jerkface11
Member
BTW, no deer hunter that I know of would think of shooting a deer with a .223 at 100 yards
Umm why not?
BTW, no deer hunter that I know of would think of shooting a deer with a .223 at 100 yards
And the cans arent?Roller-lock guns are a pain to clean.
Depends. I paid $5-600 for my 91's and sold them for about $2000 each also made a good amount of money on all the extras. Anything HK will bring a premium. No loss there.The money is typically lost on a SALE.
I can believe that. Those stocks on the rifle caliber guns are not fun to shoot. With a standard A2 type fixed stock, they are fine.I shot one that had a collapsible stock on it, i think that turned me off of them.
What planet are you from? I'd love to live in a place where hearing damage isn't a concern for people who use firearms.The can is an expensive novelty with no real practical application in realistic terms.
And the cans arent?
The suppressor will be a pain to get, move, and depending on the range shoot.
Dont need to. I already got every cricket from every John Wayne and cheap cowboy movie ever made chirping in my head 24/7, whats a few more?go fire a couple mags of .223 with no ear protection on
Ever take down a deer before with a .223 at that distance? Try it and let me know how it turns out.