Jrob24
Member
I was looking at sks accessories online and saw something of interest. Does anyone here use a recoil buffer and is it worth buying?
Enjoy it, might be your last meal if your counting on that buffer equipped AK.It was only $9. Geez, I spend more than that on a good steak.
How many of these came equipped from the factory with a buffer? Seems if it was necessary, good ole Mikail would have spec'd them.KALASHNIKOV----Millions and millions of satisfied customers since 1949.
www.kurzzeit.comThey are demonstrating that the bolt doesn't come near the rear contact area
I would think that if there was NO impact, buffer or not, there would be less stress on the gun. The spring absorbs the rearward motion and stress of the bolt as it was designed to. The fact that it NOW hits something that forcefully stops the bolt carrier and transfers that to the gun, it is now impacting the gun. If this was a problem, wouldnt it have been addressed at the factory by the engineers? I never noticed a reduction or softening of impact with the buffer in there. I tend to agree that these things are a solution to a non existant problem(for the most part). If your gun shows wear inside the reciever from contact with the bolt carrier, and it will over time if it does, then you may want to check into it. If it doesnt, why bother? If it serves no purpose whats the point? I agree, if you dont like them dont use them, but if its not really necessary, then it does seem kind of silly to me to put it in there, especially if it can lead to function problems.Besides the added longevity from the energy absorption, the buffers generally make the gun more pleasant to shoot by softening the bolt impact. I have a couple in various firearms, and it isn't hard to tell the difference between shooting with and without the buffer.
If you know of a system that will reliably insure that the bolt doesn't hit the receiver with a wide variety of ammunition and over the normal life of a recoil spring, without being unduly expensive, large, heavy or complex , and without copromising the reliability of the firearm, the patent office is waiting. Keep in mind that the gun must also operate reliably with a reasonably amount of fouling, over a large temperature range and under all climate conditions.I would think that if there was NO impact, buffer or not, there would be less stress on the gun.
It serves two purposes that I mentioned above. These things it Does and does well. If you can live without these two improvements, do it.If it serves no purpose whats the point?
That's like buying a USA magazine for the Mini-14 and saying, "Wow, aftermarket magazines make the Mini-14 unreliable." IIRC, the buffer that came with your gun is a Buffer Technologies piece of crap. Try a Blackjack buffer in the same gun and report back. I had the same experience. I don't think anybody on this board recommends the other brand. Buffertech is the kind of company that finds what they think is a good thing and copies the crap out of it without really testing it or caring about customer complaints. Yankee trader. Beware. Black Jack is a responsive small business that sprung from the need for REAL buffers that the other company was not making. Just because you were burned by another company, don't completely disregard a whole class of firearms accessory.One thing to be aware of with the buffers is, it may cause reliability issues with your rifle. I have an AK SSR-85C that came with a buffer when new. It had cycle and function problems with the buffer installed.
Some of you are WAY off on this one. Look at the design of the AK action. There is a great deal of overtravel where the bolt goes much further than it actually needs to in order to strip the next cartridge. This is done for a simple reason... when the bolt carrier assembly strikes the rear of the receiver, it rebounds with significant force. This speeds up the cyclic rate (irrelevant on a semi-auto) thus increases wear. Yes, AK's do wear, it's just that they're so loose to begin with you won't notice. That extra space allows the bun to function because it gives the gun time to recoil and the magazine time to lift the next round into the path of the bolt carrier.