A long time ago when I was woodworking my Dad told me to “measure twice, cut onceâ€. I’ve applied that advice to most everything in life. It helps to eliminate stupid mistakes, especially in reloading. Whenever possible before I decide on a particular recipe I check another reloading manual just to make sure they are both in the same parade.
Proof readers must get terrible headaches, but how ‘bout the guy that proof reads reloading manuals. If he doesn’t catch a “typo†the consequences could be disastrous for someone who doesn’t “measure twiceâ€! How about 4.6 gr. of 231 transposed to 6.4 gr. when working near the upper limit. That’s a jump of 1.8 gr. or 39 %. Sure, most of us would notice that the 6.4 did not follow the progression, but how about someone who is new to reloading or is just always in too much of a hurry.
Personally, I’ve never stumbled across a “typo†such as this and was wondering if any of you guys ever did. If these mistakes are truly non-existent, how are they prevented?
Proof readers must get terrible headaches, but how ‘bout the guy that proof reads reloading manuals. If he doesn’t catch a “typo†the consequences could be disastrous for someone who doesn’t “measure twiceâ€! How about 4.6 gr. of 231 transposed to 6.4 gr. when working near the upper limit. That’s a jump of 1.8 gr. or 39 %. Sure, most of us would notice that the 6.4 did not follow the progression, but how about someone who is new to reloading or is just always in too much of a hurry.
Personally, I’ve never stumbled across a “typo†such as this and was wondering if any of you guys ever did. If these mistakes are truly non-existent, how are they prevented?