FenderTK421
Member
I don't get you guys. My .380 lcp may be a pos but the recoil is nada (it just tries to squirm around). My snub nose .454 is something else, but I love it to death; of course it takes a few hundred rounds to get to know you.
The wood grips on the P-64 don't increase its width or handle length. They only add a hump at the rear to make it fit your hand better. It has no effect on concealment whatsoever as the overall profile of the gun does not change. Get Marschal grips. You won't be sorry. I've got them on my Makarov and P-64. My father also has them on his P-64.Both the pa-63 and the p-64 are kicky. I just yesterday got my wolf springs for them both. The p-64 was worst but still within limits. I did manage to dent my thumb knuckle with my hi-cap makarov, and that guns kicks pretty good,too. The guy who suggested the bigger grips has a good idea but it might compromise the small size of the p-64 and hence it's best feature.
I can imagine. A guy at my club had one that he let me shoot. I shot a few rounds of .38 +P, and then he asked me if I wanted to try some .357 in it. I declined his gracious offer.My S&W 340PD with full house .357 mag loads is quite painful.
Due to wrist injuries (both wrists crushed in a road accident) I'm very sensitive to handgun recoil. But after trying to stick with .22s and other very low recoil pistols, I found (by just trying it) that I can shoot an S&W XVR revolver .460 Magnum.I actually like shooting the X-frame .460 Magnum and .500 Magnums from the 8 3/4" barrels whenever I get the time (neither are mine). I reload the .460 for a buddy who provides the materials. In return, I'm welcome borrow the beast whenever I feel the need for something "blasty".
The bark/blast to recoil ratio on either isn't too bad, IMO. In a shorter, lighter platform without the benefit of a brake, I'm sure that would change pretty quick.