Duramaximum
Member
Hey guys! I'm new to the site and figured I would ask you folks the same question I have asked everyone else and gotten seperate answers from. I want a strong handgun for carrying with me in the woods and for range shooting. I live up here in western Montana which is grizzly and mountain lion country. I was originally going to buy the new Ruger P345 .45 Auto for a backup weapon, but a guy I worked with (who is an absolute gun junky, his guns are his children) said to nix the auto for a backup in the woods. His words, "If you pull the trigger on an automatic and nothing happens, your screwed. If you pull the trigger on a revolver and nothing happens, pull it again!"This was logic I could understand. I told him I wanted to get a .480 Ruger later, but he said just get a .44 Magnum; it'll kill anything that walks this continent and is a more versitile cartridge. Okay, why not. I was at the gunsmith a week ago and I asked him to price a Ruger Super Redhawk in .44 Mag with the 7 1/2" barrel, and we got to talking about what I would be doing with it and he said he wasn't a big fan of the .44 Mag. He said .454 Casull is more worth my while; I'll blow holes in whatever I blast with it. The only thing I have heard about this cartridge is that it is a powerhouse but kicks like a mule. He would prefer a .41 Mag over the .44 Mag because it has better velocity, or something like that. Hence, there inlies the problem. I'm a little confused at this point. I have shot the .44 in SRH and handled it no problem and have shot all sorts of automatics from .22 to .45 and am a pretty good shot. I am partial to Ruger and size and weight are of little concern to me (I have no use for a 9 inch barrel though.) I have nothing against S&W but they are really proud of their firearms. Let me know what you think. Thanks!
Last edited: