Carl N. Brown
Member
The people who want restrictions on legal manufacture, distribition, sales, purchase, ownership and use should be required to demonstrate how their propositions would actually impact bad behavior by bad people, beyond their just claiming it's against guns so it has to be good.
To be justified under article I section 26 of my state's constitution, regulation of arms must impact crime without interferring with lawful, tradition use of arms.
And what is so benign about non-gun violence that we should be obsessed with gun violence only? There is more in common between people who commit gun and non-gun violence than there is between the non-violent people who own or don't own guns.
To be justified under article I section 26 of my state's constitution, regulation of arms must impact crime without interferring with lawful, tradition use of arms.
And what is so benign about non-gun violence that we should be obsessed with gun violence only? There is more in common between people who commit gun and non-gun violence than there is between the non-violent people who own or don't own guns.