The Vector 53...A Honest Review...

Status
Not open for further replies.

SteyrAUG

Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2003
Messages
563
Now most of us have seen the evaluations by guys like LarryG36 (who coincidentally sells special weapons products) who makes important statements regarding reliability such as "These things are great!" and "These are gonna sell like hotcakes", etc.

Well in my opinion the ones posted online looked terrible. They looked every bit like the special weapons guns I was accustomed to seeing and that is no surprise since special weapons built the first 250 guns for vector.

Vector was subsequently very dissatisfied with the guns and even more displeased with customer response to them. As a result Vector rebuilt most of the original 250 guns and decided after those were sold, they would do the assembly. For verification of the above facts please call Vector at (801) 295-1917.

Having seen the Vector UZIs and being very impressed with qaulity, build and performance I had very high hopes that the Vector built V53s would be a quality reliable firearm.

Well a local dealer finally got his "Vector built" V53 today.

DCP_1996.JPG


First off it still has those attrocious SW patented welds.

DCP_1998.JPG


DCP_1999.JPG


It is a sad thing that bicycle shops in Pakistan and Africa can more professionally weld a AK than these people can weld a HK type weapon.

Now the very first thing the apologist will do is refer you to the Vector website where they specifically compare the welds of a V53 to a "factory German" HK53.

http://www.vectorarms.com/guns/hk_rifles.htm

German gun:

HK53Closeup.gif


V53:

V53Closeup.gif


The only problem with the above is that is not a "factory German" HK53, it is a HK93 to HK53 conversion. Anyone who has seen a factory HK53 (which will be a dealer sample) knows those wleds are NOT on factory guns. In addition nobody knows who did the above conversion HK53 (RDTS would be my guess) but even the better smiths can do a 93 to 53 conversion without the sloppy welds.

I personally have a HK91 to 21 conversion that required a great deal of cuts and welds to attack the feed box, etc. and it is virtually devoid of assembly welds, but that is what talented conversion from places like FJ Vollmer are like.

If you go to the HK LE website, even with the tiny pics, you can even see that the welds on a factory 53 are nothing like the 'suppossed' HK53 on the Vector page.

hkweld.BMP


Now in fairness to Vector I doubt they are aware of these details and probably just accepted SWs (or in this case Tactical Weapons Training Academy) copy regarding the comparisson.

http://www.tactical-weapons.com/hk 53.htm
 
OK, the new batch has a improved muzzle device. I think the original one (which can be seen in the above link) looked like ????. I don't like this one much, but it's better looking than the first. Most people will probably spend the extra $200 to SBR this gun anyway. If you order the carbine you can submit a Form 1 request to build a SBR and won't have to pay a Class 3 dealer to Form 4 a already shortened rifle to you. The barrel attachment is reportedly pinned on and removable byt cutting a single weld.

DCP_2002.JPG


A few more dissapointments.

The usual lack of attention to detail is present.

Vector did not take the time to do things like paint the numbers on the sight turret and simply finished the entire gun.

DCP_2005.JPG


They didn't take the time to professionally shelf the trigger pack and just did the standard dremel tool cut.

DCP_2008.JPG


But none of that compares to whatever the hell they did here. The SW5 was notrious for it's tremendous slop in the mag well. Factory mags could do the hula dance given the excess play in the mag well and many mags wouldn't even lock in.

This one is just the opposite. Factory mags need a rubber mallet to be insterted into the gun. You will be able to fire a full mag in the time it takes to instert or extract a mag from this gun.

Dcp_2015.JPG


The front of the well actually looks hammered in rather than factory formed. Nothing like a gun professionally dented from the factory.

Now for the good part.

It seems tight and well built. If it is a case of "ugly but runs" many people will be happy. Those accustommed to CAI guns will be estatic. it doesn't have the usual "slop" associated with SW/TWTA firearms. There are no gaping holes, sharp stamped edges and it doesn't rattle when you shake it.

The bolt, although devoid of markings, appears to be factory HK or at least HK contract.

DCP_2011.JPG


Also it has been very professionally resized the 53 specs which almost leads me to think it began as a HK53 bolt. But I don't think they had 53 kits to work with, only 93.

A few items of interest. The carriers have the old style buffer on them which should make this a pretty tame .223 carbine to shoot.

DCP_2012.JPG


And for those who have registered sear packs, the sear trip channel has not been milled so these are ready to go by simply installing your registered pack.

DCP_2013.JPG


My overall impression is the V53 is a classic case of unrealized potential and I am dissapointed mostly because I had very high hopes for it. Had this gun been produced by CAI I'd be awed and amazed but would also only expect to pay $700 for it.

The critical test will of course be performance and I hope to shoot it next week. If it shoots reliably and accurately that will tip the overal balance in it's favor. If it doesn't don't even bother.

It 'looks' like it should perform well but so did the PTR91. The PTR was actually better looking than this and more professionally built but unfortuntaely came with more bugs than Windows 98 Version One.

Also considering Vector sells them for $1,350 and a dealer might conceivable sell them for $200-300 on top of that your are looking at a potential $1,600 carbine. You can definitely buy a reliable .223 for that.

If they do perform, I can see someone buying it as a practical carbine. Only a SOT can get and keep a original pre86 dealer sample HK53 and those are few and very expensive. A quality built HK53 will run you as much as $4,000 for a semi auto SBR.

Also should the AW Ban not be renewed one could conceiveable 'evil feature' the hell out of this thing. In either case, it wouldn't make a bad defensive carbine assuming it is reliable and acccurate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top