Stopping the glorification of mass murderers

Status
Not open for further replies.

Wapato

Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2011
Messages
143
Ok, so at first glance this is a "save lives" thing as opposed to a RKBA thing. However I think we all appreciate the link between the frequency of mass murders and the chances of losing 2nd Amendment rights.

This occured to me as they were flashing the mug shots of individuals involved in some of the mass shootings over the past few years during. The perps are often smirking. Further in the news coverage the psycologist they bring forth say outright that the ultimate movtivation for many of these mass shootings is the infamy they expect to recieve. They even may have a desire to "top" the others who they are trying to emulate by having a higher bodycount or by going after even more tragic victims (such as school children) or using scarier weapons ("nasty" black guns).

To that end I believe we should pressure the media and legislation to cease making these people famous. You can cover the incident and shove microphones into the faces of the bereaved if you absolutely must. But there isn't any need to know the killers name, show their picture a thousand times, go over how very hard they had it and how society was mean to them, discuss over their manifestos, or post their crappy poetry.

I think this could significantly improve things without costing people anything.

I know I'm not the first person to think of this. So I'm wondering if any of you know of petitions or organizations for this, or could do some wordsmithing for a new petition or drive.
 
You're right...
But, if it bleeds, it leads.
These same "news" organizations know it fuels the phenomenon. This just gets them more fodder. Both for ratings and to further the ant-gun agenda.
 
What would you suggest instead?

The media act this way because they are profit driven and it's what their audience wants. Nothing more complex than that.
 
Death sells. During the height of both wars, there were always stories of soldiers being killed and the "emotional impact" garbage. Never any story about bagging an HVT, or the new school we built, or all the Afghan kids going to school. Everyone feels the same after some disaster: Blame someone else, sad, etc. 5 stages of acceptance. Give common sense to the media, and you will stop having murder celebrities. Easier said than done.
 
Everybody knows that if it bleeds it leads. And I don't think it would be right to completely stop the story. I'm just talking about them not glorifying the killer and making them famous, which is what they want and what the copycats that will follow will want.

It would be nice if public awareness of the effect of that coverage would prevent them from doing it. However I wouldn't mind if there was some regulations limiting coverage of the killers name and face in a similar way to how F-bombs are penalized. Enough to make networks reluctant to do it, but if somebody thinks its REALLY important than let fly and just suck up the fine if the FCC doesn't agree.

To some degree I'd just encourage members to bring this up at appropriate times, perhaps as something both sides could probably agree on before you go into arming teachers.

Otherwise I was hoping there were some drives out there I didn't know of.

There are some petitions.
http://www.change.org/petitions/media-stop-the-cycle-mass-murderers-don-t-deserve-to-be-famous

http://www.change.org/petitions/stop-sensational-media-coverage-of-mass-killings

http://www.change.org/petitions/res...ndividuals-responsible-for-violent-activities

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/stop-glorifying-mass-murderers/

However they seem a bit weak, and I think those sites might not be so reliable with your personal information.

So I suppose if one was to do a petition the white house petition thing might be a good idea. However that takes a certain level of support. You need 150 digital signatures before the petition becomes visible to searchers, and then 25,000 signatures within 30 days in order to get a response from someone in the administration.

The only reason that seems like it might be effective there is that this seems like it might provide Obama a means of "doing something" that might have relatively wide support.
 
not a new phenomenon

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herostratus

On July 21, 356 BC, seeking notoriety, he burned down the Temple of Artemis at Ephesus in ancient Greece [now Turkey]. The temple was constructed of marble and was built by King Croesus of Lydia to replace an older site destroyed during a flood, and it honoured a local goddess, conflated by the Greeks with Artemis, their goddess of the hunt, the wild, and childbirth. Measuring 130 metres long (426.5 feet) and supported by columns 18 metres high (60 feet), it was one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top