Don't understand the BHP comments...
...I have a CZ-75B and a CZ-75 Transitional (no firing pin block, but has the wider mag' well like the 75-B's).
I enjoy both, but I wouldn't consider them a BHP equivalent or vice versa.
A BHP is a BHP a CZ-75B is inspired by a BHP...not the same piece.
I have an Arcus (very much a BHP clone)...the operational controls are different, the ergonomics are different, the trigger is different.
Mr. Camp has good information on both BHP's and CZ-75's, as well as a good report on the CZ-83.
http://www.hipowersandhandguns.com/
Both mine have terrific triggers...my CZ-75B is my "alpha-autoloader". I can hit what I aim at with it and have become very comfortable with its operational "nuances". I find it to be a very "forgiving" piece. My technique doesn't have to be perfect to get satisfactory results. My Glocks, on the other hand, require a precise intersection of all the required elements to get the results I'm after (which can also be useful when working out the kinks of something I may be doing wrong during practice).
Some find the safety and slide release controls of the CZ line uncomfortable, especially when compared to a 1911's.
I added Hogue FG grips to both and they fit me very well. They won't fit every hand and not everyone will get similar results.
If you don't have a CZ, you owe yourself the chance to check one out. If you tried it and don't care for it, that's fine too.
Since I have two CZ's...what I need, is a BHP Practical...but that's another story...
.
Safe shooting,
CZ52'