MachIVshooter
Member
Lots of good points being discussed in this thread.
As for the study on the threat LEO's face, that scarcely applies to the CC'er. The LEO's are known to be armed and a threat to that criminial, so they're immediately targeted.
It is very true that we should never under estimate our opponent. That said, the criminal who goes after an armed citizen has made exactly that mistake, and that gives us the initial advantage. Where it goes from there, however, is wholly dependent on circumstances and our response.
I would never assume that an attacker has inferior skills or eqiupment. That would be foolish, to say the least. But what I'm counting on is reaction time. If the BG wanted me dead, he'd most likely have shot or stabbed me from behind before I ever had a chance to defend myself. If he's threatening me with a gun, he wants something else. Like my money. If he's standing back a bit and I'm the one "going for my wallet", I'll produce my weapon instead, and even the most alert and quickest people on the planet are unlikely to be able to react in less time than I can get off a shot once he realizes it's not a wallet in my hand.
In the other robbery instance I can think of, the BG is holding the weapon at contact distance while he attempts to get the goods. In this case, I'll not be going for my weapon, at least not initially. The reaction time still comes into play, but in this instance, it's him not being able to dodge my moves, whether that may be grappling/disarmament, or striking a blow to knock him down/disorient him, so I can make my next calculated move.
I think the key to successful defense is that beyond the inital encounter, we become proactive, rather than reactive. Keep the advantage you have.
As for the study on the threat LEO's face, that scarcely applies to the CC'er. The LEO's are known to be armed and a threat to that criminial, so they're immediately targeted.
It is very true that we should never under estimate our opponent. That said, the criminal who goes after an armed citizen has made exactly that mistake, and that gives us the initial advantage. Where it goes from there, however, is wholly dependent on circumstances and our response.
I would never assume that an attacker has inferior skills or eqiupment. That would be foolish, to say the least. But what I'm counting on is reaction time. If the BG wanted me dead, he'd most likely have shot or stabbed me from behind before I ever had a chance to defend myself. If he's threatening me with a gun, he wants something else. Like my money. If he's standing back a bit and I'm the one "going for my wallet", I'll produce my weapon instead, and even the most alert and quickest people on the planet are unlikely to be able to react in less time than I can get off a shot once he realizes it's not a wallet in my hand.
In the other robbery instance I can think of, the BG is holding the weapon at contact distance while he attempts to get the goods. In this case, I'll not be going for my weapon, at least not initially. The reaction time still comes into play, but in this instance, it's him not being able to dodge my moves, whether that may be grappling/disarmament, or striking a blow to knock him down/disorient him, so I can make my next calculated move.
I think the key to successful defense is that beyond the inital encounter, we become proactive, rather than reactive. Keep the advantage you have.