Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Thoughts on the 681?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by Tophernj, Oct 30, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Tophernj

    Tophernj Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2012
    Messages:
    630
    Location:
    PR of NJ
    I've recently become aware and intrigued by this revolver. I figure 6 rounds of 357 with fixed combat sights should do almost anyone right. However I don't know a lot about them. Any quirks they are known for? Issues?

    As always the advice is always appreciated and politely presented opposing opinions welcomed.

    C
     
  2. P5 Guy

    P5 Guy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,695
    Location:
    Tampa Bay area
    Assuming you are talking about the Smith & Wesson 681.
    There was an issue with the firing pin bushing and softer primers flowing back in the gap and locking the cylinder.
    Look on the frame under the cylinder yoke/crane where the model and revision number is stamped for the letter 'M'. That means the recall modification has been done, other wise no 'M' means the bushing is factory. While this may not present a problem in your revolver it does depend on the type and pressure of the ammunition you use.
    Take your find to the range and blast away. I have a S&W 681 and shoot it often. A fun gun for shooting 357MAG.
     
  3. pokersamurai

    pokersamurai Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2011
    Messages:
    26
    My 681 Performance Center is my favorite firearm I own.

    It has a fantastic trigger pull, fixed sights, 3-inch barrel, unfluted 7-shot cylinder that's cut for moon clips, and a two-tone Green/Black finish.



    DSCF6259_zps5b3c96b9.jpg
     
  4. Tophernj

    Tophernj Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2012
    Messages:
    630
    Location:
    PR of NJ
    Yes. Sorry. Smith and Wesson 681.

    C
     
  5. jmr40

    jmr40 Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    10,395
    Location:
    Georgia
    The recall only effected very early L frame guns made in the 1980's. Most all would be modified by now and if not it is a simple easy fix.

    Never owned one of the 681's, but it is one of those guns I wish I had bought. I remember seeing a few with round butts and 4" barrels in the early 90's at a very good price. I foolishly passed because I thought adjustable sights were important at the time.
     
  6. SharpsDressedMan

    SharpsDressedMan member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2007
    Messages:
    5,957
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    I don't know about everyone else, but the L-frames never got me excited. I always considered the Model 19/66 to be a perfectly balanced weapon, but it WAS too small to adequately handle a lot of full .357 loads. The L-frame could have been perfect, had they not added the full length lug on the barrel, but rather keeping it light like the Model 19. They thought it would attract the Colt Python fans, but without the vents, bright polish, and superior finishing of the Python, it was just less expensive, heavy and strong .357. I think the 4" L-frame was even heavier than the S&W 28 or 27 N-frames. But I DO respect the 581 and 681; strong serviceable guns, and really nice when given a custom action job.
     
  7. il.bill

    il.bill Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2011
    Messages:
    1,139
    Location:
    FOID Land (Illinois)
    I have a GunBroker S&W Model 681-1 Revolver coming by UPS for me to pick up from my local FFL transferring dealer on Friday. If it shoots anything like my 65-3 it will be one of my favorite handguns.

    Needless to say, the title of this thread caught my eye.
     
  8. Deaf Smith

    Deaf Smith Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2004
    Messages:
    4,708
    Location:
    TEXAS!
    Well I have a 4 inch 681,

    [​IMG]

    Shoots fine.

    I'd be tempted to have it made into a 3 inch but I already have a 3 inch 65 'Ladysmith' as well as 3 inch 686 Custom Service CS-1 version. So that kind of makes any conversion pointless.

    Deaf
     
  9. Jaymo

    Jaymo Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,530
    I NEVER liked the L frames, until I fondled mine in the LGS. After trying the trigger, I was sold.
    I like the underlug. It makes it distinctive looking.
     
  10. 4D5

    4D5 Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2004
    Messages:
    268
    Location:
    Nevada, Carson Valley
    I sure like mine.

    SW681.jpg
     
  11. jmfc606

    jmfc606 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2010
    Messages:
    43
    Location:
    Upstate NY
    The New York State Police were issued them in the mid Eighties. If you're lucky enough you'll come across one of them. They were marked on the side NYSP. I shot my buddies when he first became a trooper, very nice handling gun even with full power loads. Good luck with your search!!
     
  12. Radagast
    • Contributing Member

    Radagast Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,148
    Location:
    Australia/OZ
    The recall only affected the 681 & 681-1. 681-2 through to 681-5 are fine.
     
  13. lowercase

    lowercase Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Messages:
    395
    Location:
    Pacific Northwest
    My 681-1 (hasn't had the recall work done) has been a good gun.

    I like stainless, fixed-sight .357s, so it was right up my alley.

    Great trigger, and looks kinda cool with the full underlug.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2013
  14. 19-3Ben

    19-3Ben Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2006
    Messages:
    5,146
    Location:
    CT
    A mid frame .357mag with fixed sights that is strong enough to handle a serious pounding is going to be a winner. I love the 681, although I think my heart still belongs to the Speed Six.
     
  15. Deaf Smith

    Deaf Smith Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2004
    Messages:
    4,708
    Location:
    TEXAS!
    But of course!

    And that is why I also have a few Speed Sixs to!

    Deaf
     
  16. bluekouki86

    bluekouki86 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2013
    Messages:
    236
    Always wanted one, but refuse to pay $500 for a beat up service revolver. For that kind of money I'll get a 686.
     
  17. kellmark

    kellmark Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2008
    Messages:
    75
    I love mine

    I have the early 681 bought new in the 1980's. Great trigger and balance, Never a problem.
     
  18. mlw270win

    mlw270win Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2006
    Messages:
    16
    Location:
    Texas
    I have a couple of 681's and they are my favorite revolvers. They both have 7 shot cylinders in them now and shot great. You just can't beat a older S&W trigger and the L frames will handle all the 357 mag. you can feed it.
     
  19. golden

    golden Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,071
    Was my first personally owned duty gun

    I carried a 681 for about a year before going to the GLOCK 19. I prefer autos, but if you want an outstanding self defense revolver, the 681 is it.

    My has been MAGNA-PORTED and had the action slicked. I use HOGUE grips and consider this the best combat revolver I have ever had or shot.

    One down side is the weight. You will notice it at the end of a 8 or 10 hour day. Other than that, I recommend it highly.

    Jim
     
  20. ArchAngelCD

    ArchAngelCD Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    22,575
    Location:
    Northeast PA, USA
    I'm a little surprised S&W doesn't have a current K/L frame .357 Magnum with fixed sights.

    No more M13, M65, M581, M681 or M619... What's up with dat?
     
  21. WJR

    WJR Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2003
    Messages:
    218
    Location:
    AL, USA
    If I really wanted a 681, I would in turn look no further than a Ruger GP100 3" barrel with fixed sights.

    Ruger makes the pistol that all 681 fans wish S&W would make, without silly locks.

    WJR
     
  22. Oro

    Oro Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Messages:
    3,496
    Location:
    WA state
    S&W made very, very few 681's with a lock. 97% of them or more don't have it. I've owned several Rugers; liked them. But they are not forged steel S&Ws and won't ever be batting in those leagues.

    I have had a 681, and two 686s - one 2.5" and one 4". Of the three, only the 4" 686 is still in my house. And it gets pride of place in the home as it and a full-house Novak Custom Colt 1911 are the only two guns I keep as nightstand guns. Lots of others can do the job just as well, but those are the two that get the honors.

    The 681 is fine, but the sights are just not as quick or accurate as those on a 686. And the S&W adjustable sights have proven plenty durable and rugged over time, no reason to worry about them on a carry, duty, or field gun.

    As to the 2.5" 686, it's just too bulky to me for a cc gun, and for a light-use weapon like that (e.g, not a lot of rounds down range typically vs. amount carried), the 19/66 just shines for that.

    The 4" L frame will "out shoot" a 4" 19/66 or even a 27. The L frame has more weight than the K, but the full lug makes it so much more softer shooting. the K is of course handier, so it depends which you value - quick pointing or softer shooting/faster on 2nd shot. Weight is the same between a 686 and a comparable N (3.5" or 4" 27 or 28), but the weight is lower and more compact so it handles a bit better and has better recoil characteristics.

    For flat-out shooting, pick a 4" 686. For sexiness, a 3.5" 27. For carry, a 2.5" 19/66. I've got one of each and two of the latter. The 681 is a fine gun, and if you can get one at a good price, go for it. But if prices are narrow in difference, I prefer the 686 for the sights.

    K, L, N:
    IMGP5071.jpg

    This photo may be more illustrative. All that weight under the barrel makes it less handy than a 19/66, but it still enables it to be, as it quite literally was, a "Python Killer."
    IMGP5072.jpg
     
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2013
  23. Snake Plisskin

    Snake Plisskin Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2012
    Messages:
    178
    Location:
    SW Virginia
    I too prefer sights on my revolver just a personal thing for me so the 686 4" has a warm spot in my heart and on my night stand. Good of luck on your journey to find what suits you best, you can't wrong with a Smith.

    e91782df-066f-437b-929a-5653749cd585.gif
     
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2013
  24. il.bill

    il.bill Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2011
    Messages:
    1,139
    Location:
    FOID Land (Illinois)
  25. Deaf Smith

    Deaf Smith Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2004
    Messages:
    4,708
    Location:
    TEXAS!
    GP-100 as well as 2 1/2 686 and 2 1/2 S&W 66, 3 inch 65 'ladysmith', Ruger SP101, Speed Six, and Secularity Six are on this photo of my guns (and a few others.)

    [​IMG]

    You can see the size difference

    Deaf
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page