Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

wanting a peep sight for a marlin 1894C .357 mag rifle

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by shrewd, Feb 19, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. shrewd

    shrewd Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2011
    Messages:
    120
    Location:
    philadelphia
    I understand quite a few of you guys out there, especially marlin owners (and i'm pleased to be part of THAT group...gotta love a proper marlin) will reccomend Skinner Sights. I've browsed Skinner's page and i really like their sights but I'm really put off by the whole "we design our front sights purposefully higher so you must file them down" thing. I've never done that before and i suppose i'm worried about messing it up. Also, i don't want to have to reblue the area i file.

    I've found a nice looking, but expensive, brockman rear sight that is adjustable for elevation, but I'd rather that be a last resort.

    Really, I guess, should I go with skinner, I suppose the real question is what front sight height do i need? I have a 16 inch barrel and shoot mostly 357 mags over 38s. I'd reallllly prefer not to have to file anything myself. Also, i don't even own a file, so, there's that.

    I turn to you, possessors of wisdom!
     
  2. greyling22

    greyling22 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    4,271
    Location:
    East Texas
    you can call the guy at skinner. I did. he's nice and helpful. I ended up getting a williams 5d though. it was around 30 bucks and I figured I'd use it as a test to see if I like a peep on a marlin. I did, but now can't really see why I need to give up the williams. The skinner is sleeker, but functionally no different, and the williams gives me more adjustment.
     
  3. shrewd

    shrewd Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2011
    Messages:
    120
    Location:
    philadelphia
    i have a 2008 marlin, it is not drilled and tapped for anything that mounts on the side of the receiver.

    if only it was the decision would be so much easier.
     
  4. MGRAY

    MGRAY Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2010
    Messages:
    60
    Location:
    Illinois
    You might not need the front sight. Need to shoot it first. Mine shot high, so I purchased the 1/2" blade. Was a five minute job to install. It was to high, so I had to file it down at the range. It is mild steel and easily cut down with a standard fine cut file. I protected the barrel with a layer of duct tape. When I was satisfied with fit, I wiped it down with alcohal pad and touched up the sight with cold blue. Looks perfect now. I had installed the Skinner on a friends rifle and his stock front sight was on the money. The skinner web site has a formula to figure out your sight highth. Marty
     
  5. henschman

    henschman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,880
    Location:
    Oklahoma City
    I would go with a Williams FP. Solid, quality built, different apertures available, and click adjustable for windage and elevation... what's not to like?
     
  6. sharpshooter81

    sharpshooter81 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    48
    Location:
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    shoot it first, might not need to file anything.....I wouldnt hesitate to go with a skinner sight, besides, the guy at skinners will be more than happy to give you all the instruction you need.....cant go wrong
     
  7. Jayhawker

    Jayhawker Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2003
    Messages:
    231
    Location:
    Southwest Kansas
    +1 on the Williams FP sights.
     
  8. shiftyer1

    shiftyer1 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    Messages:
    1,644
    Location:
    central texas
    I handeled a rifle with a williams site and I liked it. You just reminded me to order one for my marlin
     
  9. Alaska444

    Alaska444 member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2010
    Messages:
    1,136
    Go with the Skinner sights. He recently sold the business to a partner, but he is still involved. I have Skinner peep sights on my Marlin .444 and my Marlin 1894c. Works well, but you may need to get a new front sight and may also need to adjust that front sight. My Marlin .444 shouts 3 inches low at 100 yards. I am going to shave off a small amount per calculations from the Skinner website. Nice looking and nice sight picture. I can put a 1.5 inch group at 100 yards. Not bad for an old man like me.

    http://www.skinnersights.com/
     
  10. slicksleeve

    slicksleeve Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2009
    Messages:
    402
    Location:
    Fort Payne, Alabama
    I have a Marlin in .444 with XS ghost ring rear, and the XS front sight that came with it. My dad has a model 1894 in .357 magnum, with the same setup. When I first mounted the XS, I looked at it and thought, that won't hit a barn, but both are very accurate. I just picked up a 39A, and I think I will go with a Skinner on it, because it looks like it is made to perfectly mount on top of the frame. I would look at the XS sight for your .357, it works great on ours. Either way, I am a firm believer now in peep sights over barrel mounted sights.
     
  11. henschman

    henschman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,880
    Location:
    Oklahoma City
    Why worry about filing down your front sight? Just get a Williams FP, and it will work fine with your factory front sight or any other front sight you want to use. I also like it because it is click-adjustable, unlike XS or Skinner sights.
     
  12. CraigC
    • Contributing Member

    CraigC Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    14,290
    Location:
    West Tennessee
    +1 on the Williams Foolproof.
     
  13. mavracer

    mavracer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    Messages:
    4,349
    Location:
    wichita
  14. squarles67

    squarles67 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2009
    Messages:
    448
    Location:
    Orange, Texas
    I have a Skinner sight on my Marlin 1895 and it works well, no changes to the front were necessary for mine.

    On my 1894 Cowboy I have a Marbles Tang sight http://www.marblearms.com/improvedPeepTang.html and I love it. Just another option you might want to look at:)
     
  15. shrewd

    shrewd Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2011
    Messages:
    120
    Location:
    philadelphia
    the tang sight doesnt interfere with your grip?


    interesting i didn't realize williams made a top receiver friendly peep...must investigate!!
     
  16. shrewd

    shrewd Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2011
    Messages:
    120
    Location:
    philadelphia
    hmm...i need a hammer extension for the williams..?
     
  17. Steel Horse Rider

    Steel Horse Rider Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    2,105
    Location:
    Loveland, Colorado
    I'll give another vote of support to the Williams FP sight. I have one on my 1894C and love it.
     
  18. mavracer

    mavracer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    Messages:
    4,349
    Location:
    wichita
    Apparently the top mount does mount the apature far enough off the back of the reciever to require the hammer extension to be installed.
     
    Last edited: Feb 20, 2012
  19. Brian Williams

    Brian Williams Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    9,834
    Location:
    Kampong Cham, Cambodia
    I have a Marble's tang sight. I do not like the looks of the Skinner and would go with either a Williams FP or a Lyman.
     
  20. squarles67

    squarles67 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2009
    Messages:
    448
    Location:
    Orange, Texas
    Not as bad as you would think, grip is different but you get used to it pretty quick.
     
  21. LeverGunJunkie

    LeverGunJunkie Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    Messages:
    242
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    XS Sights are on my Marlin 1894c .357, and my WIN MDL 94 Trapper. After having an unfortunate occurrence with a Williams sight (probably my own fault) I've gone exclusively with XS. I have zero complaints with them. They are engineered to go in pre-drilled holes on your rifle, including the front sight if required.
     
  22. stonecoldy

    stonecoldy Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2008
    Messages:
    347
    I put the Skinner Low-Pro peep sight on my Marlin 1894C, didn't need to change out the front sight, hits spot on at 50 yards with Federal 158 gr softpoints in .357 Mag. I like the Skinner sights, have them also on a 336C in .30-30, and also the Express sight on a 1895 .45-70, all Marlins.
    The Low-Pro peep is not windage adjustable, FYI but works as is for my rifle.
     
  23. WVRJ

    WVRJ Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2012
    Messages:
    246
    I put a Lyman 57 on my 1894CP.It mounted on the existing screw holes and the factory front sight was the right height.Very simple and accurate setup.
     
  24. Brian Williams

    Brian Williams Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    9,834
    Location:
    Kampong Cham, Cambodia
  25. henschman

    henschman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,880
    Location:
    Oklahoma City
    Yeah, the Lyman is excellent too, and has the same advantages of a Williams -- click adjustable windage and elevation. I forgot about it because they don't make one for my specific model (Win 94 AE).

    I find that the tang sights do indeed interfere with my grip, so I don't use them. You might want to at least shoulder a rifle that has one on it before you buy. I'm glad I did.

    And as for having to get a hammer extension, consider it a good thing, because you want the aperture as close to your eye as you can get it. That's how an aperture sight works.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page