fjolnirsson
Member
I like to go hiking in the forests near my home. We have cougar and black bear, among other things, roaming these same forests. While I would like to have a 44mag or 454(10mm, .50, etc) at some point, the funds are not there at the moment. So, my question is, of the three handguns available to me, which should I carry while hiking for last chance defense against bears? Obviously, my first choice is avoidance. However, I would like to at least bloody the darn things nose if I'm gonna be eaten.
So, I currently own a .44 special, a .45 acp, and a .40 s&w. Taking a quick look at the Speer ballistics chart online(my book is in the car with my wife, who is at work), it seems the three are all within the same range as far as muzzle velocity is concerned. That being 900-1000 fps, with a 200 grain bullet.
So, for all you knowledgeable folk, which is my best bet? Seeing as how a bear has that thick skull, would FMJ ammo give any significant advantage in any of these calibers? Am I better off with a sharpened stick? Would a lighter or heavier bullet in any of these calibers be better?
I'd love to carry my 870, but that could get me hauled in for poaching, I'm afraid. Best to keep something concealed.
So, I currently own a .44 special, a .45 acp, and a .40 s&w. Taking a quick look at the Speer ballistics chart online(my book is in the car with my wife, who is at work), it seems the three are all within the same range as far as muzzle velocity is concerned. That being 900-1000 fps, with a 200 grain bullet.
So, for all you knowledgeable folk, which is my best bet? Seeing as how a bear has that thick skull, would FMJ ammo give any significant advantage in any of these calibers? Am I better off with a sharpened stick? Would a lighter or heavier bullet in any of these calibers be better?
I'd love to carry my 870, but that could get me hauled in for poaching, I'm afraid. Best to keep something concealed.