Which pocket pistol shoots best?

Status
Not open for further replies.

texas chase

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2006
Messages
309
Location
Central Texas
from this selection:

1. Bersa Thunder 380 Concealed Carry

2. Kel-Tec P-11

3. Kel-Tec PF-9

This forum usually produces great advice/info. I welcom all responses but please keep in mind - I only want info on these 3 pistols. No others. Please don't tell me about you pocket wheel gun (which I like very much) or tell me to save up for something else. These are the pistols that I've narrowed my search down to and I'm looking for info on these only. With that said, thanks in advance for all responses.

Any info on these guns will be appreciated but I'm particularly looking for how they shoot - how's the recoil, how does it fit in your hand (I have relatively small hands), how accurate are they? Thanks again.
 
I think that all three are a bit big to be true "pocket pistols"

The Bersa Thunder .380 CC is noticeably smaller than the regular Thunder and is 5 oz lighter. It pocket carries very well. I have it in a Galco pocket protector holster in the front pocket of my jeans right now. It also rides comfortably in the front pocket of most of my shorts without printing. Khakis are a mixed bag, but only because of issues with the way some of the pockets are shaped, not the size of the gun.

I have not shot the other two pistols. The only Kel-Tec I shot was a P-3AT, which I did not like. I dry-fired a P-11 and hated the trigger. I have not been able to get my hands on a PF-9 yet, but I've heard the trigger is similar to the P-3AT. The P-3AT has a decent trigger. My dislike for it had more to do with its tiny proportions and low weight making it unpleasant to shoot. If I were looking at a Kel-Tec, it would definitely be the PF-9.

My big gripe with the Thunder CC is the low-profile sights, which I hate. They are fine for defensive shooting, but a challenge at the range. I have no trouble hitting an 8 inch target at 45 feet, but it usually takes a few rounds to zero in on the center. The shots group within a couple inches, once I make adjustments. There is definitely some muzzle-flip, but nothing good off-hand position can't easily compensate for. Overall, I really like the gun. I've put around 600 rounds through it and my only failures were during the first hundred or two. The last 400 rounds have been 100 percent flawless.
 
I dunno about which shoots best in your hands, but the way I see it: Why settle for a Bersa in .380 when you can carry a 9mm. That narrows it doen to the KTs. The PF9 has yet to prove itself reliable. I've heard alot of complaints about it here on THR. That leaves you with the P-11. Yes the trigger could be a lot better, but compared to the DA of a wheel gun it really isn't that much worse. Its long and its hard but it can be mastered. I say out of the 3 choices given go with the P-11.
 
Of the three pistols you asked about the only one I have personal experience with is the KelTec P11.

I've had my P11 for several years, and it has always been 100% reliable, and reasonably accurate at self defense range. The trigger sucks, but I like a heavy da first round in my cc firearm to preclude ad/nd's, so I can live with that.

I was planning to buy a PF-9, had the money all saved up. Then when they released them they are more problemmatic than Britney Spears... I don't know if the later models have the problems corrected, but I don't want one anymore. I think the KT platforms that are the most reliable historically are the P11 and P32, and I have one of each of those.

I read on the www.Bersatalk.com forum a lot, and it seems the Bersa Thunder 380 is a great little pistol. I have the Firestorm FS22, which is basically the standard BT380, but in 22cal. It is very accurate, and has been 100% reliable. I also have the larger BT9/UC in 9mm, and it has been very accurate and 100% reliable. It is my opinion that the Bersa/Firestorm line of firearms are tremendous values, and someone at the home office of B/F in Argentina should be fired for not marketing these excellent pistols better in the U.S.

Bersa/Firestorm and Walther must use the same public relations firm for their NON-advertising campaign in the U.S.

My next firearms purchase will probably be the BT380 CC model. I certainly don't need a 380cal. anything, but I like the looks of the CC BT380, and from what I read it is the perfect carry weapon for the little lady.. I have a little lady who just might like one of the suckers, and since the price is very reasonable I think I'll pick up one. I know the small sights have been criticized, but I do ALL of my shooting from self defense range (in my mind, 0-7 yards), and from that distance small sights should be no problem.

I never try for a sight picture at that distance anyway, as I always keep my eyes on the target, I don't try to acquire a fanatastic sight picture. If you can't point/shoot center mass of a person sized target at 7' or less with a pistol/revolver without needing a perfect sight picture you should be carrying a shotgun..

Which by the way is never a bad idea... ;)

I'm an old fart, and my personal opinion is that MY KelTec P11 has been a fine little pistol.. I would avoid the new PF-9 like the plague, and you can't go wrong with a Bersa anything, and the BT380 as long as you are willing to accept the reduced caliber... I think you would find in the long run the Bersa Thunder 380 would be likely to be the more reliable of the three choices, and quality CorBon or other modern self defense designed 380 ammo is pretty good stuff.

Or, you never seem to read negatives about the KelTec P11's or P32's, but the P3AT and the PF-9's seem to have problems.

I don't do "fluff 'n buff" and I don't want to send my pistol back for free warranty repair 3 times to get a reliable firearm. I want my pistol to function perfectly right out of the box (my P11 & P32 have done so) and it seems KelTecs can be very good, or very bad, and it's a crap shoot as to which you wind up with.

The Bersa Thunder 380 has an excellent reputation for accuracy and reliability and the only negatives you ever read about them are the high cost of extra factory magazines.

In my doteage I have come to appreciate above all things in my cc firearm RELIABILITY... Period. I think a BT380 would come the closest to offering that reliability among the three pistols you are asking about.


All this is just old fart opinion.. I've had firearms for over 50 years, and I'm pretty much formed my opinions based on personal experience. I could be wrong, and dissenting opinions welcomed, and cheerfully ignored. :D

Best Wishes,

J. Pomeroy
 
Of your selection, I would use the Bersa Thunder 380 CC.

Well enough made, well enough designed.
My hands are not small so felt recoil and how it fits would
not be the same.

How accurate most pocket guns are is different for each person
and each gun of the same make and model.




Tinker2
 
I've only shot the Bersa. I love mine, have many many rounds through it and carry it often.

That said, it's hard to call it a pocket pistol in my opinion. I bought a P3AT for true pocket carry. I could never get the Bersa out of my pocket with any speed and consistency at all.
 
I've had a P11 for a couple years now.Very reliable. Probably about 700 rds through it with no problems. Never tried the Bersa or the PF9 and don't really care too.
Yea --the trigger on the P11 is nasty but that is also part of AD avoidance. Not a range gun by any stretch--it is a SD weapon and it serves that purpose well.
Sometimes it's a little too big for pocket carry though so I also like the P3AT also.
My first one made 1 trip back to the factory and all they did was the infamous "fluff and buff" and it has been 100% reliable ever since. I like and carry the P3AT so much that I got another one last week. Guys wife only put 50 rds through it --did not like it so I got it for a decent price.
I cleaned it and did the F & B myself. Took it to the range yesterday. 1 FTE out of 75 shots of American Eagle and flawless with 20 rds of Speer Gold dots.
It's a keeper
 
My only experience is with the P-11.
I was asked to test and evaluate the P-11 many years ago and kept the gun.

No Fluff and Buff.

Gunsmith did take it all apart, as we wanted to see what this gun was all about.
Factory preservative removed from gun, magazines, put everything back together, lubed and "see if you can tear it up" were the instructions to myself and another gentleman.
This other fellow had started shooting his about a week before I did. He was already at a round count ~ 1500 rds with no problems when I got mine he was doing the "scoop powder, stick a bullet in it, and shoot" portion of his T&E.

Just a plastic double action revolver that feeds from a magazine designed to go bang, and be used for defensive distances, is all the P-11 is.

I learned to shoot with revolvers and still believe learning to shoot a revolver in double action only makes one a better shooter - even if they choose another platform later on.

My P-11 is still running, never failed to and the trigger has smoothed up since mine has over 20K rds through it. I quit counting then...

This fits a niche for me and others, hence the reason I/we call the P-11 our "niche gun".
I am a wood and blue person, and I prefer simple and bone stock. I am big into to gun fit.
Extensions for the Pinkie onto the factory magazine are the only accessory I have on some magazines, and the only accessory I recommend.

Concealing is easier without this extension, as are spare magazines.
I have not busted one of these extensions, as one thing I do know from testing, evaluating, personally, plus just having been around long enough, observed and all is - extensions if dropped, banged hit - can and will leave sharp edges, and say for instance one were to strike with enough force these extensions, the magazine can be rendered useless.

I have done this with other magazines with pinkie extensions/ extensions for wanting to know by replicating defensive and serious situations.

My druthers, I would recommend a steel or steel and aluminum alloy J frame, Detective Special and K frame snubby for "Pocket/Always" gun.
Truth is, some folks are right partial to the Police Trade-Ins they have, these Older guns are such, some are setting them back, preserving them and wanting an alternative.

Kel-Tec comes to mind, especially with the price being less than a new wheel gun, and the 9mm ammunition is so affordable to allow lots of quality practice.

Hopefully one will never have to use a firearm in a defensive situation , still the reality is, if one does, the possibility of a electric engraver putting an evidence number on the slide, and not being cared for while awaiting for Grand Jury, Jury Trial - whatever - some I know would prefer a P-11 to be treated in this manner over a classic Model 36, 37, Detective Special...etc.

Ease of take-down with no tools.

No secret I am bone stock Gov't Model of 1911 person. I mean I feel when kid enters first grade, after the big fat pencil, Big Chief notebook, they should be given a bone stock Gov't Model to have and learn to take apart, put back and this would be part of the thinking, dexterity and fun time. Nothing wrong with Play-Doh, just Play-Doh does not go "bang" very well.

Here is the deal, some folks travel and use legal , secure , lockable containers as required by various jurisdictions. If such jurisdiction requires the firearm be "apart" , it takes about 3 seconds to break down a P-11 with no tools.

Personally again.

I only shoot revolvers, or Single Action semi-automatics - 1911/BHPs.
I found MY personal guns that fit me when I was a brat, and stayed with these platforms.
Additionally, I want my brain, and muscle memory to do the same thing each time - especially under stress, tired, not awake, sleep depraved, scared - stressed.

P-11 is a plastic double action only revolver, and just like I do with a revolver, I sweep off the "safety". Yeah I know the revolver and P-11 does not have one, just from trigger time and years with 1911 my thumb has this action ingrained. My thumb, or if shooting weak handed with a bone stock 1911 ( as I do not do ambi safeties) my thumb / weak index finger goes "down" .

Repetition becomes habit - habit becomes faith.

For me, this was a new gun, made of plastic, asked to T&E for reasons, and so me being me - put in the trigger time.

No big deal to run at least 200 rds a day, even as much as 1k a day. Tested all the mags.

First - Reliable with all the mags.
Second - POA/POI of ammunition with the sights.

Shot Placement : Gun has to feed, extract, feed, extract - repeat.

Nice if the ammunition and sights work together.

Shot Placement is paramount, so First Criteria is paramount with Second being a real good idea.

The 3 white dots drove me nuts for the sight system. See I have shot a shotgun a few times, and shotguns are pointed, not aimed.
I learned to shoot shotguns without beads.
Plain bead on front, or even with a mid-bead does not bother me - and if one falls off, I do not care - as I do not need it/them anyway.
Hi-Vis and other sights on a shotgun distracts me.

Plain sights on handguns, factory, gold bead front, whatever - just plain sights.
I used a number 2 pencil to darken the dots on my P-11.
One other gun being tested - just took the damn sights off on purpose.
"Poor man's ASP" [See Theodore Roosevelt].

Once the initial shooting, testing mags, getting used to thing was done on Day 2 - I went onto "test, evaluate and try to tear it up"

Cases ammunition, my personal magazines marked, and about 15 spare mags, and shoot I did.

In a week I was doing from conceal to target in 1.0 sec ( and sometimes less, my best IIRC was .7) and getting all 10 shots into a playing card out to 5yds.
I start at "bad breath" and go out in distance.

About 2 weeks later gunsmith buddy that asked me test this thing, come out to the Private Range where I was with more ammunition, and lunch.
"What the hell are you shooting the steels with?" - he asked
I was ringing 6" and 8" steels at 45 yards.

I needed a change of target and the new black paint just looked plumb wrong on them steels...

I have taken ground hogs, pests, varmins , rabbits and even some big squirrels that were dumb enough to sit there on a cross tie at 15 yards during season.
FWIW Blazer aluminum 115 gr FMJ will work on squirrels though I will admit I was going for the eye and shot a tad higher...

So this gun was "approved" and implemented for ladies and gents to carry. Other folks put nice guns in safes, and started using these P-11s.
I was ask to assist new folks in learning this gun.

Since I had shot this gun enough, including low/ no light situations, I just left the white dots white as this is how the guns come and figured with assisting students, just lead by example and keep it simple.

One person, with some special needs due to eyes, we did "modify" his front sight. He has a Hi-Vis green "insert" in his front sight. Works real nice, and all these years has held up.
He has a spare made up, along with spare factory sights. Once some eye surgery was done - eyes better than ever, he..."I'm keeping the green as I like it and maybe the wife can tell our P-11s apart" *joke*

Now early on when I ordered the spare magazines, and pinkie extensions, I asked the nice folks about spare parts, and that I was testing and evaluating one, and I was just one that liked the idea of having spare parts either for me, or students.
Extra recoil springs, plastic guide rod, the "plug" ( I call it) that inserts into gun, into lower part of barrel, firing pins and Allen screws.

Mine is still using original parts.

Oh I stuck these parts in tried them, they worked, and set them back putting original parts back in.

I concern myself with chamber, extraction - so this is what I "clean". Rack slide, use a bent rod to fit into chamber , toothbrush/ pipe cleaner for extractor and face, if I choose to lube, drop either back of slide rails, where the hammer rides, or either side of breech where rails are.
My quickie range clean.
Mine has easily gone 1k rounds without any cleaning, or lubing.
I have run it up ~ 3k rds with no cleaning or lubing.

I say I would not buy another, as I really do prefer a steel gun, steel aluminum gun, Prefer 1911 , BHP, K frames or J frames.

Mine fills a niche, and has done so very well. I have CCW-ed two at a time, lots of times.
I had a second one given to me, and someone really needed a CCW pronto, and I let that one go.
If given another(s) I'd keep them, they fill a niche for me and others.

Out and about on farms, ranches, and in "property vehicles" including boats that check reservoirs - the nice guns have been removed and replaced with P-11s.
Electrical tape and some engineering makes for a nice lanyard for water use...

Cows, "the old gray mare", Coup-de-grace on deer, pigs for "hog killing time", rabid dogs, raccoons, and other such uses these P-11s have seen.

Just a plastic double action revolver , that feed from the bottom and does not cost a lot is all these are...

...nothing more, nothing less...
 
I've owned 4 KT pistols. A P40 (with the .40 and .357 barrels), a P11, a first gen P32 and a 2nd gen P3AT (which is the only one I still have ).

My personal experience with the KT's has been mixed. First off, they're a great company to deal with. But my experience with their pistols has been that NO model has been proven completely reliable or completely unreliable. One can only look at individual guns as you can have two identical KTs side by side and one is flawless and the other is a mess.

My P32 never skipped a beat, but a friends was terrible. I don't really like the 32 cartridge so I gave the gun to my SO who won't carry anything larger or more powerful. At least I know it's reliable.

My P40 wasn't bad, but also wasn't reliable enough to use as an SD gun, even after a thorough F&B and a return to the factory I just never felt comfortable carrying it. Besides the occasional FTF, even with FMJ or PowRballs, it would occasionally drop the mag out unexpectedly and it would often hit me in the face with ejected empties.

The P11 was reliable until it would break a part, sometimes a trigger, sometimes a spring or the mag release. It did this on a regular basis, I can't think of a time when it went through more than a few hundred rounds without something breaking or falling apart.

As of right now the P3AT can't make it through 2 mags of FMJ's without a FTF. It's only got a few hundred rounds on it (and strangely enough it's getting worse instead of better), I'm going to do the F&B soon and hope that fixes it. If not it will go the way of the P40 and P11.

So far I've yet to find a pocket auto in a respectable caliber that's reliable enough for SD use and I've had a bunch. BUG use is another matter, but only if the BUG is accompanied by a more reliable piece.

In fact I've never found an auto smaller than a Glock 26 or Smith 3913, both too big/heavy for every day pocket carry, that I'd deem reliable enough to bet my life on. And that includes Kahr's polymer models. By this I mean any model of a specific gun. In other words, go down the the store, buy one and KNOW you're getting a reliable piece. I prove every SD gun I use, but I don't have the time or the desire to go through a half dozen P3AT's to find one that works right nor do I have the patience to keep sending them back. Or the ammo money to waste breaking them in and trying to prove them.

Sorry KT, I love you guys and I love the idea behind your guns, but they need to work properly right out of the box. Up the price by 25%, make the parts slightly beefier, do the F&B at the factory and test fire each one to make sure it will cycle properly and you'll still undercut Kahr by $200.
 
I've owned KT pistols. A P40 (with the .40 and .357 barrels), a P11, a first gen P32 and a 2nd gen P3AT (which is the only one I still have ).

My personal experience with the KT's has been mixed. First off, they're a great company to deal with. But my experience with their pistols has been that NO model has been proven completely reliable or completely unreliable. One can only look at individual guns as you can have two identical KTs side by side and one is flawless and the other is a mess.

My P32 never skipped a beat, but a friends was terrible. I don't really like the 32 cartridge so I gave the gun to my SO who won't carry anything larger or more powerful. At least I know it's reliable.

My P40 wasn't bad, but also wasn't reliable enough to use as an SD gun, even after a thorough F&B and a return to the factory I just never felt comfortable carrying it. Besides the occasional FTF, even with FMJ or PowRballs, it would occasionally drop the mag out unexpectedly and it would often hit me in the face with ejected empties.

The P11 was reliable until it would break a part, sometimes a trigger, sometimes a spring or the mag release. It did this on a regular basis, I can't think of a time when it went through more than a few hundred rounds without something breaking or falling apart.

As of right now the P3AT can't make it through 2 mags of FMJ's without a FTF. It's only got a few hundred rounds on it (and strangely enough it's getting worse instead of better), I'm going to do the F&B soon and hope that fixes it. If not it will go the way of the P40 and P11.

So far I've yet to find a pocket auto in a respectable caliber that's reliable enough for SD use and I've had a bunch. BUG use is another matter, but only if the BUG is accompanied by a more reliable piece.

In fact I've never found an auto smaller than a Glock 26 or Smith 3913, both too big/heavy for every day pocket carry, that I'd deem reliable enough to bet my life on. And that includes Kahr's polymer models. By this I mean any model of a specific gun. In other words, go down the the store, buy one and KNOW you're getting a reliable piece. I prove every SD gun I use, but I don't have the time or the desire to go through a half dozen P3AT's to find one that works right nor do I have the patience to keep sending them back. Or the ammo money to waste breaking them in and trying to prove them.

Sorry KT, I love you guys and I love the idea behind your guns, but they need to work properly right out of the box. Up the price by 25%, make the parts slightly beefier, do the F&B at the factory and test fire each one to make sure it will cycle properly and you'll still undercut Kahr by $200.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top