US Marshal arrested, charged w/ murder in MD shooting

Status
Not open for further replies.

Archangel

Member
Joined
May 27, 2003
Messages
243
Location
Maryland
http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/apps/policenews/press/DisplayInfo.cfm?ItemID=1491

Update-Deputy U.S. Marshal Arrested, Charged in Last Week�s Shooting

At about 8:30 this morning, Montgomery County Police detectives arrested Deputy United States Marshal Arthur Lloyd, 53, and charged him with murder in the shooting death of 20-year-old Ryan Stowers that occurred last Thursday.

The police investigation indicates that on October 28, Lloyd was off-duty and was driving on Rockville Pike with his family in his black Ford Expedition when he became engaged in a traffic altercation with Stowers who was driving a red Chevrolet Camaro. Both motorists pulled into the parking lot of the Mid-Pike Plaza in Rockville and got out of their cars. A verbal dispute in the parking lot then escalated into a physical altercation. At some point, Lloyd drew his service handgun and fired one round striking Stowers in his lower right leg. Stowers called 911 using his cell phone, and then got back into his car. Eventually, Stowers began to drive away. Lloyd then fired multiple times, with one round striking Stowers in the back near his left shoulder. Stowers was taken to Suburban Hospital where he was pronounced dead. Lloyd was taken to a local hospital where he was treated and released for a broken thumb and other injuries he sustained during the altercation.

Detectives from the Major Crimes Division have been working cooperatively with representatives from the Montgomery County State's Attorney's Office since the night of the shooting. Detectives obtained a warrant for Lloyd, and this morning, they arrested Lloyd at his Montgomery County home.

Lloyd has been charged with First-Degree Murder, Use of a Handgun in the Commission of a Crime of Violence, and Reckless Endangerment. Lloyd was held without bond at the Montgomery County Detention Center. According to the U.S. Marshal�s Service, Lloyd has now been suspended without pay.

Montgomery County Police Chief J. Thomas Manger said, "We understand there have been questions from the public and the media regarding why the individual involved was not charged prior to this point. I want you to know that investigators have interviewed over 40 witnesses, reviewed and evaluated extensive physical and forensic evidence, and have consulted with members of the State's Attorney's Office throughout this investigation. As a result of the information gleaned from the interviews and the evidence, we, in conjunction with the State's Attorney's Office, believe it is now appropriate to bring charges in this case. We also appreciate the cooperation and support we have received from the U.S. Marshal's Service from the onset of this investigation."
 
http://www.washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20041105-102432-7055r

www.washingtontimes.com

Marshal's abusive past cited in court

By Stephen Manning
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published November 6, 2004

A deputy U.S. marshal charged with murder in a fatal shooting last week has a history of infractions as a law-enforcement officer and past problems with domestic violence -- a pattern prosecutors said may explain why he fatally shot a Navy seaman after a fistfight in a Rockville parking lot.

Marshal Arthur Lloyd, 53, faces first-degree murder and other charges in the fatal shooting of Seaman Ryan Stowers, 20, in the back as the sailor tried to drive away from the scene of the Oct. 28 incident. Marshal Lloyd was off-duty at the time and his wife and children witnessed the shooting.

During a bond hearing yesterday, Montgomery County Deputy State's Attorney John McCarthy said Marshal Lloyd's wife and son had accused him of abuse. Mr. McCarthy said he also had been disciplined by the Marshals Service for infractions.

In 1985, Marshal Lloyd made a $10,000 payment to a federal inmate to settle a civil case against him after he tied the prisoner's hands and feet, verbally abused the inmate and read him passages from the Bible, Mr. McCarthy said. He was suspended without pay but not charged.

The prosecutor also cited several cases where police were called to Marshal Lloyd's home on reports of domestic abuse. In 1999, he reportedly threw his 18-year-old son through a glass window. His wife also obtained at least two protective orders against her husband after he reportedly threatened to kill her in 1999 and broke a kitchen door with her head in 2001.

In all cases, Marshal Lloyd's son and wife later asked for the orders to be dropped or did not cooperate with police. He was never charged with any crimes, Mr. McCarthy said.

The pattern of violence may explain why a traffic altercation escalated into a lethal shooting, Mr. McCarthy said.

"This was a man out of control," he said.

Montgomery County District Court Judge Brian Kim ordered Marshal Lloyd to be held without bond on the charges of murder, reckless endangerment and use of a handgun during a felony. He could face life in prison without parole if convicted.

Marshal Lloyd, who suffered a broken thumb and black eye during the fight, appeared from the county detention center via a video link. He spoke only to answer simple questions from the judge and propped the large cast on his left forearm on the podium in front of him.

Halfway through the hearing, a man identified as Marshal Lloyd's brother collapsed and had to be taken out of the courthouse on a stretcher.

One side of the small courtroom was filled with family, friends and fellow marshals. His wife, Wanda Lloyd, who prosecutors said had tried to stop the shooting, sat in the front row.

Defense attorney Stefanie Roemer said Marshal Lloyd did not intend to kill Seaman Stowers and did his best to defuse the incident. She said the deputy first shot Seaman Stowers in the ankle with his service handgun to try to stop the fight and that he was trying to protect his wife and children, who sat in a nearby sport utility vehicle.

"If anything, Mr. Lloyd exercised restraint in the face of a dangerous situation," she said. "He could have just shot him in the back."

Miss Roemer said Marshal Lloyd, a 28-year veteran of the Marshals Service who was posted at U.S. District Court in Washington, had a clean criminal record despite the reports of domestic violence and prisoner abuse.

"It's a shame he's been characterized as a hothead, a gunslinger. That's not him at all," said Matthew Fogg, who served with Marshal Lloyd for 20 years.

According to Mr. McCarthy and court documents, Marshal Lloyd and Seaman Stowers started fighting in the Mid-Pike Plaza parking lot after some form of traffic altercation. After Marshal Lloyd shot Seaman Stowers in the leg, the seaman called 911 and retreated to his car.

Marshal Lloyd pulled out his identification and ordered Seaman Stowers to get out of the car. Mr. McCarthy said one of the 40 witnesses interviewed told police that Marshal Lloyd shouted, "Move that car again and I'll shoot you. I'll shoot you in the head."

Seaman Stowers pulled around the marshal and started to leave. According to Mr. McCarthy, Marshal Lloyd stepped in behind the car as it pulled away and fired three shots. One struck the sailor in the back, and he crashed into a nearby store.

However, Miss Roemer said Seaman Stowers drove his car toward Marshal Lloyd as he left, threatening the deputy and his family.
 
An old story - they know there is a problem but everyone looks the other way! Eventually it becomes a disaster.
 
His wife also obtained at least two protective orders against her husband after he reportedly threatened to kill her in 1999 and broke a kitchen door with her head in 2001.
_____________________________________
Isn't he prohibited from owing a handgun under the Brady Bill or is this another case of rules for thee but not for me.
 
And yet he was still a US Marshall. Apparently you have to murder someone in broad daylight with dozens of witnesses before you don't get to be a Marshall anymore.
 
molonlabe said:
_____________________________________
Isn't he prohibited from owing a handgun under the Brady Bill or is this another case of rules for thee but not for me.

The Lautenberg amendment to the Brady bill, I believe. But I think they changed it to allow (only) peace officers to keep their handguns even if convicted of domestic violence or restraining orders. That's very general and from memory, I'm sure one of our legal eagles can put that into finer detail and correct my errors.
 
What a mess!

That marshall is in a heap of trouble. He got into a road rage incident, didn't ID himself as a LEO until well into it, and shot a guy (non-felon?) trying to leave. Throw in his history, he's in deep doo-doo.
 
Marshal Lloyd pulled out his identification and ordered Seaman Stowers to get out of the car. Mr. McCarthy said one of the 40 witnesses interviewed told police that Marshal Lloyd shouted, "Move that car again and I'll shoot you. I'll shoot you in the head."

Seaman Stowers pulled around the marshal and started to leave. According to Mr. McCarthy, Marshal Lloyd stepped in behind the car as it pulled away and fired three shots. One struck the sailor in the back, and he crashed into a nearby store.
IMO this is abuse of power and intimidation by a LEO pure and simple. The marshall wasn't acting as a police officer when the altercation occured and had no authority(?) to try and detain the seaman.

He certainly had no right to shoot the young man when he was retreating from a bad incident already wounded by the maniac marshall.

I'm not sure 1st degree murder is justified. Seems more like heat of the moment stuff and therefore 2nd degree but this marshall is one LEO that shouldn't be on the street and belongs instead in prison - for a very, very long time.
 
His defense attorney really needs to come up with some different arguments.
Defense attorney Stefanie Roemer said Marshal Lloyd did not intend to kill Seaman Stowers and did his best to defuse the incident.
Since when does getting out of your vehicle and fighting with someone, count as defusing the situation.
"He could have just shot him in the back."
:scrutiny: Uh, that's what he did. They must have stuck him with a public defender or maybe she just walked into the courtroom without even reading about the case.

It's a good thing LEOs get to ignore their domestic violence history when it comes to owning firearms. :rolleyes:
 
Werewolf said:
I'm not sure 1st degree murder is justified.

Here is your premeditation. It doesnt have to take long.

"Marshal Lloyd shouted, 'Move that car again and I'll shoot you. I'll shoot you in the head.'"

A head shot is designed to kill, not to stop.
 
Why this person still held a badge & gun is a question that should be answered by his superiors; among others.


Tallpine stated : Another example of why only police should have guns.

How is that statement relevant to this story?? If you have a agenda, let's hear it.

In every profession there is good & bad, lumping them all together because of small % are incompetent is painting with a very large brush indeed. Looks like this "officer" will be going before a jury of his peers = as he should be.

Tragic for all those concerned.

12-34hom.
 
12-34hom said:
How is that statement relevant to this story?? If you have a agenda, let's hear it.

In every profession there is good & bad, lumping them all together because of small % are incompetent is painting with a very large brush indeed. Looks like this "officer" will be going before a jury of his peers = as he should be.

Tragic for all those concerned.

12-34hom.

I hate to speak for someone else, but I think that what you are saying is exactly his point. Becoming a LEO doesn't automatically make you the magical gun-guru that people think it does. Just like owning a gun does not make you the automatic psycho that people think it does.
 
Harry Tuttle said:
What are the federal repercussions of a US Marshall murdering a Navyman?
None. The military doesn't have special laws that make you a worse murderer like the police do.
 
But Why Do LEO

12-34hom said:
Why this person still held a badge & gun is a question that should be answered by his superiors; among others.




How is that statement relevant to this story?? If you have a agenda, let's hear it.

In every profession there is good & bad, lumping them all together because of small % are incompetent is painting with a very large brush indeed. Looks like this "officer" will be going before a jury of his peers = as he should be.

Tragic for all those concerned.

12-34hom.
Why do LEO tolorate BAD cops? It's already a crime for the unwashed masses to not report crime ain't it?
I gotta be the first one here to return to the thrilling days of Ruby Ridge and Waco where other murders were swept into history.
 
Miss Roemer said Marshal Lloyd, a 28-year veteran of the Marshals Service who was posted at U.S. District Court in Washington, had a clean criminal record despite the reports of domestic violence and prisoner abuse.

oh.. is that all....well as long as his record was clean other than several violent assaults :scrutiny:
 
How is that statement relevant to this story?? If you have a agenda, let's hear it.
This story is relevant to the argument of the anti-gun folks, that only trained professionals can be trusted with guns. Imagine what we would be hearing if this guy was Joe Average CCW holder ...

Agenda ...? Oh, just something about the right to keep and bear arms.
 
Good cops dont tolerate bad cops.

Cops dont get a pass on domestic violence convictions. Those that had convictions lost their positions (if they were able to keep them anyway) when the DV clause when into effect, and any new convictions will also get them tossed or demoted to a non-armed position, something like meter attendent.
 
What was your issue again?

"He certainly had no right to shoot the young man when he was retreating from a bad incident already wounded by the maniac marshall.

I'm not sure 1st degree murder is justified."

What part of "RETREATING" did you miss? Let's review:


"Stowers called 911 using his cell phone, and then got back into his car. Eventually, Stowers began to drive away. Lloyd then fired multiple times, with one round striking Stowers in the back near his left shoulder."

The deceased:

1. Calls competent (we hope) authorities to deal with this psycho one;

2. DISENGAGES from the confrontation;

3. Tries to LEAVE the area of the armed psycho who shot him; and

4. Is shot IN THE BACK as he leaves.

Where in all this did the deceased pose a threat to the shooter?
Where in all this is there a sudden, spontaneous action by the shooter?
Where is there an excuse for LESS than a Murder 1 charge? :cuss:

Thank God this bully wasn't leading the "Elian Rescue Mission"...... :what:
 
I wonder if the reckless endangerment charge is in relation to the fact that one of his stray rounds killed a dog?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top