erik said:
I am SO tempted to get a CW9 to replace the 642.
You guys wanna talk me out of it?
OK, I'll give that a shot (so to speak
)
First thing, search in Handguns: Autoloaders and read everything you can on Kahr polymer frame pistols. I did just before I bought my K9 (which I ultimately sold ... long story ...). At the time, I
thought I wanted a P9. After reading a fair number of negative reviews, I opted for the K9. Kahr may have (probably has?) worked out the kinks by now, but if I was in the market for a Kahr polyframe, I'd be reeeeeeaaaallll sure of it.
Having said that, in general, Kahrs are fine guns. If I was going to own a pistol, it'd likely be a Kahr. (I've now migrated to revolvers and will likely stay there for the duration.)
If you like the 7 + 1 rnd capacity better than 5, and the feeling/performance of the CW9 better than the 642, then go for it ... well, that is,
as long as you're willing to do LOTS of training with it, including: 1) how to never limp wrist it (presumably you know that already), and 2) how to un-jam it under pressure (because I'm sure you know that whereas revolvers always go "boom", pistols do - hopefully on rare occasion - jam).
Me? Will I ever get rid of my 642? If I did, it'd only be
to replace it with either a 442, a 637 or a 340.
[Are ya happy DA?
]
But I suspect I'll always have an alloy J snubbie.
Keep us posted on your decision.
Nem