I'm not upset. I'm just using hyperbole to respond to the previous poster, in an attempt to show him what his thinking might lead to.
It just seems (from the admittedly limited info in the article), that an unfamiliar guy approached his back door from the outside. I suppose the door was open so he could see him. And the shooter made many assumptions when shooting him.
Assumptions he made:
1. The guy is the burglar. True
2. The guy is armed. False
3. The guy's intent is to cause deadly harm to shooter. Unlikely, with no weapon, and early return of shooter
I'm just saying he's really lucky not to have been charged.
It just seems (from the admittedly limited info in the article), that an unfamiliar guy approached his back door from the outside. I suppose the door was open so he could see him. And the shooter made many assumptions when shooting him.
Assumptions he made:
1. The guy is the burglar. True
2. The guy is armed. False
3. The guy's intent is to cause deadly harm to shooter. Unlikely, with no weapon, and early return of shooter
I'm just saying he's really lucky not to have been charged.