mordechaianiliewicz
Member
I have a proposal which is currently going to be sent to the Libertarian Party. It is a proposal based upon theoretical meanderings late at night over coffee and cigarettes, reading just about every Constitutional History book I could get my hands on since I was 16 or so to now, and talks with both liberal and conservative people unhappy with our current political parties.
This proposal is simple.
Instead of the Libertarian Party focusing on purity tests, removing government from all portions of your life, and running for the Presidency on platforms which are laughed at, I have a very simple propossal.
A return to state's rights, and prerogatives, elimination of IRS, and income tax on the federal level, and power resting on regional and state level decisions in more direct voting systems.
I realized that we didn't get to the massive behemoth of a fedgov we have today overnight, but instead by the people deciding piece by piece that they wanted one thing or another, and then the fedgov providing it. If we want a decent, and responsible fedgov, we will need it to be involved in as little as possible.
The problem with both the Democrats and the Republicans is that they are urging on this gutting of the states right's and responsibilites. Look at books by Jesse Jackson Jr. and you have the basic plot on the left. As for the Right, they want it phased in over time.
What of the Greens. They want it RFN! They are advocates of even more federal power than the Democrats.
What of the Constitutionalists? While not nearly as bad, they are scary theocrats.
The Libertarians are the best hope for this, but so far they have been seeing so far ahead for so long, they don't realize incrementalism is what is necessary to bring us back.
Many Liberals and Conservatives think the federal government is too big, too bloated, and too powerfull, but they want the social programs it provides. Ultimately, the government becomes a neccessary evil literally for them. My suggestion is that the fedgov give the social welfare programs back to the states to do with as they see fit.
Most Conservatives see elimination of those programs. Whereas most Liberals see more efficient usage of the tax dollars. Either way, a government on the federal level which does follow the Constitution entiely means a much more stable country overall.
I suggest 50 laboratories. 50 places where we get to experiment with Republic. If Massachusetts wants public healthcare, they can have it, but it is not forced down the throats of people in Montana, Wyoming, Georgia, etc. If Texas wants abortions banned they have it. If New York has a whack 'em attitude, so be it. You either vote with your feet, or you work for change on a state level. States would even decide their laws concerning drug policy. Even though many people in Mass, NY, and Kali would be mad, guns would be a state level thing as well. Which could easily mean plenty of states developing extremely reasonable laws. If you don't like Kali, vote with your feet, or fight for change.
Talking about the elimination of SSI and all forms of welfare gets the Libertarians nowhere. People have come to love their chains and will not get rid of them until they see how life is without all that government interference. Allow a state like Utah, Nevada, or Texas to have a private retirement account program, independent of the fedgov, and people will demand an end to SS.
This is my plan, I submit it to you for review, criticism, and hopefully, approval.
This proposal is simple.
Instead of the Libertarian Party focusing on purity tests, removing government from all portions of your life, and running for the Presidency on platforms which are laughed at, I have a very simple propossal.
A return to state's rights, and prerogatives, elimination of IRS, and income tax on the federal level, and power resting on regional and state level decisions in more direct voting systems.
I realized that we didn't get to the massive behemoth of a fedgov we have today overnight, but instead by the people deciding piece by piece that they wanted one thing or another, and then the fedgov providing it. If we want a decent, and responsible fedgov, we will need it to be involved in as little as possible.
The problem with both the Democrats and the Republicans is that they are urging on this gutting of the states right's and responsibilites. Look at books by Jesse Jackson Jr. and you have the basic plot on the left. As for the Right, they want it phased in over time.
What of the Greens. They want it RFN! They are advocates of even more federal power than the Democrats.
What of the Constitutionalists? While not nearly as bad, they are scary theocrats.
The Libertarians are the best hope for this, but so far they have been seeing so far ahead for so long, they don't realize incrementalism is what is necessary to bring us back.
Many Liberals and Conservatives think the federal government is too big, too bloated, and too powerfull, but they want the social programs it provides. Ultimately, the government becomes a neccessary evil literally for them. My suggestion is that the fedgov give the social welfare programs back to the states to do with as they see fit.
Most Conservatives see elimination of those programs. Whereas most Liberals see more efficient usage of the tax dollars. Either way, a government on the federal level which does follow the Constitution entiely means a much more stable country overall.
I suggest 50 laboratories. 50 places where we get to experiment with Republic. If Massachusetts wants public healthcare, they can have it, but it is not forced down the throats of people in Montana, Wyoming, Georgia, etc. If Texas wants abortions banned they have it. If New York has a whack 'em attitude, so be it. You either vote with your feet, or you work for change on a state level. States would even decide their laws concerning drug policy. Even though many people in Mass, NY, and Kali would be mad, guns would be a state level thing as well. Which could easily mean plenty of states developing extremely reasonable laws. If you don't like Kali, vote with your feet, or fight for change.
Talking about the elimination of SSI and all forms of welfare gets the Libertarians nowhere. People have come to love their chains and will not get rid of them until they see how life is without all that government interference. Allow a state like Utah, Nevada, or Texas to have a private retirement account program, independent of the fedgov, and people will demand an end to SS.
This is my plan, I submit it to you for review, criticism, and hopefully, approval.