What percentage of your guns are "synthetic"?

Status
Not open for further replies.
What percentage of your guns are "synthetic"?

They are all "synthetic", non of them are "organic". (LOL) Steel does not exist in nature, iron does.

Now how many have non-wood stocks, 4. Wood stocks, 4. Laminate stocks 2. Stainless barrels 2 the rest are blued.

Hope that answers your question.
Jim
 
If there were a good reason to continue making guns using wooden stocks, we would not have seen every law enforcement agency and military unit switch to synthetic stocks, "after all that's what we are speaking to. Other than pistols. All seem to be in agreement that the synthetic material requires less work, is more resistant to weather and holds up forever. Wood will chip dent and rot if not taken care of. My most beautiful guns were nickel or stainless and wood with Burled wood grips etc. But they are not practical for heavy constant use without too much maintenance, more for show or for occasions where you won't be crawling around in the mud. these new era guns are made to take a beating, get thrown out of vechicles and generally beat to crap, while still continuing to work. IE: Glock, M&P etc. Barbcue guns are nice, I would still have 1 around if I got the bug again, but I don't want to worry where I lay my gun down, to prevent scratching a delicate finish, as I did when I was a young man. Same reason AR's are made the way they are, wood, would just not hold up, same with shotguns, great for skeet or trap, even Birds, but not combat shotguns with tac lights and lasers on them.
 
after 10 years of slowly selling off my blued guns now 80% of mine are synthetic and SS models.
Same with my handguns. Sold my blued ones and replaced with SS models. The ones I still have that are blued will be sent off for matte hard chroming, and all of them that synthetic stocks are offered for I have already changed over.
 
Handguns and rifles, roughly 50% blued and 50% stainless barrels.

Only one has a synthetic stock (the Ruger 77/44).
 
2 out of 76 of my firearms have plastic stocks and none are stainless.
my ar and one of my mosins has a plastic stock, the plastic stock on the mosin will be replaced with wood eventualy.
i have a realy nice ss .416 bore octagon barrel i got real cheap but i just cant make myself put it in the lathe and thread it for any of my project rifles. if it was blued it would have been used a long time ago.

a wise man, who just happens to be a stockmaker once said "life is to short to hunt with a ugly gun" and he was right.
i would have no problem carrying a rifle with a $2000+ stock in the woods, but i do have a problem carrying a ugly synthetic reguardless of the price.
 
I own 27 long guns which are 'blued with wood'.
I only own 1 long gun with a synthetic stock: .22 Henry Survival rifle.

Handguns are different matter entirely however.
.
 
My first handgun was a synthetic (SR9 Compact), but I only owned it for 6 months before trading it in for the Ruger SR1911.

I was going to buy the new Ruger 357/77, but since the stock was synthetic, I ultimately decided to pass.

Case in point, I understand why Synthetics would be important to some people (examples: less effected by heat/warping in rifles, lighter for CC), but I've just gotta have metal in my hand. Not sure why, but it feels right :D
 
"If there were a good reason to continue making guns using wooden stocks, we would not have seen every law enforcement agency and military unit switch to synthetic stocks, "after all that's what we are speaking to."


Using your line of reasoning, there's no good reason for making cars with leather seats because law enforcement and the military both use synthetic/vinyl.

Both wooden stocks and leather seats possess attributes that their less expensive replacements can't duplicate. I guess you don't value these characteristics, but I don't see how you can ignore their existence.
 
My addiction to military surplus really skews that percentage, but I'd say I have only two non-wood based rifles. One Tikka T3 and a Vz.58 (technically the furniture is NOT wood)

I have every intention of buying a synth/stainless combo, but I haven't decided which caliber yet. I imagine my first AR15 purchase (eventually) would be another.
 
None of mine are the metal-and-wood. I have a few polymer pistols, a couple synthetic shotguns, and a stainless revolver.
 
After 100% of the wood stocked guns i bought had hidden cracks in them, i decided to never buy wood stocks again

However that does not mean i can not enjoy the fine wood on dads Tikka
If i can, i will put a McMillan frn stock on it though

Oh, uh, forgot to insert procent

75%
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure on the percentage (2%?) but only one handgun out of all - a P22.
Less in long guns and at that only because I really like GI "glass" stocks on an M-14 though I do still have a Garand synth stock incase I ever want to hunt with one again.
Mossberg 590 too.
 
22% of rifles have synthetic stock, 3.7% are stainless and 0% are stainless and synthetic.
0% of shotguns all Blue and wood.
Handguns 6% poly frame and 22% stainless.
 
I was going to say 0%, but I just remembered a friend recently gave me a Mossberg 12ga pump that has a plastic stock.
All of my other guns are wood/blued steel and I would never buy a gun with stainless steel or a synthetic stock. Just an aesthetic thing.
 
80% are stainless, polymer, plastic, or some combination thereof. I have several stainless actions in wood furniture and blued with plastic stocks.

Of the last 15 I've bought, only 1 blued/wood in the bunch. I've been buying utilitarian.
 
Very few, of 80 or so guns, only two rifles (AR and 10/22) and two pistols (XD .45 and Bodyguard .380) which comes out to 5%. Basically strict utilitarian guns. Most everything else is blued steel, walnut, maple, holly, cocobolo, ivory, stag, etc.. I don't really put a stainless single action with wood grips or a blued sixgun with checkered hard rubbers in the same ballpark as a stainless/synthetic rifle. Just not my thang. :barf:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top