesville, WI
    Art, how come the bench rest folks do just the opposite?
     
  18. Art Eatman

    Art Eatman Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    43,267
    Location:
    Terlingua, TX; Thomasville,GA
    Opposite? In what way?

    Realize I'm not claiming that my way is the only way. It's just what I've done for eons, and I'm mostly a hunter, not a target shooter.
     
  19. dmazur

    dmazur Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,263
    Location:
    Pacific NW
    Benchrest technique -

    http://blog.sinclairintl.com/2009/01/15/shooting-non-benchrest-rifles-from-the-bench/

    While most of the discussion is about shooting non-benchrest rifles, there is one paragraph that describes benchrest rifles -

    Benchrest type rifles will usually weigh over 10 lbs and have wide, flat forends. Our definition of a benchrest rifle for discussion purposes would include any barreled action in a benchrest stock, hunter class rifles, and some varmint rifles. Competitive 100-yard and 200-yard benchrest rifles can have a maximum forend width of 3” and the bottom can be flat or convex. The bottom of the forend cannot be concave. This prevents stock makers from designing a stock with edge rails.

    As far as I can tell, they are heavier and have forends designed to "ride a bag" in a straight line. As straight as possible without building a rail system. Other than that, I don't see a whole lot of difference.

    The barrel still isn't supported.
     
  20. teetertotter

    teetertotter Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    204
    Location:
    Janesville, WI
    I see BR folks rest their stock in the rear and pretty far forward on the front stock whether light or heavy weight, meaning 6-1/2 lb or 10+lb classes.

    Art is saying he positions his front sandbag closest to his off hand hold or possible balance point which might be closest to the trigger, when sighting in. BR guys front rest is pretty far forward on the stock when sighting in or during competition. Perhaps too, if Art is right handed, he maybe holding with out stretched left arm and not close in next to his body like most off hand shooters.

    Which will give the most accuracy in sighting in off sandbags for hunters, front sandbag close to trigger area or sandbag positioned far forward on the stock? Would both prove the same in accuracy? Any thoughts? Make any difference where front sandbag is positioned on front stock[not on barrel]?

    Since BR guys front rest is way forward on the stock, I am inclined to do the same with the sandbag when sighting my .22LR. Who know's? Just my thoughts, if mean anything.
     
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2012
  21. bhk

    bhk Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2006
    Messages:
    1,042
    Location:
    Wooded acreage in rural midwest
    I think it depends whether we are talking about trying to shoot small groups or trying to get a hunting zero. When I do intitial sight-ins and load testing on a hunting rifle, I use generally accepted bench techniques. When finalizing my hunting/field zero, I place my hand between the sandbag and the stock, don't use a rear bag, and try to hold the rifle with the same pressures I would use in the field. The point of impact often does change a little when held that way.
     
  22. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    46,727
    Location:
    Alabama
    Exactly how I do it. I bore sight, as I suspect Art does (good-eye), the old fashioned way, take out the bolt and look down the barrel. Start at 25, move to 100. And yes, rest the stock on the bags, rests, whatever, not the barrel.

    Yes, in Benchrest we had the front rest up toward the front end of the stock. A longer radius is steadier with a stiff stock and action.

    This may not prove true with a thin wood stock hunting rifle. ;)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page