Who here is not a Republican or a Conservative?

Status
Not open for further replies.
None of the above.

I used to call myself libertarian, but I kept seeing articles saying libertarians must be for this and against that... most of which is wildly impractical. I judge each issue separately for the most part, and I accept that you have to make compromises to practicality.

I like the sound of "minarchist", but I'll probably find that someone has defined that too specificly as well.
 
It really depends upon which day you ask me, whether I believe government is a necessary evil, or just an evil.

After this last election I decided I would never again throw away my vote on a Republican.

pax

The two major political parties can be summed up this way: There are two parties, one is the Stupid Party and the other is the Evil Party. Occasionally these two parties create legislation that is both stupid and evil. This is called bi-partisianship. -- Andrew Grooms
 
I'm a long-haired, wild-eyed, bomb-tossing, gold-plated anarchist.

Well, I don't actually toss bombs, not anymore. And my hair isn't particularly long. But the description helps get the point across...

Ya ain't gold-plated, neither.
 
I consider myself a conserative,but I support an open border and I given money to several latino foundations.
 
Registered Democrat here. That being said, I vote my conscience. Vote for the person, not for the party.
 
I won't be boxed...

The least amount of governmental interference in our lives, the better.

The government has no business...
In the war on drugs.
In choices concerning reproductive issues.
In the regulation of any of the so called vices.
In madating quotas, minimums or set asides in job availabilty.
In taxing people for services they don't use.
In the general redistribution of wealth.
In establishing and enforcing laws not specifically enumerated in the Constitution.

The business of government is to treat with other nations and to defend our borders from those who wish to enter illegally and/or do us harm.
 
Just fer grins, grab a copy of The Moon is A Harsh Mistress/RH & take a look at Prof. La Paz' (the name IIRC) definition of rational anarchism (part of a discussion).

Fits plenty well for me & allows me to be "slippery" any time I want. ;)

" .... won't be boxed" works plenty good.

Although I believe some basics rules/social lubrication are necessary, I do shake my head at the extremes we go to make sure we're suitably oiled.
 
Somewhere between Libertarian For Life and Constitution Party for me.

For me, "reproductive choice" is about choosing whether or not to fertilize, not whether or not to kill an innocent human being. In the sad case of rape, the unborn child is still innocent. If the mother's life in endangered, of course, she may choose to defend herself by killing her unborn child.

Speaking as a former "unwanted child."
 
I claim to be a staunch Conservative, that is to say that the less government interference in my daily life, the better.

Exactly. I’m pro-Bill of Rights and pro-do what you like as long as it doesn’t harm anyone. I’m also pro-free market capitalism, so that makes me a “right-wingerâ€, but I’m certainly not a Republican sheep, and I really dislike a lot of the anti-gay, racist stances of the Religious Right.

As others above have said, I agree with Libertarian/Constitution ideals but I vote Republican so my vote counts. I donate and work for candidates I like but I won't give $$$ to the Republican Party.

The federal government exists to protect us from the British (or whoever else wants to invade our shores), enforce the Bill of Rights and to establish contract law so we can have business dealings between states. Contract law should include environmentalism to the point that if you pollute and ruin my property/air/water, you will pay. NOT environmentalism that allows the EPA and a bunch of lawyers to trample all over the Constitution.
-------------------------
Rant Mode Engaged:

Just in this thread, we've come up with Libertarian, Constitution, America First, Rational Anarchist, Independent, Progressive, Kropotkinesque, etc. that match my views to some degree. The problem is, the Democrats have created a “big tent†with party platforms that appeal to a lot of folks. Do you ever notice that Democrats never really do anything to solve problems once they are in office? All they do is spend money and stomp on the Bill of Rights to get re-elected. Now they are even pulling back from gun control because it "doesn't play", not because they believe in the Constitution. Nancy Pelosi’s stated goal as minority leader is to become majority leader – meaning gain and retain power using whatever means necessary. If they actually DID something (reduce poverty, reduce crime, etc.), we wouldn’t need them anymore – and they would necessarily pi** off someone in their “big tentâ€. The parties mentioned above will never get big because they actually believe in something more than “give me your tax moneyâ€. To make their tent bigger, they would have to compromise their strong beliefs. The Republican Party with all its faults is our only hope at a big tent, and our only hope against the Dems. The Republicans aren’t the entire answer by a long shot, but at least once in a while they actually do something to protect our shores, shrink government programs and reduce taxes.
-------------------------
Rant Mode Disengaged (but still locked and loaded -- sheesh, I sure have diarrhea of the keyboard lately).

I’ll stick with Republican candidates. I’ll even try to change the party, but I’ll certainly support a viable alternative. Don’t see one yet though.





BTW - Does anyone know the Bull Moose Party's stance on Norwegian Lesbians? :evil:
 
I am a hard core Conservative Republican born and raised in the belly of the beast, California. The Democrats have devasted gun rights in that state over the last 4 years like you can't believe. If you vote for a Dem out there and in other States like MA, NJ MD, you obviouly don't care about gun rights.

Gary Hillard!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Glad to see you made it over. I was afraid you bagged it after TFL went down. Now in your State of Vermont, you have 1 Dem Senator, One Independent (Dem) Senator and an admitted socialist (Bernie Sanders) for a US Rep. Apparently, the Dems elected to State Government are quite enlightened there since you have almost no gun restrictions. That amazes me. Please, tell your friends to quit sending those anti-gun Senators and old Bernie to Washington! Please?

Russ
 
In my travels over the years I have met pro-second amendment people from all states, parties and backgrounds.

A vote is never wasted. If you don't like who is running for office, get together and run your own candidates.
We did that down here in S. Florida this last election with some success. We start at the local level and work up.

If you follow the constitution, you can neither be right or left.
 
I'm a registered non-partisan. Can't handle the full bill of goods from any party. Republicans would sell their mother for the right price, the Democrats want society to carry the cross of the transgressions of the few.

I pick the pieces of each that agree with my personal pholosophy of practicing courtesy, consideration and responsibility for my own actions.

One of our friends is a knee jerk screaming liberal and sent a rant article about the new head of the FDA. Don't know for sure whether she was complaining about his not wanting to give contraceptives to unwed women or his advice that women should get throgh their problems with prayer.

If the former, my immediate reaction was that the trollops should keep their panties on and tell their boyfriends to pound sand rather than ask me to pay for their sexual adventures. If the latter, I would be against forcing religion on others.

On the other hand I think the argument against stem cell research is self serving bu!!$X!t.

And then on the third hand again firearms are a personal responsibility and everyone needs to back off.

Hmmm... Wonder if I've offended enough people yet.
 
Registered Democrat, Libertairian, vote for Libertarian or Republican.

Definately a member of the vast, right wing, conspiracy!
 
According to the test, I'm more of a Libritarian than anything else but I think those tests are slanted. But have many more Republican leanings than Democratic. I think 99% are full of poop, pardon my language, and cast their votes on the basis of what will benefit either corporations in which they are invested or companies/organizations which pay them.
 
I don't think there's a Party that fits my priorities: (not in any order)

Pro-Choice
Pro-Environment
Constitutionalist (dismantle 2/3rds of existent government, withdraw from NATO, abolish public education, rescind all Presidential Executive Orders and the powers associated therein; and at most, an individual 5% Income Tax (flat tax)


Trisha
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top