vanilla gorilla said:If you will read my whole post, you will note that I said nothing about filling in the dispatcher on everything that happened.
From your original post...
vanilla gorilla said:Were it me making the call, I'd first provide my address and name, and that somebody has attacked me. "I pulled my weapon and fired to defend myself, and have now retreated to a safe area."
And what exactly will that add to the information relayed to the Police if indeed it is relayed verbatim?
And what if, in the excitement, that sentence comes out as "I shot the F&^%$#@ B*&^%$# with my .357 Mag and I can stick my F*&^%$# Fist into the exit wounds. Wow did those puppies ever open up nice! I'm hiding behind my F*&^%$# Sofa." Let this get played with commentary and it may sound like you were just waiting to ambush someone with your "killer toy". How do you KNOW what you will say in such an emotionally charged situation? The point is that you DON'T know what you will say or how you will say it. That is why saying a practised minimum is best.
vanilla gorilla said:If they start asking too many questions about exactly what happened, a lot of "I don't know." or "I'm not sure." is the rule.
Which is exactly what you don't want... in the excitement you will want to tell all... and get re-assurance. But since you don't know what you will say or that you won't say something when you meant it entirely different - getting into a conversation is not a good idea... how do you know when to stop when you may not be thinking rationally?
(Actually, you agree with my position when you say that... )
Also... starting your post with "I must admit, I've heard stupid things said in my life, and this is pretty far up on the list" is not a good (THR) way to respond. My post comes from a well thought out, researched and substantiated position.
You may not agree with it - as you obviously don't. But then opinions are like ...emmmm noses.... everybody has one.