TITEGROUP instead of BULLSEYE

[il.bill]

I consider my use of Titegroup when unable to find Bullseye locally to be a pleasant success. I am somewhat frugal and appreciate the relative low cost per round of Bullseye and Titegroup for target loads. I loaded up several dozen cartridges and tried them out - they all made round holes in the paper. I reload relatively small batches on a single stage press, weighing every charge on a small Franklin digital scale, so I feel pretty good about avoiding double charges in the big cases as long as I pay attention.

For some reason, I have just not been able to get into Unique. Win 231 and WST will likely be my next two choices, if I later find no Bullseye or Titegroup on my local shelves.

 

[Pilot]

I've been using Titegroup mostly for 9MM, but have also used it for .45 ACP, and even .45 Colt with good results. I have not noticed any negatives, about it, although it may be a little snappier than some others, but most of my loads are moderate pressure, target loads, so not an issue. I do like Clays a little better for .45 ACP because I have been using it for years, but Titegroup works if I can't get Clays.

 

[evan price]

I use lots and lots of Titegroup. It's pretty interchangeable with Bullseye in terms of speed and charge weights (but not actually interchangeable).
I like TG but it requires a steady and careful reloader to not make a kaboomy mistake.