The likelihood of a bear encounter, charge or attack is mainly dependent on how much time a person spends in bear country.Hilarious yet terrifying series of pics. I'm sure he wasn't laughing when that trap went over.
Logic in bear threads? Not going to happen.
I suspect MOST 'bear' threads are about pushing/testing the limits of 'power' in hand held arms, rather than 'how to avoid bears.' Nevermind that most people will never see a bear up close in a defensive situation, it's just one of those 'favorite internet discussions.'
Most folks agree that a handgun is not at all an ideal bear defense, but who wouldn't want at least a .44 magnum in such a situation?
I am hopeful that bear defense will remain only an internet discussion for me and all here on THR, but logically, penetration and shot placement are the factors involved as well as avoidance as noted.
However, most bear attacks take place with the person aware of the bear at 15 meters or less giving almost no real reaction time to most situations. Given that, pepper spray and firearms are not easily deployed in time to be effective for folks that are solo.
Lastly, most bear attack victims have no bear defense whatsoever at the time of their attack. The man in Alaska that killed a juvenile griz in Denali National Park assuredly was better off with his .45 acp than the photographer that only had a camera for protection. Simply being aware of the dangers and types of encounters does indeed enhance avoidance behaviors. Understanding the deficiencies of firearms and pepper spray for bear defense likewise should foster better bear avoidance skills as well. Those are indeed all logical conclusions gleaned from internet bear defense threads.
In addition, bear defense threads are by far the most entertaining firearm threads ever created.