What do people do with nice .22 LR Rifles?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
3,653
Location
Peoples Republik of New Jersey
How do people enjoy themselves with a nice .22 Rifle?

Squirrels?
Indoors at 25 yards?
Outdoors at 25, 50, 100 yards?

In other words, if you pay $500 to $1000 for a .22 rifle, what are the applications for such a rifle?
 
The use for these types of guns is to get that perfect group that you just knew you could do.

I never really thought about it before but I just realized that I would gladly pay $1000 for a .22 that I shot ALOT vs. pay that price for a gun I shot sometimes. My .22's are nothing special and most were pretty cheap but they get shot alot. Maybe it's time I get me a special one. One of them custom tailered ones:) I don't think i'll go over 650 though.
 
The same as you enjoy yourself with any other gun that costs $500 to $1000 or more. Really, it's sad to say but $1000 isn't that much to spend on a good firearm these days. Factor in the ammo costs of .22LR and why wouldn't you shoot a gun in that caliber a lot?
 
Mine was only $400 (CZ 452) ,but I have a $700 scope (Leupold 6.5 x20xx40 EFR) on it
and I enjoy bench shooting at 50 and 100 yds. I try to get to the club at least once a week.
I'm gonna start silhouette shooting when my club gets it going again.
 
I mostly shoot mine outdoors @ 50 yards at paper targets. (Browning SA-22) I don't shoot it very often (mostly I shoot pistols) but I really enjoy it when I do. And it's cheap to shoot cuz it's a .22
 
I've got a couple Anschutz rifles, one rebarreled by Karl Kenyon, a 40x, a handful of the Kimber 82Gs, as well as some older Remington's, a couple CZs, and a 10-22 with a few hundred dollars worth of parts. Some are used in indoor 50' matches, some for outdoor 25 and 50 yard matches, some just for playing around. While $500-$1000 is certainly not chump change it is relatively little money compared to other hobbies. All the money spent on the firearms themselves wouldn't cover the new motor I'm looking at to replace a worn LS2. At least with the .22s I can always shoot them regardless of my budget. Feel like spending a lot and shooting for minimal group or best score and I can splurge for tenex. Feel like plinking tin cans I can shoot federal champion or blazer, both can be found under $1.50 a box at times. I can't always justify blasting 500 rounds of even cheap .223 but a $14 brick of .22lr is something that is always an option.

People dont seem to have much issue spending $500-$1000 on a center fire and consider anything under that range to be a cheap rifle. Rimfires are no different. Quality costs money. There are a lot of nice rim fires that will kill any squirrel just fine for under $200 but if you want something that will shoot a competitive score you often find even the box stock $1000 rifle isn't quite there. Certainly in the game but not always at the top. It all comes down to what you want to do. If you need a hunting tool then a model 60 will do more than everything you need.n same with say a savage axis/edge. That's really all you need. Everything else is simply buying features and quality you want to have.
 
I dont have one anymore. I sold my last one a year or so ago, and havent gotten the cash for a replacement. I DO have a buckmark with a 9 7/8" barrel that is as accurate as most rifles lol. I shoot that at anything from 50yds out to 250ish. Most of the reason for an expensive .22 is to look good IMO, barring your serious target rifles. I want Cooper 57, but alas funds being what they are, I cant even afford a base model savage bolt gun LOL.
 
I don't really know what kind of .22LR I could sink $1000 into so I can't really comment.

With a nice $400-$500 kind of rifle like a CZ or something like that, I would probably like to take it out to 200-300 yard long-range shooting. Doesn't have to be a CZ, but the bolt-actions that seems to be reputed to be able to do this kind of shooting are in the $500 range.

With a $100 rifle I like to just go out and shoot out to 100-200 yards. I like my Marlin Model 60s for this. For closer-up plinking fun, the semi-auto is really loads of fun, so they're pretty versatile.

I kind of see .22LR as a little overkill for indoor shooting. I think finding 25 yards of indoor space would be quite a feet, and then securing it for ballistic projectiles might cost a pretty penny. Seems like it would be a more prudent investment to get a nice pellet gun for indoor shooting.

Oh, I would like to shoot in my own garage when my Model 60s manually cycling the bolt if I had some of those Aguila Super Colibri's that only have 12 fpe. Then you could have an indoor gun without going too elaborate with your backstop setup, and also use it for whatever you would also use .22 LR for.
 
How do people enjoy themselves with a nice .22 Rifle?

A .22 is my preferred woods gun. We don't have any dangerous game in the woods here, but there are plenty of small game which can be had. I've shot competitively with a .22, and really enjoyed that until my eyesight gave out. I guess, more than anything, I never outgrew the plinking stage. I still love to plink at cans or targets or whatnot. I'm fortunate I have my own land, so if I want to kill an afternoon by the pond hunting turtles and snakes, I can do that as well. The .22 can be a great purpose built gun, but IMO it's best almost as a purposeless gun. Just load up a pocket full of cartridges and go out shooting for the sake of shooting. No agenda or plan, just whatever strikes you as fun.

I'll admit I'm a bit addicted to .22s in both long and hand guns. One good gun deserves another, and they tend to multiply from there. Quality .22s are like any other quality gun, you have to respect and appreciate the craftsmanship of it. They are just as nice to handle or admire as their centerfire counterparts.

WInchesters1.jpg
 
There is nothing more fun than an inexpensive Marlin/Ruger/Whatever and a box of cheapo bulk ammo....Until you get your hands on good rifle with a good trigger and a box of better ammo that it really likes. Usually after that, you are doomed.LOL.

CZ has kind of cornered the market. They offer a very accurate, high quality rifle, that won't break the bank. Sure, they may not be an Anschutz, but they are leaps and bounds above most other sub-500 buck .22 rifles.
 
Mine was only $400 (CZ 452) ,but I have a $700 scope (Leupold 6.5 x20xx40 EFR) on it
and I enjoy bench shooting at 50 and 100 yds. I try to get to the club at least once a week.
I'm gonna start silhouette shooting when my club gets it going again.

Mine is a 452 trainer, and it's my favorite gun. So much fun to drill the 100 yd gong with the adjustable iron sights, then work the manual action. Makes me feel like I'm holding off the Nazis at Stalingrad (probably the real thing was not quite as fun though).

I also like setting up a row of empty shotgun hulls and flipping them into the air by shooting the brass bases.

What kind of groups do you get at 50 yds from the bench? The best I've been able to do was about 3" with Remington subsonic and iron sights.
 
I shoot .22 rifles because they are quiet, low cost entertainment. I also enjoy hunting rabbits and prairie dogs with them. AS far as what you'd use a "nice" .22 for....the same reasons apply, regardless of the cost of the gun. Realistically, there's not whole lot a 22 will do that a $100 pawn shop Marlin 60 can't do perfectly well. That doesn't mean CZ's, Coopers, and the like have no place. Its just that guns come at different quality and price points. While my 10/22 will kill a rabbit just as dead as a much more expensive rifle, doesn't mean theres not a niche for much fancier guns. I could hunt deer with a Savage Axis....availble for under 3 bills.....or I could hunt the same deer....in the same conditions...with a custom rifle costing 10x or more of what the Axis did. Id one right and one wrong? No...different strokes for different folks. Some people enjoy having the finiest money can buy, and theres no problems with that if they can afford their toys. On the flipside, the guy with a cheapie axis from walmart isn't doing anything
"wrong" either. Both guns are capeable of killing deer....its just a matter of taste and in some cases, economics
 
I use my Anschutz for offhand shooting practice,
and for 50' indoor matches during the winter.
But most importantly, for the Rimfire Match here at THR!!!
 
Last edited:
Mine is an old Marlin 39A that I paid $45 dollars for over 60 years ago and it's seen thusands upon thousands rounds shooting squirrel, tin cans, frogs, (for eating), paper, you name it. Still gets a lot of action. Taught my boys, who are now men, and now grandchildren on it. Great to teach finger control.

Uh uh, sorry it's not a $1000 gun. Jim

IMG_6089.gif
 
In my life I have found 22's to be the premier learning gun when it comes to learning about my self With them I have learned- I like lever action, bolt action andbreak action rifles. Autos are ok, but I don't like pumps. Scopes aint my thing. I really like revolvers. I find set triggers abominable. And a person is not unarmed with a 22.Early in my career an Anshutz full stock double set trigger 22WMR taught me that regardless of however much others drooled over it, if I really did not like it I may as well trade it for a Stevens which I did.
 
For shooting for fun, 50' 4-P matches, outdoors at 50-yards.

Marlin60Man said:
I don't really know what kind of .22LR I could sink $1000 into so I can't really comment.

I'm normally willing to go a bit overboard on most hobbies. A grand is a good chunk of change down on a nice position rifle like an Anschutz 54-actioned rifle, or a Walther KK-200 or 300. It might be most of the asking price of an older Winchester 52 or Remington .22 target rifle.

Mostly I think $500-1000 will buy a very nice, quality sporter rifle that will be a pleasure to own and shoot for many years. I've never understood why people want the guns they shoot the most (.22s) to be the cheapest ones they own. It's one place where I think many shooters get the wrong impression of the cartridge due to the inexpensive firearms they normally use them in. How many times have you ever heard "It's just a .22", as though it justifies either breaking cheap parts, indifferent accuracy with "just .22 ammo" or so-so reliability in an auto-loader (usually with "just .22" ammo...)?

(Me, I'm holding out until I have the cash for an Anschutz. Because if I ever stop shooting Highpower I think 3-P smallbore will help occupy my time.)
 
I've posted dozens of times that the "lowly" .22LR is my all-time favorite cartridge. I agree that there is not much difference between many $100.00 .22LRs, and many $1,000.00 .22LRs.

Among my most accurate-ever .22s is my current Savage Mark II. With a 4X Leupold scope, and a BLK mount/ring. This rifle quite handily groups in the range of 1" to 1.5" at 100 yards. That isn't bad for a rifle that cost me about $169.00.

I have used .22LRs to plink steel, assault cans, mystify crows who otherwise thought themselves safe, and effect 1-shot-kills through woodchucks' necks out to 175 yards. Oddly enough, that was all done with some of my less expensive .22LRs as well as some of my most expensive. I'm not convinced that price is the most significant factor.

Cool thread OP!! Thanks for starting it.

Geno
 
When I saw the thread title, I wondered if this was a trick question.

Basically, all the joys of shooting in a relatively quiet, mild recoiling, and inexpensive to feed package. Hunt, target shoot, plink ... all can be handled by the "lowly" .22.
 
For me the fun isn't so much the actual shooting of the rifle, but rather me spending time with my dad in the great outdoors(he's 68). I was never really into any of those other father-son outdoor activities such as fishing or hunting, though I did love to crab(one of the only things that I'll eat that I can catch).
 
What kind of groups do you get at 50 yds from the bench?

Mine is a Trainer also, but I don't shoot for groups much.
I like to shoot these targets from rimfire central (which you should visit).
Not great but it sure makes me feel good when I get a decent results.

50ydBRtarget-2131.jpg

Edit; BTW- You should try some better ammo. CCI SV is not too expensive but shoots well in my Trainer. That target was shot with Wolf MT.
 
Last edited:
A 91 is a pretty darn good score with an a sporter weight, out-of-the box gun. I've seen lots of guys throw a pile of cash at a dedicated bench gun that won't do any better.
 
Everybody’s priorities and budget are different. I’ve got about $4500 tied up in this Ballard Low-Wall in .22LR, and had a similar discussion with the gentleman that put it together for me. For some reason folks will drop serious money on a centerfire without blinking an eye, but will balk when buying a .22. The work, and materials involved are virtually the same.

It was built to mirror one of my High-Wall silhouette rifles, down to the presentation grade wood, hand checkering, and hand rubbed finish. It was my gift to me, from me, when I retired from the Army. I use it for off-hand and BPCR silhouette practice.

DSC00013.gif
DSC00014.gif
DSC00012.jpg

Chuck
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top