Update to Medford man's guns taken

Status
Not open for further replies.

padd54

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2008
Messages
140
Location
Central Oregon
The other thread was closed.
I just got an email from the Oregon Firearms Federation, here is the info;

"OUTRAGE
Imagine your telephone ringing in the middle of the night. The caller informs you that he is a police officer. He wants to "get you the help and appropriate resources you need." But wait, you have not asked for any help, don't need any help, and certainly don't want this "help" in the middle of the night.

But this offer of "help" and "appropriate resources" is an offer you can't refuse. You see, your home is surrounded by SWAT teams from multiple jurisdictions. There are men in helmets with machine guns everywhere. Snipers are aiming at your home. You are told to come outside. You are promised you won't be arrested, handcuffed or removed from your property. You are told your possessions will not be confiscated. The friendly paramilitary troops outside your house just want to chat with you.


Any rational person would recognize the danger in refusing the orders of dozens of heavily armed cops.

You leave your home and immediately you are handcuffed at gunpoint and taken to a mental hospital for a "psychological evaluation." The police enter your home without a warrant, without permission, without probable cause and confiscate your firearms.

You have NOT been "arrested" so you have no right to an attorney. You have no right to remain silent. You are subjected to a "hold." You can be held for up to 180 days. You can be medicated against your will. Your crime? The lawful and state-approved purchase of firearms.

None of this is fiction or speculation. It happened to an Oregonian on March 8th. This is the new face of "gun control" in the age of Obama. Buy a gun, go to a mental hospital.

David Pyles of Medford Oregon purchased several firearms between March 5th and 7th. In Oregon, a firearms purchase made through a dealer requires the approval of the Oregon State Police. David received approvals for all purchases, but it was these legal purchases that the police used to justify the raid on David's home and the state-sponsored kidnapping that followed.

Shortly before David made these purchases, he had been put on "administrative leave" from his job at the Oregon Department of Transportation. He was involved in a dispute with a superior which he was attempting to resolve though normal channels and union procedures when he was told he would have to work from home.

His gun purchases were long planned and the result of some extra cash he had on hand because of a tax refund. David already owned other firearms. But the State Police, after approving his purchases, contacted local law enforcement in what, at this time, appears to be a blatant violation of the law. And because his employer accused him of being "disgruntled," his perfectly legal gun buys became the excuse for an unlawful and unwarranted attack on his freedom and property.

A few hours after being dragged to an involuntary "psychological evaluation" David was released following clinical psychiatric evaluation which determined he was sane, of no threat to anyone, and of no threat or harm to himself. But the police kept his guns. At first, he was told he would have to wait 2 to 4 weeks to get his confiscated property back, but widespread attention and outrage by media and bloggers forced the police to return his guns.

His employer meanwhile posted notices warning other workers to run away if they saw David and call police. They also said David had made no threats to anyone.

David broke no law. He committed no crime and threatened no one. Yet, with no warrant and no probable cause, David was dragged off into the night by heavily armed troops with no legal authority to do so and he was given none of the protections a common thief would get from the legal system.

We cannot say how his life will be affected by this incident, especially now that, thanks to the NRA and the Brady Campaign joining forces, "mental health" records are being sent by the states to the Obama administration. We do know that this is a very dangerous situation and one the police have refused to explain or justify.

You can read an excellent and in depth review or what happened to David here and here. You can listen to an audio version here. You can download an in-depth analysis of the dangers of these kinds of raids here.

The Oregon Firearms Federation has been in contact with David since soon after the incident. He as recently expressed an interest in getting some assistance in his legal battle to hold the various actors in this chilling fiasco accountable.

This is a case with nationwide implications. All gun owners, in fact all Americans should be horrified and fearful of the"Minority Report" implications of taking someone by force in the absence of any crime or even an indication that a crime was planned.

What the gun grabbers have failed to achieve legislatively, they are trying to do the old-fashioned Soviet way. Just claim you're mentally ill and "not cooperating."

If you would like to assist David in his battle against this outrageous deprivation of his rights, the Oregon Firearms Educational Foundation has set up a fund for him. You may make a tax deductible donation to the Foundation or if you prefer, you can make a donation directly to David.
David Pyles
c/o the "David Pyles Legal Defense Fund"
P.O. Box 728
Medford, OR 97501 "
 
if he has a good slander case he won't need donations the landsharks will be fist fighting to get his case
 
My guess is that David Pyle is just counting down the days until a REALLY BIG check comes in the mail.
 
Benign benevolent Big Brother my arse. It is frightening how easily our Constitution is swept aside - albiet temporarily. I hope he takes in a lot of ducats from .gov.
 
It's very easy to blame the Police.However,what do you think if the same thing occured but the Police didn't act as they did and Mr. Pyles then goes on a rampage?The cops would be hung out to dry.The real culprit is the employer.He should be the one gone after.
 
This is unreal!... I have bought guns after being laid off... ya know why? BECAUSE i all of a sudden had TIME to go shooting... and unlike all the Obama fans who expect to be taken care of by their commie government, I was a responsible adult and had a SAVINGS account with money in it!....

Hope heads roll on this one

I didn't know Oregon had such advanced technology to see into the future... its like that movie Minority Report

acub7t.jpg
 
It's very easy to blame the Police.However,what do you think if the same thing occured but the Police didn't act as they did and Mr. Pyles then goes on a rampage?The cops would be hung out to dry.The real culprit is the employer.He should be the one gone after.

Gun owner or not, you have lived in Mass too long and its affecting your judgment
 
The OP said:
"OUTRAGE
Imagine your telephone ringing in the middle of the night. The caller informs you that he is a police officer. He wants to "get you the help and appropriate resources you need." But wait, you have not asked for any help, don't need any help, and certainly don't want this "help" in the middle of the night.

But this offer of "help" and "appropriate resources" is an offer you can't refuse. You see, your home is surrounded by SWAT teams from multiple jurisdictions. There are men in helmets with machine guns everywhere. Snipers are aiming at your home. You are told to come outside. You are promised you won't be arrested, handcuffed or removed from your property. You are told your possessions will not be confiscated. The friendly paramilitary troops outside your house just want to chat with you.

My response would have been:

"If all you want to do is talk to me, call back in the morning. If all you want to do is talk to me, why did you send a troupe of assassins?"

Woody


"Knowing the past, I'll not surrender any arms and march less prepared into the future." B.E.Wood
 
I hope he has a heck of a payday coming and doesn't have to work again, and his superior loses her job.

It's very easy to blame the Police.However,what do you think if the same thing occured but the Police didn't act as they did and Mr. Pyles then goes on a rampage?The cops would be hung out to dry.The real culprit is the employer.He should be the one gone after.
True, but what if you have a tiff with someone and find yourself in his shoes? We don't know that YOU won't go on a rampage either. They pulled out all the stops for someone who did nothing wrong. What law were they enforcing? I wouldn't hang the police out to dry for not raiding someone based on a tip from an anti-gun .gov employee when no crime has been comitted. That could easily be any of us.
 
This employer needs to get hit by a bus. I'm serious...
His employer is the state of Oregon. He works for the Dept of Transportation.

Shortly before David made these purchases, he had been put on "administrative leave" from his job at the Oregon Department of Transportation.

He can sue the state but he must get permission from the state to do it. No such permission necessary to sue the cops who are the real problem. They over reacted to a report from a bliss ninny.
 
This employer needs to get hit by a bus. I'm serious...

The SWAT team will appear at your doorstep momentarily. :what: Just do what they say and try to convince the guys in white lab coats that you're sane. The only friends you'll have for the next year and a half will be lawyers, the greedier the better. Good luck. ;)
 
Last edited:
^^ Haha, the SWAT guys around here are pretty worthless. Every time they are called somewhere they manage to get innocents killed, no matter what they do.

As for the Department of Transportation boss... that'd be pretty ironic, being hit by a bus. :D
 
Last edited:
It's very easy to blame the Police.However,what do you think if the same thing occured but the Police didn't act as they did and Mr. Pyles then goes on a rampage?The cops would be hung out to dry.The real culprit is the employer.He should be the one gone after.

If he went on a rampage, it would have been his fault and his fault alone, not the fault of the government through inaction.
 
It's very easy to blame the Police.However,what do you think if the same thing occured but the Police didn't act as they did and Mr. Pyles then goes on a rampage?The cops would be hung out to dry.The real culprit is the employer.He should be the one gone after.

No, they would not have been "hung out to dry" since he had not committed a crime, nor had he made any indication of threatening behavior whatsoever (lawful gun purchases don't count as threats). However, the despicable action they did take will in fact have some of them "hung out to dry". I guarantee it. His employer and the local authorities need to be seriously punished for this.
 
When your liberty can be taken away for what you might do, and even so done merely at the whispers of a "concerned third party" with the full weight of civil authorities, you're in a scary situation. I'm not going to invoke Godwin's Law here, but it certainly is something to take note of. Having said that, I think there is no reason to fear as long as he makes his case known and the guilty parties are reprimanded.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top